June 4, 2013, Vancouver, BC � Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. ("Northern Dynasty" or the "Company") (TSX: NDM; NYSE MKT: NAK) has filed a 205-page submission with the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in response to its call for public comments on the revised draft Bristol Bay Watershed Assessment (BBWA), calling the draft report and process to complete it �biased, manipulative and contrary to EPA�s own guidelines.�
Northern Dynasty President & CEO Ronald Thiessen said the 2013 draft BBWA released in April suffers from the same major shortcomings as the original report published in May 2012 � in particular, that EPA continues to assess the environmental effects of a hypothetical mine of its own invention, one that does not employ modern engineering standards, environmental safeguards or project-specific mitigation measures and could not be permitted under US or Alaska law.
Although EPA�s �hypothetical mine� is sited at the location of the Pebble deposit, BBWA authors continue to refuse to consider the most extensive scientific data set available on the region � environmental baseline data collected by the Pebble Limited Partnership (the �Pebble Partnership� or �PLP�) at a cost of some $150 million. The failure to fully consider PLP�s environmental data is contrary to EPA�s own guidelines for data quality, and is compounded by the fact that BBWA study authors have never set foot on the Pebble Project site.
�The Bristol Bay Watershed Assessment process has truly become the theatre of the absurd,� Thiessen said. �Rather than waiting for the Pebble Partnership to submit a proposed development plan for consideration by federal and state regulatory agencies under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), something that is expected to occur this year, EPA has invented its own hypothetical mine, it has continued to ignore modern mine engineering practices and regulatory requirements, it has shunned the best available scientific and environmental data at its disposal, and it has created a public and peer review process designed to minimize scientific scrutiny of its work.
�We believe the Bristol Bay Watershed Assessment process to be a cynical effort to manipulate public perception about a project before it has been proposed or undergone federal and state permitting. And we believe the draft BBWA to be a fundamentally biased report that should have no bearing on the future of America�s most important undeveloped mineral resource.�
Northern Dynasty�s letter to EPA Acting Administrator Bob Perciasepe states the federal agency has further failed to provide for an open, objective and transparent public and scientific review of the 2013 draft BBWA by unnecessarily restricting public comment opportunities on a 1,300+ page document and restricting public access to its Peer Review Panel, ignoring the agency�s own guidelines for scientific peer review.
�While unprecedented, Northern Dynasty said at the outset of the BBWA process that EPA�s study could have served a valuable purpose for project stakeholders and the people of southwest Alaska if it provided an objective, science-based assessment of the true risks and opportunities associated with modern mine development in the region prior to the onset of project permitting,� Thiessen said. �Unfortunately in its current form, the BBWA is not an objective, science-based assessment but a demonstrably flawed and biased document now being used to substantial effect by the anti-development community to manipulate public and political opinion about one of America�s greatest assets, the Pebble Project.�
Other materials submitted by Northern Dynasty to EPA include:
- a summary report with numerous examples that demonstrate how BBWA study authors have distorted the potential effects of a mine designed and operated to modern engineering standards on the natural resources of Bristol Bay, relating to study methodology, steady state mine operations and range of failure scenarios;
- a summary of independent peer review reports on seven studies prepared by environmental organizations and anti-Pebble activists, all of which figure prominently in the 2013 draft BBWA. Although commissioned by EPA, assumedly to bolster the scientific credibility of the activists� studies, the peer reviewers instead highlight significant problems with scientific methodology and highly questionable or wholly inadequate conclusions;
- a summary of EPA�s failure in the 2013 BBWA report to meaningfully address criticisms that the �hypothetical mine� evaluated in the original draft does not employ modern engineering standards, as outlined in a report from Geosyntec Consultants (2012 and 2013), and directed by Dr. Michael Kavanaugh, a registered professional engineer and member of the National Academy of Engineering with 39 years of experience in water quality and groundwater restoration; and
- a report on well-established and time-proven fish habitat rehabilitation, mitigation and enhancement practices and opportunities, which demonstrates the extensive opportunities to enhance fish habitat productivity in the Pebble Project area as part of project development. This report clearly contradicts the BBWA�s unfounded conclusion that mitigation for potential fish habitat impacts associated with Pebble is not possible.
�The Pebble Project represents far too important a resource for the Bristol Bay region, the State of Alaska and the United States to have its fate decided by a biased and manipulative study,� Thiessen said, citing the 15,000 US jobs and $2.4 billion-plus annual GDP contribution forecast in a recent economic impact study of the Pebble Project. http://www.northerndynastyminerals.com/ndm/NEIStudy.asp
�Given the national significance of the project and the significant shortcomings of the 2013 BBWA draft, we remain confident that future development of Pebble will ultimately be determined by federal and state regulators working within the objective NEPA permitting process to enforce the robust environmental protection standards of the United States and Alaska.�
To view Northern Dynasty's critique of the revised draft Bristol Bay Watershed Assessment report, visit the home page of our website at www.northerndynasty.com.
To view this news release in its entirety please click on the link below or copy and paste it into your web browser.
http://www.northerndynastyminerals.com/ndm/BristolBay.asp?ReportID=586793
If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact us as provided below.
Best Regards,
Investor Services
HDI
15th Floor - 1040 West Georgia Street, Vancouver BC V6E 4H8
Toll Free 1-800-667-2114 | Main 1-604-684-6365
info@hdimining.com | www.hdimining.com
Follow us on Twitter & Facebook
If you no longer wish to be on Northern Dynasty�s email distribution list, simply reply to this email with �� in the subject line.
To be removed from all of HDI�s email lists please reply to this email with �Remove All� in the subject line.
HDI is associated with the following companies: Heatherdale Resources Ltd., Curis Resources Ltd., Northcliff Resources Ltd., Rathdowney Resources Ltd., Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd., Amarc Resources Ltd., and Quartz Mountain Resources Ltd. Visit us at www.hdimining..com for more information.
�Notice Regarding Transmission
This message is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this communication is prohibited. Please notify us of the error in communication by telephone (604-684-6365) or by return e-mail and destroy all copies of this communication. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Hunter Dickinson Inc. or any affiliated or associated company. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. Neither Hunter Dickinson Inc. nor any affiliated or associated company accepts any liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.. Thank you.