Polymet Mining Corp

Published : August 27th, 2013

DNI EXPANDS BUCKTON ZONE INFERRED RESOURCE TO 4.9 BILLION TONS AND ALSO REPORTS AN INITIAL INDICATED

( 0 vote, 0/5 ) Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating Follow Company  
0
Send
0
comment
Keywords :   Canada | Cerium | Cobalt |

NEWS RELEASE - August 27, 2013

 

DNI METALS INC. (DNI : TSX-Ven)(DG7 : Frankfurt)

 

DNI EXPANDS BUCKTON ZONE INFERRED RESOURCE TO 4.9 BILLION TONS AND ALSO REPORTS AN INITIAL INDICATED RESOURCE ON ITS ALBERTA POLYMETALLIC BLACK SHALE PROJECT

 

DNI Metals Inc. (DNI:TSX-Ven)(DG7:FSE) announces results of its NI-43-101 compliant resource study just completed which updates and expands the mineral resource at the Buckton Zone on its Alberta polymetallic black shale project. The Updated and Expanded Buckton Mineral Resource Study (the "Updated Resource Study") successfully expands the inferred resource at the Buckton Zone from 3.5 billion short tons to 4.9 billion short tons, in addition to upgrading a portion of it to the indicated resource class by delineating a 300 million short ton indicated mineral resource. The inferred and indicated resources together extend over 21.9 square kilometres (approximately a 3kmx8km area), 20.4 square kilometres of which represents the aerial extent of the inferred resource.

 

The updated Buckton mineral resources are hosted in two near-surface stacked black shale horizons which are mineralized with recoverable Mo-Ni-U-V-Zn-Co-Cu-Li-REEs-Y-Th-Sc, and are partly exposed on surface. The Buckton Zone is one of six mineralized systems, or zones, identified on DNI's 2,720 square kilometre Property in northeast Alberta.

 

The Updated Resource Study updates the Buckton mineral resource based on results from DNI's 2012 drilling over the Buckton Zone and with the benefit of preliminary guidance from the scoping study in progress. It significantly expands, supersedes and replaces all prior resource estimates announced from the Buckton Zone. The updated and expanded Buckton mineral resource forms the basis for the preliminary economic assessment scoping study which is in progress and expected to be completed in September. The scoping study is being prepared by P&E Mining Consultants Inc. with input from Hatch which was retained to review DNI's metals recovery testwork to provide process engineering guidelines toward formulating metals recovery flow sheets and related operating cost estimates.

 

The mineral resources being announced are based on a base cut-off of US$11/tonne and US$12.5/tonne for the Labiche and the Second White Speckled Shale Formations, respectively, reflecting the different operating cost estimates related to leaching of metals from the two Formations. Unlike prior resource studies from the Zone which were arbitrarily constrained by a maximum mineable depth of 75m, the resources reported in the current study comprise all mineralized tonnages which represent sufficient gross recoverable value exceeding the base cut-off to accommodate removal of overlying cover waste material. The Updated Resource Study also uses more current metal prices than those in prior studies, as well as higher base cut-offs and more conservative metals recoveries believed to better represent bioheapleaching field conditions. The Updated Resource Study relies on initial findings from the scoping study which is in progress, and incorporates preliminary mine engineering design and operating cost estimates into revised base cut-offs as well as mining depth criteria for the purposes of classifying mineralized material as resources.

 

The Updated and Expanded Buckton Mineral Resource Study was prepared by Apex Geoscience Ltd ("Apex"), Edmonton, under the supervision of Mr.Roy Eccles PGeol, Mr.Michael Dufresne PGeol, Mr.Steven Nicholls MAIG and Kyle McMillan PGeol, who are the Qualified Persons in connection with its preparation and are independent of DNI. The Study relies on the collective of DNI's drilling programs over the Buckton Zone, together with historic drilling from the area from which all archived drill core were previously re-sampled and re-analyzed by DNI in 2009 and 2012. All of the foregoing drilling campaigns were implemented by Apex under the supervision of Mr.Dufresne. The Updated Resource Study complies with National Instrument 43-101 and CIM resource estimation guidelines.

 

This press release is a summary of salient conclusions from the Updated Resource Study report which will shortly be filed to SEDAR and will be available from www.sedar.com. The report will also be available from DNI's website www.dnimetals.com once it is filed.

 

The updated and expanded Buckton mineral resource consists of 4,894,386,000 short tons (4,440,112,000 tonnes) of inferred resource extending over 20.4 square kilometres, and 299,760,000 short tons (271,938,000 tonnes) of indicated resource extending over 1.5 square kilometres. The resources comprise a wedge of continuous mineralization hosted in the Labiche Formation and underlying Second White Speckled Shale Formation, which are two flat-lying black shale Formations that are stacked to comprise a continuous thick zone of mineralized shale. The resources are mineralized with recoverable Molybdenum (Mo), Nickel (Ni), Uranium (U), Vanadium (V), Zinc (Zn), Copper (Cu), Cobalt (Co), Lithium (Li), Scandium (Sc), Thorium (Th) and Rare Earth Elements Lanthanum (La), Cerium (Ce), Praseodymium (Pr), Neodymium (Nd), Samarium (Sm), Europium (Eu), Gadolinium (Gd), Terbium (Tb), Dysprosium (Dy), Yttrium (Y). The Updated Resource Study estimates that the inferred and the indicated resources are overlain by 1,732,104,000 short tons (1,571,338,000 tonnes) and 31,320,000 short tons (28,413,000 tonnes) of glacial till overburden, respectively. Details of the inferred and indicated resources are tabulated at the end of this announcement.

 

Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the mineral resource reported herein will be converted into a mineral reserve. The metal recoveries reported represent preliminary mineral recovery testing results collated from the collective bench scale laboratory testwork completed by DNI to date and may not reflect actual process recoverability that might be achieved in a mineral production operation, all of which is the subject of ongoing studies.

 

The updated Buckton mineral resources consist of an Upper, lower-grade, mineralized horizon hosted in the Labiche Formation which directly overlies a higher-grading horizon hosted in the Second White Speckled Shale Formation beneath it. The two Formations together comprise an approximately 13m-140m thick wedge of mineralized black shale, extending westward from the eastern erosional edge of the Birch Mountains where they are exposed on surface but are under progressively thicker cover westwards.

 

The updated and expanded Buckton inferred resource is distributed between the Upper and Lower portions as follows (also tabulated separately at the end of this announcement): (a) 3.9 billion short tons (2.5 billion metric tonnes) in the Upper, lower grade, portion hosted in the Labiche Formation ranging 13m-115m in thickness (ultimate thickness of the Labiche Shale at the Property is unknown as near-surface portions of it have been locally scoured away by glaciation); and (b) 1 billion short tons (0.9 billion metric tonnes) in the Lower, higher grade, portion hosted in the Second White Speckled Shale Formation ranging 13m-26m in thickness. Details of the Upper and Lower portions comprising the inferred resource are tabulated at the end of this press release.

