Section 1 Sampling techniques and data

(criteria in this group apply to all succeeding groups)

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Sampling techniques.

 Nature and quality of sampling (EG cut channels, random chips or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.

 Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

 Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where "industry standard" work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg "reverse

circulation drilling was used to obtain 1m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30g charge for fire assay"). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling

problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

Soil samples were taken from approx. 10cm depth on a 200m x 400m grid over an area of

24km2 in the south west portion of EL4475.

Soil sample locations were determined using a hand held GPS with an accuracy of ±5 metres. Coordinates are in UTM grid (AGD84

Z53).

Soil samples were collected at 200m spacing along east west oriented lines spaced 400m apart.

A "pelican pick" was used to dig a ~10cm deep rectangular hole, then the soil from the bottom of the hole was sieved through a -

80mesh (180microns) fraction sieve, and approximately 100gms collected in a paper packet for analysis.

Drilling techniques.

 Drill type (eg. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka etc.) and details (eg. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of Diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.).

n/a.

Drill sample recovery.

 Whether core and chip sample recoveries have been properly recorded and results assessed.



 Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.

 Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

n/a

Logging.

 Whether core and chip samples have been logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.

 Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel etc.) photography.

 The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.

n/a

Logging is qualitative. The soil type at each location was recorded on a sample sheet together with sample no. and coordinates.

n/a

Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation.

 If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.

 If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split etc. and whether sampled wet or dry.

 For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.

 Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.

 Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected.

 Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grainsize of the material being sampled.

n/a

n/a

Samples are sieved in the field to required sized fraction and no further sample prep required except for drying.

Duplicate sieved samples are collected approx. every 20 samples

n/a

Sieving to -80 mesh is considered appropriate for the analysis method employed.

Quality of assay data and laboratory tests.

 The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

 For geophysical tools, spectrometer, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation etc.

 Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie. lack of bias) and precision have been established.

Soil sample analysis is undertaken by Intertek in Perth. Internal certified laboratory QAQC is undertaken including check samples, blanks and internal standards.

Samples were analysed using Intertek's proprietary Terra Leach (TL1) partial leach method (ICP-MS, ICP-OES & AA) for Au and pathfinder elements (Ag, Au, As , Cd, Co, Cu, Mo, Ni, Pb, S, Sb, Sn & Zn)

n/a

The laboratory uses a number of internal quality control procedures in place (eg. standards, blanks, duplicates etc.). Tasman inserts one duplicate sieved sample in every

20 samples. Proprietary standard samples are not useful for a partial leach method and

hence are not included.

Verification of sampling and assaying.

 The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.

 The use of twinned holes.

 Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

 Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

n/a

n/a

Individual sample numbers are generated and assigned to proposed coordinates. Sample numbers are then used to match assays when received from the laboratory. Verification of data is managed and checked by company personnel with extensive experience. All data is stored electronically, with industry standard systems and backups.

Data is not subject to any adjustments.

Location of data points.

 Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

 Specification of the grid system used.

 Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

Soil sample locations were determined by hand held GPS and are accurate to approximately +/- 5m (northing and easting);

The grid system used is AGD 84 Zone 53 which matches that on the available 1:50,000 topographic map.

n/a

Data spacing and distribution.

 Data spacing for reporting of Exploration

Results.

 Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

 Whether sample compositing has been applied.

Sample spacing is considered quite adequate for a first pass geochemical programme.

n/a

n/a

Orientation of data in relation to geological structure.

 Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.

 If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

n/a

n/a

Sample security

 The measures taken to ensure sample security.

Soil samples are collected in individually numbered paper packets and packed into sealed card board boxes for transport. Tasman staff deliver samples to Intertek Adelaide for dispatch to the Intertek laboratory in Perth where the samples are analysed.

Audits or reviews.

 The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.

No review or audits of sampling techniques or data have been conducted.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results (Parkinson Dam Project, EL 4475)

(criteria listed in the preceding group apply also to this group)

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Mineral tenement and land tenure status.

Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.

The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

Exploration Licence No 4475, is located approximately 60km west of Port Augusta, South Australia and is owned 100% by Tasman Resources Ltd.

There are no partnerships or royalties involved. The EL is covered by the Barngala native title claim and a native title mining agreement is currently being finalised. Tasman has conducted a successful heritage clearance over the area currently under investigation by Tasman to permit initial drilling activities. There are no historical or wilderness sites or national parks or known environmental settings that affect the prospect.

Tasman has secure tenure over the EL at the time of reporting and there are no known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

Exploration done by other parties.

Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.

Prior to Tasman's tenure limited uranium exploration had been carried out within the tenement area by PNC Exploration during the

1980's.

Calcrete sampling was completed by Helix Resources over the southern portion of the tenement area in the early 2000's and several anomalous calcrete values were obtained which attracted Tasman to the area. In 2005 Tasman discovered outcropping epithermal veining within the Corunna Conglomerate. Subsequent drilling intersected epithermal Au-Ag-Pb-Zn mineralisation associated with the veining.

Geology.

Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.

The geology comprises Mesoproterozoic Corunna Conglomerate which forms a north plunging syncline overlying Palaeo- proterozoic metasediments and is in faulted contact with the Gawler Range Volcanics to the north. Tasman is exploring the area for epithermal Au-Ag-base metal mineralisation

associated with the margin of the Gawler

Range Volcanics.

Drill hole

information.

A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:

 Easting and northing of the drill hole collar

 Elevation or RL (Reduced Level- elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar

 Dip and azimuth of the hole

 Down hole length and interception depth

 Hole length

n/a

Data aggregation methods.

 In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually material and should be stated.

 Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.

 The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.

 n/a

Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths.

 These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results.

 If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known,

its nature should be reported.

 If it is not known and only the down-hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg.

'downhole length, true width not known').

 n/a

Diagrams.

 Where possible, maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any material discovery being reported if such

diagrams significantly clarify the report.

 n/a

Balanced reporting.

 Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.

All available geochemically anomalous data has been reported for this soil-sampling program.

Other substantive exploration data.

 Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results;

geochemical survey results; bulk samples

- size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.

Any other substantive exploration data such as pertinent geological observations, petrographic data, geochronological data, geophysical results are included where appropriate.

Further work.

 The nature and scale of planned further work (eg. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).

 Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the

main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information

is not commercially sensitive

The nature and timing of planned further work is included in the report.