13 January 2009
Initial JORC Code Resource for Mulga
Rock Deposits
Energy and Minerals
Australia Limited (ASX: EMA), a Western Australian focused uranium
development company, is pleased to announce its initial JORC Code Uranium
Resource estimate for the Mulga Rock Deposits
(?MRD?). MRD contains the Ambassador, Emperor and Shogun deposits.
The initial JORC Code Inferred
Resource estimate is 24,520 tonnes of U3O8
at a cut-off grade of 200ppm U3O8.
The Inferred Resource estimate, at
various cut off grades, includes:
U3O8 Cut off
(ppm)
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
U3O8 Grade
(ppm)
|
Contained U3O8 (t)
|
Contained U3O8 (Mlb) *
|
200
|
44.36
|
550
|
24,520
|
54.06
|
300
|
35.22
|
630
|
22,220
|
48.99
|
500
|
18.63
|
850
|
15,810
|
34.86
|
700
|
10.31
|
1,060
|
10,930
|
24.10
|
* -
Tonnes are metric (2,204.62 pounds)
Note: Appropriate rounding has
been applied
The Resource estimate was prepared
by Coffey Mining using a database of available historic uranium chemical assays
and equivalent grades from radiometric data compiled by EMA..
The Resource estimate incorporates
the results from 766 of 2,012 holes drilled prior to EMA acquiring the
project. Future resource estimates will use data from drilling programmes completed in 2008 and those planned for 2009.
Coffey
Mining noted that there is evidence for another mineralised
zone below the main zones modeled at Ambassador and Emperor. However
the quality and quantity of the drill hole data
was not sufficient to allow inclusion of this zone in the Resource
estimate.
Historical
drilling data outside of the initial resource areas indicates
the potential for further mineralisation to be
defined once more drilling has been undertaken.
The highlight of the Resource work
is the delineation of high grade uranium mineralisation
at the Ambassador deposit of 7.63 Mt at 960 ppm
U3O8 for 7,290 tonnes of
contained U3O8 above a 500ppm U3O8 lower
cut-off. The uranium mineralisation is
generally 40 metres free dig below surface and
averages 2.5 metres thick. High grade mineralisation was also identified at both the Emperor and
Shogun deposits.
This initial estimate highlights
Ambassador as the ideal high grade first mine target. EMA now plans to:
?
initiate an open pit Scoping Study that will
initially focus on Ambassador, with a target production rate of 1,000 tonnes of U3O8 per year.
?
undertake metallurgical
studies on the Ambassador deposit to complement the Company?s appreciation of historical work.
?
infill drill the high grade mineralisation of the Ambassador deposit to improve
resource classification and increase base metal information.
?
extension drill within the known mineralisation at Ambassador that is presently outside
the resource estimate boundary (includes deeper zones). This
activity has been approved by the Department of Industry and
Resources.
?
continue drill programmes at Emperor and Shogun to achieve expansion
of the Resource. The first drill programme
for this activity has been approved by the Department of Industry
and Resources.
The above programmes
are subject to appropriate funding arrangements.
The establishment of this initial
JORC Code compliant Resource, and the recent lifting of the ban on uranium
mining in Western Australia
are significant milestones towards the Company?s
target for production to commence in 2013.
Performance Shares
This Resource estimate has satisfied the first
and second performance milestones of Class A and B performance shares.
Subject to the Corporations Act, 55,501,695 Class A and 42,771,949 Class B
performance shares will convert into ordinary shares in the Company.
These ordinary shares will be subject to the same escrow provisions of the
original performance shares and will be escrowed until 23 May 2010.
Details of the performance shares and conversion rights are included
in the replacement Prospectus dated April 2008 and the 2008 Annual Report.
The
Class C performance shares remain unchanged and conversion is dependent on the
third performance milestone being the Company receiving a pre-feasibility study
in respect of the tenement (or any part of one or more of the tenements) on or
before 23 May 2013.
Chris Davis
|
Media contact:
|
Managing Director
|
Warrick Hazeldine
|
|
Purple Communication
|
13 January 2009
|
(08) 9485 1254
|
Geology and Mineralisation
The MRD are contained within a
tenement package owned by the Company covering about 1,120 km2.
The MRD comprise three separate deposits named Ambassador, Emperor and
Shogun. All are located within exploration licenses 39/876, 39/877,
39/1149, and prospecting licenses 39/4883 and 39/4884.
The MRD and associated base metal
and gold mineralisation are hosted by a package of
Middle Eocene carbonaceous sediments deposited in a small sedimentary basin
named the Narnoo
Basin.