 

The Buckton indicated resource is distributed between the Upper and Lower portions as follows (also tabulated separately at the end of this announcement): (a) 228 million short tons (207 million metric tonnes) in the Upper, lower grade, zone hosted in the Labiche Formation ranging 13m-115m in thickness (ultimate thickness of the Labiche Shale at the Property is unknown as near-surface portions of it have been locally scoured away by glaciation); and  (b) 72 million short tons (65 million metric tonnes) in the Lower, higher grade, zone hosted in the Second White Speckled Shale Formation ranging 13m-23m in thickness. Details of the Upper and Lower portions comprising the indicated resource are tabulated at the end of this announcement.

 

The Buckton inferred resource is open to the north, northeast and south, and eastward to the erosional edge of the Birch Mountains over a large area with thin overburden cover where mineralization intermittently outcrops at surface or is intermittently exposed throughout several kilometres of valley walls. The inferred resource is open to the south over the approximately seven kilometres separating it from the Buckton South Zone mineral resource (announced January 11, 2013) and available surface exploration information suggests that the two Zones may well be connected. The indicated resource is surrounded by the inferred resource and is, as such, open in all directions into mineralization which may be upgraded into the indicated class subject to infill drilling.

 

The Updated Resource Study concludes that the updated Buckton inferred and indicated mineral resources represent mineralization which has a reasonable prospect for extraction in the future. These resources comprise all Labiche and Second White Speckled Shale resource blocks for which the combined gross value of recoverable contained Mo-Ni-U-V-Zn-Co-Cu-Li-REEs-Y-Th-Sc exceeds the base cut-offs of US$11 and US$12.5 per tonne for the Labiche and Second White Speckled Shales, respectively, relying on interim metals recovery results from DNI's leaching testwork in progress at Canmet (press April 16, 2012), and for which the combined gross value of recoverable contained metals is sufficiently high to accommodate costs of removal of overlying cover waste material. Metal prices used are the two year trailing commodity price averages to May 31, 2013.

 

Modelling and estimation of the updated Buckton mineral resources was carried out using 3-dimensional block model based on geostatistical applications using commercial mine planning software MICROMINE. The model relies on an aggregate of seventeen vertical core holes distributed over an area of approximately 20 square kilometres, and spaced approximately 240m-2km apart (averaging 1km), and was generated using the combined drill hole data derived from drilling campaigns conducted in 1997, 2011 and 2012. The Updated Resource Study concludes that mineralized black shale in the area shows good lateral uniformity for many of the contained metals over large distances across the Property, that the spacing and number of drill holes over the Buckton Zone are sufficient for the determination of an inferred resource, and that extrapolation of grades between the drill holes is supported by statistical variography examined during the Study. It also concludes that the spacing and number of holes over a portion of the Zone are sufficient for the delineation of an indicated resource, and that extrapolation of grades between the drill holes is also supported by statistical variography examined during the Study. Considering that leaching tests completed by DNI to date on samples from the Labiche and Second White Speckled Shale formations report different recoveries for the metals of interest, the resource modelling treated the two shale units separately.

 

Variography was conducted on the composited drill hole data within the Labiche and Second White Speckled Shale domains to produce spherical semivariogram's. Each element was modeled individually to determine the continuity and orientation of mineralization. As a result of the wide hole spacing a parent model block size of 250mx250mx3m was chosen for the resource estimate. The block model extents were extended far enough past the mineralized wireframe to encompass the entire domain. The recoverable grades for the metals were translated into a US$ value for each block and sub-block relying on the metals recoveries from DNI's leaching tests and two-year trailing average metal/oxide prices to May 31, 2013, and the values were aggregated into a collective gross recoverable value for each block and sub-block to enable testing against the block value base case cut-off for each Formation.

 

While the collective work from the Buckton Zone indicate that none of the metals present in the Buckton Zone occurs in sufficiently high enough concentration to be of economic merit by itself, the metals of interest collectively represent sufficient recoverable gross value on a combined basis to place the resources identified at the Buckton Zone within reach of economic viability provided the metals are efficiently recovered on a combined basis. DNI's leaching testwork has already demonstrated that the metals can be collectively extracted from the shale but clear communication of overall bulk grade has been a challenge considering the polymetallic nature of the mineralization of merit. In the foregoing regard, the Updated Resource Study notes, with concurrence from DNI, that given the absence of a single metal to represent bulk of the overall recoverable value of the mineralized shale, reporting of its overall grade as a traditional "metal equivalent" would be arbitrary and misleading. Of necessity, the Resource Study has, accordingly, opted instead to communicate overall grade by aggregating the individual gross recoverable values represented by each of the metals of interest into a single gross recoverable total per tonne value to characterize the resource and enable its discussion and testing against a base cut-off for the purposes of resource estimation. The reader is cautioned that disclosure of gross values discussed in this announcement and in the Resource Study does not comply with Section 2.3(1c) of National Instrument 43-101 since the figures are gross and the term may be misleading in the absence of proven production costs. The recoverable gross values are quoted for convenience of communicating overall grade and are otherwise conceptual in nature and do not represent economic worth of the resource being reported from the Buckton Zone. The reader is also reminded that the values are based on recoverable metal grades per bench scale leaching tests and do not imply that economic viability of the recoveries has been determined and they may not reflect actual recoveries which might be achieved in an ultimate mineral production operation.

 

Polymetallic black shale is an emerging deposit type which has gained recognition over the past decade mainly due to advances in application of bioleaching procedures to extract low grade metals from shale by bulk-heap leaching. Worldwide, there is one active mining operation extracting polymetals via bio-heapleaching and two other scoping stage projects that are exploring/developing polymetallic deposits in black shale. These operations provide the only resource estimation and operating cost guidelines, particularly with respect to base cut-off values, that are relevant to evaluating the mineral resource hosted in the Buckton Zone.

 

The US$11 and US$12.5 per tonne base cut-offs used by the Updated Resource Study are considered to be reasonable benchmarks which are higher than cut-offs utilized by recent mineral resource estimates and a scoping study for other open pit mineable poly-metallic black shales in Sweden and Finland as the break-even point and lower cut-off. These base cut-offs are guided by initial preliminary findings from DNI's ongoing scoping study for the Buckton Zone, and incorporate operating costs from the only available operation worldwide of bulk mining and bioheapleaching exploitation of a polymetallic black shale deposit. The cut-offs also include a nominal cost for refining of REEs into saleable final products relying on estimates from other REE projects. Considering a scenario of possible open pit mining in northeast Alberta along the eastern edge of the Birch Mountains, with potential for a low strip ratio at startup, the likely free-dig nature of the poorly consolidated shale bedrock, the potential for easy access to multiple working faces, the location of the project with respect to access, power and other important infrastructure, the foregoing base cut-off values are considered reasonable for the purposes of mineral resource estimation as base case thresholds which also capture a relatively continuous mineralized zone with favourable bulk mining configuration.

