Articles NewsFlow La Cote de l’or et de l’argent Market Briefing

Recevez notre Marketbriefing

Dans la même rubrique

Jim C.
Membre depuis mai 2012
463 commentaires - suivi par 3 personnes

3 abonnées

A laissé un commentaire sur l'article :

Ayatollah Santorum the Sanctimonious (ASS)

- Tom DiLorenzo -

There are two differenting view of the Constitution, the Founding Fathers, and the Bill of Rights currently at war with one another. We have the traditional John Hosper's Libertarians more or less spearheaded by Senator Santorum and the radical Lew Rockwell, Tom Dilorenzo (Von Mises Institute), and Ron Paul ursurpers to that mantle.

The traditionalists believe in a limited government as did our Founding Fathers, a Federal Governement empowered to protect the rights of all within the individual states. The ursupers believe the opposite: that the Federal Government has no such power over those individual states, and constantly tout the 10th Amendment as their bible.

This difference surfaced during the Aug 11th Republican debate over mandated heath care. Ron Paul, against Federal mandated care, argued that such mandates by the State were outside the authority of the Federal Government to police. Michele Bachmann and (you guessed it) Rick Santorum argued otherwise: that wrong was wrong whether initiated by Federal or State governments. In another debate Ron Paul argued further that "..the Federal Government can't go in and prohibit states from doing bad things."

Thus we have the above rant by Tom Dilorenzo against Rick Santorum -- that Santorum would have the audactity to tell a state that it was violating it's citizens rights!

This explains DiLorenzo's zany articles condemning Lincoln for responding to an act of aggression by the Southern States. DiLorenzo and Paul would argue that a State does, indeed, have the right to do anything it wishes and is not subservient to a Federal overseer. Ron Paul himself has condemned Lincoln for not allowing the South to secede from the Union. That these professed advocates of human freedom would argue for the cause of slavery is incomprehensible. A state does indeeed have a right to secede, but only if the Federal Government becomes oppressive of rights. The pre-Civil War Federal Government was not oppressive; in fact doing everying to placate the south and it's slavery system -- mainly because the South controlled the surpreme court and had their men in the White House.

These ursurpers to traditional Libertarian lean toward anarchism -- Lew Rockwell has professed himself an 'anarcho-capatialist.' For if a state can leave the Union by whim, what is to stop that state from breaking up into smaller and smaller units -- until only the individual is left? Nothing, logically, and that is their goal.

One has only to look at Somalia to see the consequences of this: clans, private armies and police forces, private court and justices systems -- one nation divided by all.

At this point in time Rick Santorum is the true voice of Libertarianism and individual freedom. Support him.

Commenté il y a 4463 jours

envoyer

Début de l'article : In a January 18 interview with Glenn Beck Rick Santorum decided to compare his view of the Constitution with that of Ron Paul.His statements can only be described as delusional and totalitarian. Santorum first claimed to have read an eighteenth-century dictionary that defined happiness as "to do the morally right thing... Lire la suite

Répondre à ce commentaire

Vous devez être connecté pour commenter un article

8000 caractères max.

connectez-vous ou inscrivez-vous

	Nos flux RSS		24hGold Mobile
	Gold Data Center		Convertisseur Or Argent
	Pièces d'or sur eBay		Pièces d'argent sur eBay
	Minières : outils techniques		Minières : outils d'analyse fondamentale