Articles NewsFlow La Cote de l’or et de l’argent Market Briefing

Recevez notre Marketbriefing

Dans la même rubrique

Schwerpunkt
Membre depuis octobre 2012
52 commentaires -

0 abonnées

A laissé un commentaire sur l'article :

Global Warming Chickenlittleism

- Richard Mills - Ahead of the Herd

"there are only two things infinite, the universe and human stupidity, but I am not sure about the universe".

Why is it that you use such quotes to target the anti MMGW crowd. This applies equally to the pro MMGW side, in fact only "stupid" people believe what the popular media or governments tell them. Thinkers will always look at all aspects of an argument before making a judgment. Gullible "stupid" people take what is shoved down their throat and simply say yummy without ever asking if it was good for them.

I am still awaiting a response from you on the comment Dr. Gray made:

Only one individual has been a reviewer of all of the reports issued by the IPCC. Dr. Vincent R. Gray has had a long career in scientific research in the UK, France, Canada, New Zealand and China. He has published many scientific papers in professional journals, founded the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition, and is author of the book The Greenhouse Delusion. He shares the 2007 Nobel Prize that went to the IPCC. But in October 2007, after 17 years as an expert reviewer for the IPCC, he stated: “I have been forced to the conclusion that for significant parts of the work of the IPCC, the data collection and scientific methods employed are unsound. Resistance to all efforts to try and discuss or rectify these problems has convinced me that normal scientific procedures are not only rejected by the IPCC, but that this practice is endemic, and was part of the organization from the very beginning. I therefore consider that the IPCC is fundamentally corrupt. The only 'reform' I could envisage, would be its abolition....Yes, we have to face it. The whole process is a swindle, The IPCC from the beginning was given the license to use whatever methods would be necessary to provide 'evidence' that carbon dioxide increases are harming the climate, even if this involves manipulation of dubious data and using peoples' opinions instead of science to 'prove' their case.... The disappearance of the IPCC in disgrace is not only desirable but inevitable....Sooner or later all of us will come to realize that this organization, and the thinking behind it, is phony. Unfortunately severe economic damage is likely to be done by its influence before that happens.”

These are the people who want to help you understand that your being fed lies but you ignore them. What more credibility do you look for before you say, hey this guy has a point, I better rethink my position?

Commenté il y a 3757 jours

envoyer

Début de l'article :The nature of the recently released report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is extremely alarmist. The report warns, with a 95% certainty, that global warming is man-made and that the resulting climate change will lead to: Rising temperatures, drought and increasing desertification Warming of the oceans and rising sea levels Shortages of food Loss of ice sheets & shrinking of glaciers Increasing intensity and size of storms There’s no doubt our climate is changing,... Lire la suite

Répondre à ce commentaire

Vous devez être connecté pour commenter un article

8000 caractères max.

connectez-vous ou inscrivez-vous

	Nos flux RSS		24hGold Mobile
	Gold Data Center		Convertisseur Or Argent
	Pièces d'or sur eBay		Pièces d'argent sur eBay
	Minières : outils techniques		Minières : outils d'analyse fondamentale