 

DNI's leaching testwork demonstrated that the Buckton Zone mineralization is recoverable by a single bulk leaching method from the shale and that REEs and Specialty Metals are incidentally leached from the shale as co-products of leaching of base metals. Considering that REEs account for a significant proportion of the recoverable gross value of the resource, especially for the Upper portion of mineralization in the Labiche shale, the ultimate economics of the resource are, accordingly, subject to uncertainties of long term REE pricing and viability of demand, the unknown effect of new production on REE markets, and the cost of separating REEs from pregnant leaching solutions once they have been leached from the shale and their refinement into saleable final products. Although the base cut-offs used in the Updated Resource Study include a nominal cost for separation of REEs relying on estimates from other REE projects, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to investigate sensitivity of the Buckton resources to cost fluctuations by testing the resource model against progressively higher arbitrary base cut-offs.

 

The resource model was iterated and tested at progressively higher arbitrary base cut-offs to determine the commensurate tonnages that can be classified as mineral resources against any given base cut-off. The entire shale package resource model was, accordingly, tested at base cut-offs of US$12.5, US$15, US$20, US$25,  US$30, US$35, US$40 and US$50 per tonne, and the respective tonnages that can be classified as a mineral resource were estimated. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the tonnage and distribution of the shale package is virtually intact between base cut-offs of US$11 per tonne and approximately US$20 per tonne, and that the aggregate gross recoverable value of contained metals exceeds the base cut-off, but that at progressively higher base cut-offs the tonnage of the Upper (lower grade) portion of the resource which is hosted in the Labiche shale rapidly decreases and distribution of resource blocks lose cohesion and ultimately virtually none of the Upper zone in Labiche shale can be classified as a mineral resource since the aggregate gross recoverable value of the contained metals is less than the cut-off.

 

The sensitivity analysis successfully demonstrated that as the spatial distribution of the Labiche resource decreases, progressively larger portions of Labiche would be regarded as cover waste material to be removed for the purposes of any mining operations to extract the underlying resource in the Second White Speckled Shale Formation. Considering that distribution of the Upper zone hosted in Labiche shale will affect distribution and tonnage of what might be realistically mined from the underlying Lower zone resource hosted in the Second White Speckled Shale, the resource model was tested at the higher base cut-offs to simulate a scenario for which the Upper portion of the resource hosted in Labiche shale is deemed to be waste and would have to be removed together with the overburden to gain access to the underlying higher grade mineralization in the Second White Speckled Shale. In these iterative scenarios, the Lower portion of the resource hosted in the Speckled Shale is the only mineralization of interest and the resource identified within it remains intact between base cut-offs of US$11 per tonne and US$35, but gradually loses cohesion at higher base cut-offs such that at a base cut-off of US$50 per tonne virtually none of it can be classified as a mineral resource since the aggregate gross recoverable value of contained metals is less than the base cut-off.

 

The Updated Resource Study concludes that the inferred and indicated resources announced herein at the Buckton Zone have excellent potential for expansion with further drilling. The Study recommends implementation of infill drilling over the Buckton Zone to upgrade additional material to the indicated class, along with exploratory drilling to test the seven kilomtres separating the Buckton Zone resources from the mineral resource Buckton South Zone (announced February 28, 2013). The Study also recommends that DNI's ongoing leaching testwork be expanded and that DNI give consideration to commencing baseline environmental studies relating to the Buckton Zone.

 

In a statement Mr.S.Sabag, DNI's president & CEO, commented: ". we are excited to announce this expanded mineral resource from the Buckton Zone, and look forward with equal excitement to concluding the preliminary economic assessment scoping study which is scheduled for completion in September".

 


Updated and Expanded Buckton Inferred Mineral Resource

Upper (Labiche Formation) and Lower (Second White Speckled Shale) Portions Combined

Mineralized Shale (tons)

4,894,386,000

 

MoO3

Ni

U3O8

V2O5

Zn

Cu

Co

Li2CO3

Raw Grade (ppm)

23.0

67.4

10.7

606.4

169.6

40.2

15.3

375.2

Recovery %

3

64

70

7

52

25

72

17

Recoverable Grade (ppm)

0.7

43.1

7.5

42.5

88.2

10.1

11.0

63.8

Metal/Oxide Price* (US$/lb)

12.89

8.34

60.74

5.89

0.94

3.64

14.38

2.82

Recoverable metal/oxide (kg)

3,058,000

191,533,000

33,389,000

188,484,000

391,683,000

44,629,000

49,040,000

283,238,000

Recoverable metal/oxide (lbs)

6,742,000

422,257,000

73,610,000

415,536,000

863,512,000

98,390,000

108,115,000

624,432,000

 

 

La2O3

Ce2O3

Pr2O3

Nd2O3

Sm2O3

Eu2O3

Gd2O3

Tb2O3

Raw Grade (ppm)  

48.6

84.0

10.5

40.2

7.9

1.7

6.7

1.0

Recovery %

20

30

40

43

47

61

63

65

Recoverable Grade (ppm) 

9.7

25.2

4.2

17.3

3.7

1.0

4.2

0.7

Metal/Oxide Prices* (US$/kg)

44.58

43.20

140.41

156.16

68.16

2,742.11

105.78

2,190.48

Recoverable Oxide (kg)

43,190,000

111,947,000

18,676,000

76,718,000

16,523,000

4,490,000

18,740,000

3,020,000

Recoverable Oxide (lbs)

95,218,000

246,801,000

41,173,000

169,134,000

36,427,000

9,899,000

41,315,000

6,658,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dy2O3

Ho2O3

Er2O3

Tm2O3

Yb2O3

Lu2O3

Y2O3

Sc2O3

ThO2

Raw Grade (ppm)  

5.9

1.2

3.4

0.5

3.4

0.5

40.5

16.5

11.9

Recovery %

65

64

62

60

58

55

67

24

12.5

Recoverable Grade (ppm) 

3.9

0.8

2.1

0.3

2.0

0.3

27.1

3.9

1.5

Metal/Oxide Prices* (US$/kg)

1,240.31

202.98

169.01

97.00

102.98

1,273.00

107.77

4,194.66

252.00

Recoverable Oxide (kg)

17,160,000

3,334,000

9,458,000

1,369,000

8,759,000

1,328,000

120,398,000

17,534,000

6,624,000

Recoverable Oxide (lbs)

37,831,000

7,350,000

20,851,000

3,018,000

19,310,000

2,928,000

265,432,000

38,656,000

14,603,000

* Metal or oxide prices are the two-year trailing average to May 31, 2013 (three-years for Tm2O3). Sources: Metal-pages.com; Asianmetal.com; USGS. Metal prices vary among various commodity information sources and, in all conflicting instances, the lower pricing was used. The 2011 and 2012 drilling included an appropriate number of analytical standards, blanks and duplicates, and no analytical issues were identified. Re-analysis of historic drill core included an appropriate number of analytical standards, blanks and duplicates, and no analytical issues were identified. ton=short ton; lb=pound; kg=kilogram; Recoverable metal/oxide stated to nearest 1000kg or 1000lb. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the mineral resources reported herein will be converted into a mineral reserve. See additional cautionary language at end of this press release.


