HOLE_ID

E (MGA_E

N

(MGA)

RL

Depth (m)

Azimuth

Dip

Results*

Comments

BSRC240

382304

6590097

354

118

90

-60

NSR

BSRC241

382112

6590202

355

138

90

-60

NSR

BSRC242

382106

6590252

355

120

90

-60

NSR

BSRCD243

382068

6590198

359

156.4

90

-60

NSR

78m precollar, 78.4m DD

BSRC244

382248

6590098

355

126

90

-60

NSR

BSRC245

382211

6590242

357

117

90

-60

NSR

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Sampling techniques

• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.

• Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

• Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report.

• In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

• Drill holes were sampled using face sampling reverse circulation (RC) percussion drilling. One NQ2 Diamond core tail was also drilled.

• RC drill holes were sampled at 1m intervals via a cone-splitter connected via a cyclone directly to the drill stream. Diamond core was sampled at intervals no greater than 1.15m and no less than 0.35m. Sampling did not cross lithological boundaries.

• Individual RC drilling samples cone split from the drill rig were collected into pre-numbered calico bags. Diamond core was sampled as half core.

• Each sample was completely pulverised for multi-element analysis and to produce a 50g charge for fire assay.

Drilling techniques

• Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of Diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).

• Face sampling reverse circulation percussion drilling and NQ2 Diamond core were the drilling techniques used.

• Holes were surveyed by EMS tool (Reflex EZ Shot) in the rod stream by Blue Spec Drilling of Kalgoorlie.

Drill sample recovery

• Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.

• Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.

• Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

• Sampling intervals during RC drilling were routinely checked by comparing the position of the drill rod against the sample bag being filled. Diamond core recovery was reconciled using a tape measure and driller's markings.

• Drilling of Diamond core and RC holes were conducted with machinery and using drilling techniques appropriate to the terrain and with drillers experienced in the area.

• Sample loss was kept to a minimum by good sampling practices.

• Cone splitting of RC holes and informed sampling of Diamond core provided good representation of the intervals sampled.

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

• No recovery issues were identified with the RC or core drilling. Loss of fines at the cyclone was minimal and is not considered to have had a significant effect on sample recovery. Core recovery was very close to 100%.

• No relationship has been noted between sample recovery and grade. Overall, sample recoveries were very high and did not present a problem.

Logging

• Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.

• Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.

• The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.

• All drill holes have been geologically logged by Company geologists using a standard format over the whole length of each hole. Features for each sample or geological interval recorded, where observable, included weathering, lithology, alteration mineralogy, structural information, mineralisation mineralogy, veining, vein mineralogy and proportions of non-economic minerals.

• Geological logging recorded factual data (e.g. colour, grain size, percentage of identifiable minerals present) and interpretative data (e.g. lithology).

• A subsample of washed and sieved RC chips from each metre was collected and stored sequentially in numbered plastic chip trays. Chips trays representing each RC drill hole are stored in the Company's

head office in Adelaide. Diamond core was sampled as half core with the remaining half stored at the company's facilities in Kalgoorlie.

Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation

• If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.

• If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.

• For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.

• Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.

• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.

• RC samples were sampled from a cone splitter attached to the drill rig at 1m intervals and rejects collected placed in sequential order on the ground adjacent to the drill rig. Diamond core was cut using a core saw and sampled as half core.

• Samples were taken dry.

• Sample size presented for analysis was approximately 2kg.

• Preparation and analysis of samples was undertaken by

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.

Minanalytical Laboratory Services Australia Pty Ltd at their Perth laboratory.

• Samples were pulverised to 85% passing 75 micron.

• Field duplicates were collected every 20th metre mark on each hole and results obtained compared well with the original sample.

Quality of assay data and laboratory tests

• The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

• For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.

• Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.

• Gold was analysed for using Minanalytical method FA50AAS, consisting of a 50g charge fire assay with detection by atomic absorption spectroscopy at a detection limit of 0.005ppm Au (gold). No strong nugget effect was observed in repeated assays and screening of samples prior to fire assay was not considered necessary. A four acid digest was used to produce a solution which was then analysed for a multi-element suite with detection by mass spectrometer (MA40MS) or optical emission spectral (MA40OES) methods.

• No data from geophysical tools were used to determine grade control assay results.

• The QAQC protocol used consisted of certified standards plus blanks, each inserted at a rate of 1:20.

• Field duplicates were collected every 20th metre mark and results compared well.

• A review of the analytical performance of the external standards and blanks by Southern Gold staff indicated that the results were acceptable in the majority of samples.

Verification of sampling and assaying

• The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.

• The use of twinned holes.

• Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

• Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

• Significant intersections were visually inspected and verified by the Competent Person (Mr Ian Blucher).

• Twinned holes have not been drilled.

• All sampling data is recorded by hand onto logging sheets and re- checked before submission to the lab. Data is then entered into digital form and stored on the Company database after validation. Original logging

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

sheets are filed in the Company's Head Office in Adelaide.

• The assay database is stored securely on the Company's server which is backed up routinely both on and offsite.

• No adjustments are made to the assay data after review of QAQC measures as stated above.

Location of data points

• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

• Specification of the grid system used.

• Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

• Drill hole collar positions have been surveyed by Garmin handheld GPS to an accuracy of

• Holes were surveyed by EMS tool (Reflex EZ Shot) in the rod stream by Blue Spec Drilling of Kalgoorlie.

• The grid system used for locating the collar positions of drill holes is the Geocentric Datum of Australia (GDA94), Zone 51 (MGA Projection). Elevations are recorded in Australian Height Datum (AHD).

• Topographic control in the area is provided by SRTM data.

+/- 5m.

Data spacing and distribution

• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

• Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

• Whether sample compositing has been applied.

• The average drill hole spacing was approximately 40m on three drill lines.

• No Mineral Resource has been calculated.

• Sample compositing has not been applied.

Orientation of data in relation to geological structure

• Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.

• If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

• Oriented core measurements show that drilling is at a high enough angle to lithological boundaries and structural trends to indicate that sampling is unbiased by the direction of drilling.

• Not applicable.

Sample security

• The measures taken to ensure sample security.

• RC samples are placed into pre- numbered calico bags directly from the splitter under the supervision of the rig geologist. Core is cut and sampled in a secure facility.

• The geologist places the calicos bags containing the samples into polyweave bags and transports them to the sample preparation laboratory where a sample submission form is completed. The details entered onto the sample submission form are the means by which the samples are tracked through the laboratory.

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

• Samples are transported by internal courier from the preparation facility to the analytical laboratory.

• The laboratory provides the Company with a reconciliation of samples submitted compared to samples received.

Audits or reviews

• The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.

• No audits or reviews have been undertaken.