 

Updated and Expanded Buckton Inferred Mineral Resource

Upper Portion - in Labiche Formation

Mineralized Shale (tons)

3,876,767,000

 

MoO3

Ni

U3O8

V2O5

Zn

Cu

Co

Li2CO3

Raw Grade (ppm)

2.9

47.7

5.2

445.8

140.7

30.8

13.6

394.3

Recovery %

3

64

70

7

52

25

72

17

Recoverable Grade (ppm)

0.1

30.5

3.6

31.2

73.2

7.7

9.8

67.0

Metal/Oxide Price* (US$/lb)

12.89

8.34

60.74

5.89

0.94

3.64

14.38

2.82

Recoverable metal/oxide (kg)

306,000

107,417,000

12,757,000

109,756,000

257,290,000

27,100,000

34,416,000

235,720,000

Recoverable metal/oxide (lbs)

675,000

236,814,000

28,124,000

241,970,000

567,227,000

59,745,000

75,874,000

519,673,000

 

 

La2O3

Ce2O3

Pr2O3

Nd2O3

Sm2O3

Eu2O3

Gd2O3

Tb2O3

Raw Grade (ppm)  

44.3

79.1

9.6

36.0

6.9

1.4

5.6

0.9

Recovery    %

20

30

40

43

47

61

63

65

Recoverable Grade (ppm) 

8.9

23.7

3.8

15.5

3.3

0.9

3.5

0.6

Metal/Oxide Prices* (US$/kg)

44.58

43.20

140.41

156.16

68.16

2,742.11

105.78

2,190.48

Recoverable Oxide (kg)

31,167,000

83,482,000

13,471,000

54,442,000

11,442,000

3,078,000

12,379,000

2,022,000

Recoverable Oxide (lb)

68,711,000

184,046,000

29,698,000

120,024,000

25,225,000

6,786,000

27,291,000

4,458,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dy2O3

Ho2O3

Er2O3

Tm2O3

Yb2O3

Lu2O3

Y2O3

Sc2O3

ThO2

Raw Grade (ppm)  

5.0

1.0

3.0

0.5

3.1

0.5

32.0

17.2

12.0

Recovery    %

65

64

62

60

58

55

67

24

12.5

Recoverable Grade (ppm) 

3.3

0.6

1.9

0.3

1.8

0.3

21.5

4.1

1.5

Metal/Oxide Prices* (US$/kg)

1,240.31

202.98

169.01

97.00

102.98

1,273.00

107.77

4,194.66

252.00

Recoverable Oxide (kg)

11,524,000

2,261,000

6,539,000

958,000

6,244,000

957,000

75,473,000

14,544,000

5,262,000

Recoverable Oxide (lb)

25,406,000

4,985,000

14,416,000

2,112,000

13,766,000

2,110,000

166,389,000

32,064,000

11,601,000

* Metal or oxide prices are the two-year trailing average to May 31, 2013 (three-years for Tm2O3). Sources: Metal-pages.com; Asianmetal.com; USGS. Metal prices vary among various commodity information sources and, in all conflicting instances, the lower pricing was used. The 2011 and 2012 drilling included an appropriate number of analytical standards, blanks and duplicates, and no analytical issues were identified. Re-analysis of historic drill core included an appropriate number of analytical standards, blanks and duplicates, and no analytical issues were identified. ton=short ton; lb=pound; kg=kilogram; Recoverable metal/oxide stated to nearest 1000kg or 1000lb. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the mineral resources reported herein will be converted into a mineral reserve. See additional cautionary language at end of this press release.

 

 

Updated and Expanded Buckton Inferred Mineral Resource

Lower Portion - in Second White Speckled Shale Formation

Mineralized Shale (tons)

1,017,619,000

 

MoO3

Ni

U3O8

V2O5

Zn

Cu

Co

Li2CO3

Raw Grade (ppm)

99.4

142.4

31.9

1218.3

280.0

76.0

22.0

302.8

Recovery %

3

64

70

7

52

25

72

17

Recoverable Grade (ppm)

3.0

91.1

22.3

85.3

145.6

19.0

15.8

51.5

Metal/Oxide Price* (US$/lb)

12.89

8.34

60.74

5.89

0.94

3.64

14.38

2.82

Recoverable metal/oxide (kg)

2,752,000

84,116,000

20,632,000

78,728,000

134,393,000

17,529,000

14,624,000

47,518,000

Recoverable metal/oxide (lbs)

6,067,000

185,444,000

45,486,000

173,565,000

296,285,000

38,645,000

32,240,000

104,759,000

 

 

La2O3

Ce2O3

Pr2O3

Nd2O3

Sm2O3

Eu2O3

Gd2O3

Tb2O3

Raw Grade (ppm)  

65.1

102.8

14.1

56.1

11.7

2.5

10.9

1.7

Recovery %

20

30

40

43

47

61

63

65

Recoverable Grade (ppm) 

13.0

30.8

5.6

24.1

5.5

1.5

6.9

1.1

Metal/Oxide Prices* (US$/kg)

44.58

43.20

140.41

156.16

68.16

2,742.11

105.78

2,190.48

Recoverable Oxide (kg)

12,024,000

28,465,000

5,205,000

22,276,000

5,081,000

1,412,000

6,361,000

999,000

Recoverable Oxide (lb)

26,508,000

62,755,000

11,475,000

49,110,000

11,202,000

3,113,000

14,024,000

2,202,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dy2O3

Ho2O3

Er2O3

Tm2O3

Yb2O3

Lu2O3

Y2O3

Sc2O3

ThO2

Raw Grade (ppm)  

9.4

1.8

5.1

0.7

4.7

0.7

72.6

13.5

11.8

Recovery %

65

64

62

60

58

55

67

24

12.5

Recoverable Grade (ppm) 

6.1

1.2

3.2

0.4

2.7

0.4

48.7

3.2

1.5

Metal/Oxide Prices* (US$/kg)

1,240.31

202.98

169.01

97.00

102.98

1,273.00

107.77

4,194.66

252.00

Recoverable Oxide (kg)

5,637,000

1,073,000

2,918,000

411,000

2,515,000

371,000

44,925,000

2,990,000

1,361,000

Recoverable Oxide (lb)

12,427,000

2,366,000

6,433,000

906,000

5,545,000

818,000

99,043,000

6,592,000

3,000,000

* Metal or oxide prices are the two-year trailing average to May 31, 2013 (three-years for Tm2O3). Sources: Metal-pages.com; Asianmetal.com; USGS. Metal prices vary among various commodity information sources and, in all conflicting instances, the lower pricing was used. The 2011 and 2012 drilling included an appropriate number of analytical standards, blanks and duplicates, and no analytical issues were identified. Re-analysis of historic drill core included an appropriate number of analytical standards, blanks and duplicates, and no analytical issues were identified. ton=short ton; lb=pound; kg=kilogram; Recoverable metal/oxide stated to nearest 1000kg or 1000lb. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the mineral resources reported herein will be converted into a mineral reserve. See additional cautionary language at end of this press release.


 

Buckton Indicated Mineral Resource

Upper (Labiche Formation) and Lower (Second White Speckled Shale) Portions Combined

Mineralized Shale (tons)

299,760,000

 

MoO3

Ni

U3O8

V2O5

Zn

Cu

Co

Li2CO3

Raw Grade (ppm)

27.0

70.3

10.9

659.9

174.8

41.6

16.5

372.4

Recovery %

3

64

70

7

52

25

72

17

Recoverable Grade (ppm)

0.8

45.0

7.6

46.2

90.9

10.4

11.9

63.3

Metal/Oxide Price* (US$/lb)

12.89

8.34

60.74

5.89

0.94

3.64

14.38

2.82

Recoverable metal/oxide (kg)

220,000

12,231,000

2,079,000

12,562,000

24,723,000

2,832,000

3,229,000

17,217,000

Recoverable metal/oxide (lbs)

485,000

26,965,000

4,583,000

27,694,000

54,505,000

6,243,000

7,119,000

37,957,000

 

 

La2O3

Ce2O3

Pr2O3

Nd2O3

Sm2O3

Eu2O3

Gd2O3

Tb2O3

Raw Grade (ppm)  

48.4

84.0

10.2

39.0

7.6

1.6

6.4

1.0

Recovery %

20

30

40

43

47

61

63

65

Recoverable Grade (ppm) 

9.7

25.2

4.1

16.8

3.6

1.0

4.1

0.7

Metal/Oxide Prices* (US$/kg)

44.58

43.20

140.41

156.16

68.16

2,742.11

105.78

2,190.48

Recoverable Oxide (kg)

2,633,000

6,849,000

1,111,000

4,559,000

973,000

265,000

1,105,000

177,000

Recoverable Oxide (lbs)

5,805,000

15,099,000

2,449,000

10,051,000

2,145,000

584,000

2,436,000

390,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dy2O3

Ho2O3

Er2O3

Tm2O3

Yb2O3

Lu2O3

Y2O3

Sc2O3

ThO2

Raw Grade (ppm)  

5.8

1.2

3.4

0.5

3.4

0.5

39.2

17.3

12.0

Recovery %

65

64

62

60

58

55

67

24

12.5

Recoverable Grade (ppm) 

3.8

0.8

2.1

0.3

2.0

0.3

26.2

4.2

1.5

Metal/Oxide Prices* (US$/kg)

1,240.31

202.98

169.01

97.00

102.98

1,273.00

107.77

4,194.66

252.00

Recoverable Oxide (kg)

1,033,000

208,000

579,000

85,000

537,000

82,000

7,134,000

1,132,000

407,000

Recoverable Oxide (lbs)

2,277,000

459,000

1,276,000

187,000

1,184,000

181,000

15,728,000

2,496,000

897,000

* Metal or oxide prices are the two-year trailing average to May 31, 2013 (three-years for Tm2O3). Sources: Metal-pages.com; Asianmetal.com; USGS. Metal prices vary among various commodity information sources and, in all conflicting instances, the lower pricing was used. The 2011 and 2012 drilling included an appropriate number of analytical standards, blanks and duplicates, and no analytical issues were identified. Re-analysis of historic drill core included an appropriate number of analytical standards, blanks and duplicates, and no analytical issues were identified. ton=short ton; lb=pound; kg=kilogram; Recoverable metal/oxide stated to nearest 1000kg or 1000lb. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the mineral resources reported herein will be converted into a mineral reserve. See additional cautionary language at end of this press release.

 

 

Buckton Indicated Mineral Resource

Upper Portion - in Labiche Formation

Mineralized Shale (tons)

227,747,000

 

MoO3

Ni

U3O8

V2O5

Zn

Cu

Co

Li2CO3

Raw Grade (ppm)

3.7

47.3

5.2

452.7

143.6

31.3

14.3

395.7

Recovery %

3

64

70

7

52

25

72

17

Recoverable Grade (ppm)

0.1

30.3

3.6

31.7

74.7

7.8

10.3

67.3

Metal/Oxide Price* (US$/lb)

12.89

8.34

60.74

5.89

0.94

3.64

14.38

2.82

Recoverable metal/oxide (kg)

23,000

6,255,000

750,000

6,547,000

15,430,000

1,617,000

2,127,000

13,900,000

Recoverable metal/oxide (lbs)

51,000

13,790,000

1,653,000

14,434,000

34,017,000

3,565,000

4,689,000

30,644,000

 

 

La2O3

Ce2O3

Pr2O3

Nd2O3

Sm2O3

Eu2O3

Gd2O3

Tb2O3

Raw Grade (ppm)  

45.5

82.2

9.7

36.8

7.1

1.5

5.7

0.9

Recovery    %

20

30

40

43

47

61

63

65

Recoverable Grade (ppm) 

9.1

24.7

3.9

15.8

3.3

0.9

3.6

0.6

Metal/Oxide Prices* (US$/kg)

44.58

43.20

140.41

156.16

68.16

2,742.11

105.78

2,190.48

Recoverable Oxide (kg)

1,880,000

5,097,000

800,000

3,273,000

690,000

186,000

747,000

121,000

Recoverable Oxide (lb)

4,145,000

11,237,000

1,764,000

7,216,000

1,521,000

410,000

1,647,000

267,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dy2O3

Ho2O3

Er2O3

Tm2O3

Yb2O3

Lu2O3

Y2O3

Sc2O3

ThO2

Raw Grade (ppm)  

5.2

1.1

3.1

0.5

3.2

0.5

34.2

18.3

12.1

Recovery    %

65

64

62

60

58

55

67

24

12.5

Recoverable Grade (ppm) 

3.4

0.7

1.9

0.3

1.9

0.3

22.9

4.4

1.5

Metal/Oxide Prices* (US$/kg)

1,240.31

202.98

169.01

97.00

102.98

1,273.00

107.77

4,194.66

252.00

Recoverable Oxide (kg)

703,000

142,000

403,000

60,000

383,000

59,000

4,733,000

908,000

312,000

Recoverable Oxide (lb)

1,550,000

313,000

888,000

132,000

844,000

130,000

10,434,000

2,002,000

688,000

* Metal or oxide prices are the two-year trailing average to May 31, 2013 (three-years for Tm2O3). Sources: Metal-pages.com; Asianmetal.com; USGS. Metal prices vary among various commodity information sources and, in all conflicting instances, the lower pricing was used. The 2011 and 2012 drilling included an appropriate number of analytical standards, blanks and duplicates, and no analytical issues were identified. Re-analysis of historic drill core included an appropriate number of analytical standards, blanks and duplicates, and no analytical issues were identified. ton=short ton; lb=pound; kg=kilogram; Recoverable metal/oxide stated to nearest 1000kg or 1000lb. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the mineral resources reported herein will be converted into a mineral reserve. See additional cautionary language at end of this press release.

 


 

Buckton Indicated Mineral Resource

Lower Portion - in Second White Speckled Shale Formation

Mineralized Shale (tons)

72,013,000

 

MoO3

Ni

U3O8

V2O5

Zn

Cu

Co

Li2CO3

Raw Grade (ppm)

100.4

142.9

29.1

1315.5

273.6

74.4

23.4

298.7

Recovery %

3

64

70

7

52

25

72

17

Recoverable Grade (ppm)

3.0

91.5

20.3

92.1

142.3

18.6

16.9

50.8

Metal/Oxide Price* (US$/lb)

12.89

8.34

60.74

5.89

0.94

3.64

14.38

2.82

Recoverable metal/oxide (kg)

197,000

5,976,000

1,329,000

6,016,000

9,294,000

1,215,000

1,103,000

3,318,000

Recoverable metal/oxide (lbs)

434,000

13,175,000

2,930,000

13,263,000

20,490,000

2,679,000

2,432,000

7,315,000

 

 

La2O3

Ce2O3

Pr2O3

Nd2O3

Sm2O3

Eu2O3

Gd2O3

Tb2O3

Raw Grade (ppm)  

57.7

89.4

11.9

45.8

9.2

2.0

8.7

1.3

Recovery %

20

30

40

43

47

61

63

65

Recoverable Grade (ppm) 

11.5

26.8

4.8

19.7

4.3

1.2

5.5

0.9

Metal/Oxide Prices* (US$/kg)

44.58

43.20

140.41

156.16

68.16

2,742.11

105.78

2,190.48

Recoverable Oxide (kg)

754,000

1,752,000

310,000

1,286,000

283,000

79,000

357,000

56,000

Recoverable Oxide (lb)

1,662,000

3,862,000

683,000

2,835,000

624,000

174,000

787,000

123,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dy2O3

Ho2O3

Er2O3

Tm2O3

Yb2O3

Lu2O3

Y2O3

Sc2O3

ThO2

Raw Grade (ppm)  

7.8

1.6

4.3

0.6

4.1

0.6

54.9

14.3

11.6

Recovery %

65

64

62

60

58

55

67

24

12.5

Recoverable Grade (ppm) 

5.0

1.0

2.7

0.4

2.4

0.3

36.8

3.4

1.4

Metal/Oxide Prices* (US$/kg)

1,240.31

202.98

169.01

97.00

102.98

1,273.00

107.77

4,194.66

252.00

Recoverable Oxide (kg)

330,000

67,000

176,000

25,000

154,000

23,000

2,402,000

224,000

95,000

Recoverable Oxide (lb)

728,000

148,000

388,000

55,000

340,000

51,000

5,295,000

494,000

209,000

* Metal or oxide prices are the two-year trailing average to May 31, 2013 (three-years for Tm2O3). Sources: Metal-pages.com; Asianmetal.com; USGS. Metal prices vary among various commodity information sources and, in all conflicting instances, the lower pricing was used. The 2011 and 2012 drilling included an appropriate number of analytical standards, blanks and duplicates, and no analytical issues were identified. Re-analysis of historic drill core included an appropriate number of analytical standards, blanks and duplicates, and no analytical issues were identified. ton=short ton; lb=pound; kg=kilogram; Recoverable metal/oxide stated to nearest 1000kg or 1000lb. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the mineral resources reported herein will be converted into a mineral reserve. See additional cautionary language at end of this press release.

 

Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the mineral resources reported herein will be converted into a mineral reserve. An 'Inferred Mineral Resource' is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and reasonably assumed, but not verified, geological and grade continuity. The estimate is based on limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes. An 'Indicated Mineral Resource' is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics, can be estimated with a level of confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drillholes that are spaced closely enough for geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed. The metal recoveries reported represent preliminary mineral recovery testing results collated from the collective bench scale laboratory testwork completed by DNI to date and may not reflect actual process recoverability that might be achieved in a mineral production operation, all of which is the subject of ongoing studies.

 

The Qualified Persons in connection with the preparation of the Updated and Expanded Buckton Mineral Resource Study are Mr.Roy Eccles PGeol, Mr.Michael Dufresne PGeol, Mr.Steven Nicholls MAIG and Kyle McMillan PGeol, who are independent of DNI. The Qualified Person in connection with this press release and in respect of the Alberta polymetallic black shale projects is Mr. Shah� F.Sabag PGeo, President and CEO of DNI, who is responsible for verification and quality assurance of the exploration information disclosed in connection with the projects and this release.

 

Analyses by Activation Laboratories Ltd., Ancaster, ON. Canmet = Canmet Mining and Minerals Science Laboratories, Ottawa. The 2012 drill core analyses and re-analysis of historic core intercepts included an appropriate number of analytical standards, blanks and duplicates, and no analytical issues were identified. Analytical results from the 2012 drilling were announced on Jan31/2013, along with details of DNI's analytical quality assurance and quality control parameters. Prior resource estimates from the Buckton Zone were announced Oct24/2011, Jan16/2012, Sep12/2012 and Jan11/ 2013. Ton=short ton; lb = pound; tonne = metric tonne = 1000kg.

 

Metal/Oxide commodity prices used to establish bulk recoverable values for cut-off grade thresholding tests are the two year trailing average to May 31, 2013 (three year for Tm Geomega 2011). Metals/Oxide commodity price data for Mo-V-Co from www.metal-pages.com, Ni-Zn-Cu from www.northernminer.com,  U from www.cameco.com, Li from www.asianmetal.com, La-Ce-Pr-Nd-Sm-Eu-Gd-Tb-Dy-Y from www.metal-pages.com, Ho-Er-Yb-Lu-Sc from www.asianmetal.com, Th per USGS  Mineral Commodity Summaries, Tm from Montviel Core Zone REE resources study 2011 by SGS Canada Inc. Metal prices vary among various commodity information sources and in all conflicting instances the lower pricing was used.

 

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

 

DNI - TSX Venture

DG7 - Frankfurt

Issued: 74,857,022

 

For further information, contact:

DNI Metals Inc. - Shahe Sabag, President & CEO or Denis Clement, Chairman - 416-595-1195

email ir@dnimetals.com. Also visit www.dnimetals.com

 

We seek Safe Harbour. This announcement includes forward looking statements. While these statements represent DNI's best current judgment, they are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary, including risk factors listed in DNI's Annual Information Form and its MD&As, all of which are available from SEDAR and on its website.
 
Data and Statistics for these countries : Canada | Finland | Sweden | All
Gold and Silver Prices for these countries : Canada | Finland | Sweden | All

Polymet Mining Corp

CODE : POM.TO
ISIN : CA7319161021
Follow and Invest
Add to watch list Add to your portfolio Add or edit a note
Add Alert Add to Watchlists Add to Portfolio Add Note
ProfileMarket
Indicators
VALUE :
Projects & res.
Press
releases
Annual
report
RISK :
Asset profile
Contact Cpy

Polymet is a copper and nickel development stage company based in Canada.

Polymet holds various exploration projects in USA.

Its main exploration property is NORTHMET in USA.

Polymet is listed in Canada, in Germany and in United States of America. Its market capitalisation is CA$ 909.5 millions as of today (US$ 727.2 millions, € 637.0 millions).

Its stock quote reached its lowest recent point on March 27, 2020 at CA$ 0.26, and its highest recent level on September 04, 2020 at CA$ 8.30.

Polymet has 318 549 984 shares outstanding.

Your feedback is appreciated, please leave a comment or rate this article.
Rate : Average note :0 (0 vote) View Top rated
 
In the News and Medias of Polymet Mining Corp
7/5/2008Duluth Complex: A World-Class Value Play
9/7/2006Follow up
Financings of Polymet Mining Corp
6/27/2013Reminder to Shareholders Rights Offering Closes at 5:00 pm E...
5/24/2013Announces Terms of US$60=2E5 Million Rights Offering and Fil...
12/6/2011Closes $20 Million Private Placement With Glencore
11/30/2011and Glencore Agree to Extend Debentures
1/18/2011Polymet Closes First $10 Million Tranche of Glencore Financi...
11/17/2009Modifies Terms of Existing Glencore Warrants
Nominations of Polymet Mining Corp
1/25/2011Names Brad Moore Executive VP-Environmental and Governmental...
2/19/2008 Appoints Frank Sims and Joe Scipioni to the Board
3/13/2007Appoints Chief Operating Officer and NorthMet Senior Constru...
Financials of Polymet Mining Corp
6/15/2016Reports First Quarter Fiscal 2017 Results
4/22/2016Reports Fiscal 2016 Results
12/16/2015Reports Third Quarter Fiscal 2016 Results
9/4/2015Reports Second Quarter Fiscal 2016 R =?ISO-8859-1?Q?esults,=...
12/5/2013Reports Third Quarter Fiscal 2014 Results
9/11/2013Reports Second Quarter Fiscal 2014 Results
6/11/2013Reports First Quarter Fiscal 2014 Results-Rights Offering Ma...
9/7/2012Reports Second Quarter Fiscal 2013 Results
6/18/2012Reports First Quarter Fiscal 2013 Results
9/8/2011Reports Second Quarter Fiscal 2012 Results
7/6/2011Reports First Quarter Fiscal 2012 Results: Update on State o...
5/7/2011Announces Fiscal 2011 Full-Year Results
4/30/2008Reports Fiscal 2008 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results
Project news of Polymet Mining Corp
7/14/2016Project Update at Shareholders' Meeting
12/16/2013Federal Wetlands Permit Application Published for PolyMet Pr...
8/28/2013and E&D: Polymetal swings to a loss and Ncondezi gets permit...
7/29/2013and Finance: Polymetal to take writedown of up to US$340m an...
5/30/2013(Northmet)Reports Further Progress at NorthMet Copper-Nickel Project R...
2/14/2013(Northmet)Improves NorthMet Project
11/7/2012Drilling Commences at the Croydon Polymetallic Project
2/3/2011(Northmet)Simplifies Metallurgical Process at NorthMet Project
9/26/2007(Northmet)Reports a 51% Interim Increase in Reserves at NorthMet
8/9/2007(Northmet) Reports a 51% Increase in Mineral Resources at NorthMet
7/10/2007(Northmet) Drill Program Confirms Expansion of "Magenta" Zone and Demo...
Corporate news of Polymet Mining Corp
7/14/2016PolyMet Project Update at Shareholders’ Meeting
7/11/2016PolyMet Submits Water-Related Permit Applications to the Sta...
6/15/2016PolyMet Reports First Quarter Fiscal 2017 Results
4/22/2016PolyMet Reports Fiscal 2016 Results
1/27/2016PolyMet Secures Additional US$11 Million Loan From Glencore
12/16/2015PolyMet Reports Third Quarter Fiscal 2016 Results
11/6/2015IIROC Trade Resumption - POM
11/6/2015PolyMet Final EIS Completed - Demonstrates Project Meets Env...
11/6/2015IIROC Trading Halt - POM
9/4/2015PolyMet Reports Second Quarter Fiscal 2016 Results, Progress...
7/17/2015PolyMet Reports Accomplishments at Annual Shareholders’ meet...
7/16/2015PolyMet Reports Accomplishments at Annual Shareholders' Meet...
12/15/2014PolyMet Reports Third Quarter Fiscal 2015 Results - Project ...
12/15/2014PolyMet Reports Third Quarter Fiscal 2015 Results Project Up...
10/8/2014PolyMet Final EIS "Early Spring" 2015
9/9/2014PolyMet Reports Second Quarter Fiscal 2015 Results
6/11/2014PolyMet Reports First Quarter Fiscal 2015 Results
4/25/2014PolyMet Reports Fiscal 2014 Results
4/25/2014PolyMet and Glencore Agree to Extend Term of US$32.2 Million...
3/13/2014IIROC Trade Resumption - POM
3/13/2014IIROC Trading Halt - POM (all issues)
2/24/2014DNI Metals - Operating in a Polymetallic Paradise
12/6/2013Achieves Key Milestone in Environmental Review Process
12/5/2013DNI REPORTS POSITIVE PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT FOR ITS...
11/6/2013Three-Week Federal Government Shutdown Results in Two-Week P...
9/11/2013DNI'S RESOURCE STUDY REPORT UPDATING AND EXPANDING THE MINER...
8/27/2013DNI EXPANDS BUCKTON ZONE INFERRED RESOURCE TO 4.9 BILLION TO...
8/26/2013Significant Progress for PolyMet Environmental Review
8/23/2013Minnesota DNR Announces Publication Date for PolyMet Supplem...
7/25/2013s Investors With Exclusive Interview With The Wall Street An...
7/10/2013Reports Strong Positioning at Shareholders' Meeting
7/5/2013Closes Successful Rights Offering; Financed to Complete Perm...
6/19/2013on PolyMet Rights Offering-Informationfor Those Who Have Not...
5/13/2013Reports Completion of Drafting of Preliminary EIS
4/23/2013Reports Fiscal 2013 Results
4/19/2013(Northmet)NorthMet News - PolyMet Mining, Inc.
4/10/2013US$60 Million Common Share Rights Offering to All Shareholde...
1/11/2013DNI CONSOLIDATES AND EXPANDS BUCKTON RESOURCE TO 3.49 BILLIO...
12/11/2012(Northmet)NorthMet News - PolyMet Mining, Inc.
11/1/2012s Technical Disclosure
10/15/2012Closes $10 Million Third Tranche of Glencore Financing
10/10/2012Reports Successful Water Treatment Pilot Plant
9/13/2012(Northmet)NorthMet News - PolyMet Mining, Inc.
9/11/2012Strengthens Permitting Expertise
7/17/2012Focuses Corporate Leadership Team in Minnesota
7/11/2012Announces Results of Shareholders' Meeting
6/28/2012Form 20-F Availability
6/21/2012Strengthens Leadership Team
6/15/2012for IMMEDIATE Dissemination - Verbatim - Kootenay and Pinecr...
6/14/2012Reports Technical Disclosure Review
5/23/2012Reports Progress on Environmental Review
5/1/2012Reports Fiscal 2012 Results
3/19/2012DNI EXTRACTS METALS FROM ITS ALBERTA POLYMETALLIC SHALES USI...
2/29/2012Acquires Control of Wetlands
2/13/2012Clarifies Status of Environmental Review Following Misleadin...
2/1/2012s Status of Environmental Review
1/16/2012DNI ANNOUNCES 250 MILLION TON INFERRED RESOURCE FOR REE-Y-Sc...
12/14/2011orate and Project Update; Third Quarter Fiscal 2012 Results
11/30/2011Agrees to Sell US$20 Million of Common Shares to Glencore
10/12/2011Everett Resources Commences Second Phase 2,500 Meter Drill P...
9/19/2011(Northmet)s Progress on NorthMet Environmental Review
7/15/2011Closes Second $10 Million Tranche of Glencore Financing
6/30/2011Closes IRRRB Loan
6/17/2011Reports Mailing of Information Circular
5/5/2011to File Financial Statements on or Before May 9, 2011
5/3/2011Announces Delay in Filing Year-End Financial Statements
4/15/2011s Status of Environmental Review
6/25/2010EIS-Path Forward to Completion Announced
3/15/2010Statement on Environmental Review Timeline
3/4/2010Environmental Review Process Clarified
2/23/2010s NorthMet Environmental Review Progress
1/26/2010Receives Second Installment From Glencore
11/24/2009Closes Financing-Project Update
11/17/2009Sells US$25 Million of Common Shares to Glencore
10/28/2009Environmental Impact Statement Published
10/5/2009Draft EIS Available the Week of October 19, 2009
10/1/2009s EIS Publication Schedule
9/2/2009Draws Fourth Tranche of Loan From Glencore
8/27/2009Files US$500 Million Universal Shelf Registration
6/19/2009Draws Third Tranche of Loan From Glencore
12/24/2008Draws Second Tranche of Loan From Glencore
12/22/2008Receives Draft EIS From Department of Natural Resources
9/24/2008EIS and Glencore Update
9/4/2008and Glencore Sign Strategic Marketing Agreement
8/12/2008Minnesota DNR Updates PolyMet EIS Progress
6/12/2008s EIS Progress
6/2/2008Present at the New York Society of Security Analysts' 8th An...
5/20/2008Capital and Operating Costs
2/15/2008Updates EIS Schedule for Its Copper-Nickel-Precious Metals P...
2/5/2008Strengthens Minnesota Focus
11/5/2007Present at Third Annual Sanders Morris Harris Investor Growt...
10/4/2007Hosts Analyst and Investor Tour
9/14/2007Quarterly Financials
9/4/2007Signs Northmet Construction Labor Agreement
8/21/2007Expands NorthMet Management Team
5/16/2007Updates NorthMet Environmental Review
5/7/2007Research Capital Report
5/7/2007Announces Retirement of Warren Hudelson Receives Approval fo...
3/21/2007Financial Adviser Engages NorthMet Independent Engineer
Comments closed
 
Latest comment posted for this article
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
TORONTO (POM.TO)AMEX (PLM)
2.86+0.53%2.09-0.48%
TORONTO
CA$ 2.86
10/12 16:15 0.020
0.53%
Prev close Open
2.84 2.82
Low High
2.82 2.86
Year l/h YTD var.
 -  -
52 week l/h 52 week var.
1.03 -  2.87 3.62%
Volume 1 month var.
4,178 0.175%
24hGold TrendPower© : 30
Produces
Develops
Explores for
 
 
 
Analyse
Interactive chart Add to compare
Interactive
chart
Print Compare Export
You must be logged in to use the porfolio and watchlists (free)
Top Newsreleases
MOST READ
Annual variation
DateVariationHighLow
20241.96%
2023-22.65%3.761.01
20220.56%6.153.05
2021-15.49%6.713.28
20201252.38%8.300.26
 
5 years chart
 
3 months chart
 
3 months volume chart
 
 
Mining Company News
Plymouth Minerals LTDPLH.AX
Plymouth Minerals Intersects Further High Grade Potash in Drilling at Banio Potash Project - Plannin
AU$ 0.12-8.00%Trend Power :
Santos(Ngas-Oil)STO.AX
announces expected non-cash impairment
AU$ 7.82+1.69%Trend Power :
Oceana Gold(Au)OGC.AX
RELEASES NEW TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE HAILE GOLD MINE
AU$ 2.20+0.00%Trend Power :
Western Areas NL(Au-Ni-Pl)WSA.AX
Advance Notice - Full Year Results Conference Call
AU$ 3.86+0.00%Trend Power :
Canadian Zinc(Ag-Au-Cu)CZN.TO
Reports Financial Results for Q2 and Provides Project Updates
CA$ 0.12+4.55%Trend Power :
Stornoway Diamond(Gems-Au-Ur)SWY.TO
Second Quarter Results
CA$ 0.02+100.00%Trend Power :
McEwen Mining(Cu-Le-Zn)MUX
TO ACQUIRE BLACK FOX FROM PRIMERO=C2=A0
US$ 11.04+1.38%Trend Power :
Rentech(Coal-Ngas)RTK
Rentech Announces Results for Second Quarter 2017
US$ 0.20-12.28%Trend Power :
KEFIKEFI.L
Reduced Funding Requirement
GBX 0.56+3.70%Trend Power :
Lupaka Gold Corp.LPK.V
Lupaka Gold Receives First Tranche Under Amended Invicta Financing Agreement
CA$ 0.06+0.00%Trend Power :
Imperial(Ag-Au-Cu)III.TO
Closes Bridge Loan Financing
CA$ 2.52+0.00%Trend Power :
Guyana Goldfields(Cu-Zn-Pa)GUY.TO
Reports Second Quarter 2017 Results and Maintains Production Guidance
CA$ 1.84+0.00%Trend Power :
Lundin Mining(Ag-Au-Cu)LUN.TO
d Share Capital and Voting Rights for Lundin Mining
CA$ 15.92-0.81%Trend Power :
Canarc Res.(Au)CCM.TO
Canarc Reports High Grade Gold in Surface Rock Samples at Fondaway Canyon, Nevada
CA$ 0.24+2.13%Trend Power :
Havilah(Cu-Le-Zn)HAV.AX
Q A April 2017 Quarterly Report
AU$ 0.19-7.32%Trend Power :
Uranium Res.(Ur)URRE
Commences Lithium Exploration Drilling at the Columbus Basin Project
US$ 6.80-2.86%Trend Power :
Platinum Group Metals(Au-Cu-Gems)PTM.TO
Platinum Group Metals Ltd. Operational and Strategic Process ...
CA$ 1.90+1.60%Trend Power :
Devon Energy(Ngas-Oil)DVN
Announces $340 Million of Non-Core Asset Sales
US$ 52.12+1.34%Trend Power :
Precision Drilling(Oil)PD-UN.TO
Announces 2017Second Quarter Financial Results
CA$ 8.66-0.35%Trend Power :
Terramin(Ag-Au-Cu)TZN.AX
2nd Quarter Report
AU$ 0.03+0.00%Trend Power :