The MRD uranium mineralisation typically comprises a tabular body developed
in a lignitic succession that includes interbedded claystone and
sandstone. It is thought that the mineralisation
is controlled by a combination of structural and stratigraphic
features. Thicker bodies of sandstone-hosted uranium mineralisation locally underlie the lignite.
Base metal (typically nickel,
cobalt and zinc) and gold mineralisation are
associated with (both within and below) the MRD uranium mineralisation.
Resource
Estimation and Methodology
Coffey
Mining was commissioned by the Company to undertake resource modeling for the
uranium endowment of the MRD. Only historical uranium data was presented
to Coffey Mining and no other commodities were considered for this initial
Resource estimation.
EMA prepared the drill hole database used in this initial Resource estimate utilising historical reports and data it has gathered from
work undertaken by previous explorers of the tenement package.
EMA has assumed responsibility for the validity of the historical assay
data. Coffey Mining completed an assessment of the supplied database,
checked selected drill holes against available hard copy reports, and
checked the database for gross errors. The following issues with
historical data are noted:
?
Due to the nature of
the uranium mineralisation, the degree of
radiochemical disequilibrium is likely to vary considerably between drill
holes and with depth down each drill hole.
?
Information for many of
the historical drill holes which have chemical assays available indicates
incomplete sampling (some of which may be due to core loss; some may be due to
historical data-entry issues). It was noted that available assay
information sometimes commenced or finished in high grade mineralisation (up to several thousands of ppm U3O8).
?
Hard copy reports were
not available for all the assay data in the current database. Further
investigation of historical data is required to improve the accuracy and
completeness of the database if suitable historical supporting information can
be sourced.
?
The accuracy of some historic drill
hole collar surveys is suspect due to the inherent inaccuracy of survey
practices at the time. The Company is continuing to uncover and re-survey
old drill holes to improve the accuracy of the database to contribute to future
Resource estimates.
?
Historical density data
indicates the dry density of the mineralised
intervals can vary between 0.5 t/m3
and 1.6 t/m3. Based upon an analysis of all historical density
data within mineralised intervals above 100ppm U (251
samples in total), an insitu dry bulk density of 0.9
t/m3 has been used to report the Resource estimate. Further
density test work is required to adequately define the density
characteristics of the three deposits. It is possible that future density
test work will change the density values for the individual deposits.
The
combination of the lack of any QAQC data for the historical assaying and the
incomplete sampling of many drill holes may limit the usefulness of portions of
the historical data for the use in higher-level resource classifications.
The
database presented to Coffey Mining contained 2,012 historical drill holes, of
which 766 drill holes with chemical and radiometric assays, for 43,605 metres, were directly included in the initial Resource
estimates. Of the 766 drill holes, 375 were HQ diamond drill holes, 382
were RC drill holes and 5 were aircore drill
holes.
The
historical diamond drill holes were typically sampled at 20 cm intervals using
quarter core. Uranium assaying was by either XRF or ICPMS. Of
the 375 diamond holes in the estimation region, 335 had chemical U assays.
Equivalent U3O8 (eU3O8)
grades based on factoring of the radiometric data was used for the remaining
holes.
The drill
hole spacing within the resource regions ranges from a nominal 500m X 220m,
200m X 200m and 200m X 100m with some infill drilling on sub 10m
spaced lines.
The
following comments relate to the estimation process:
?
Disequilibrium factors
were applied to the radiometric data based upon statistical studies
from each of the deposits. The disequilibrium factoring
applied for the 2009 resource estimate has resulted in satisfactory global
results but the local results are likely to be variable.
?
The assays used for estimation were
ranked according to 1) historical U chemical assays from diamond drill holes
and 2) factored historical radiometric assays (or U3O8).
The ranked combined assay data set is referred to as combU3O8.
?
The mineralised
zones were defined based upon a combination of stratigraphy
and a 100ppm combU3O8 lower cutoff. The mineralised zones were modeled to a minimum thickness of
1m. A single mineralised layer was modeled
for each of the deposits. The average thickness of the mineralised zones is 2.5m for Ambassador, 1.6m for Emperor
and 2.1m for Shogun.
?
There is evidence for another mineralised zone below the main zones modeled at Ambassador
and Emperor. However the quality and quantity of the drill hole data was not sufficient to allow inclusion of this zone
in the Resource estimate.
?
All assays within the mineralised zones were composited to 1m for statistical
analyses and estimation. Any missing intervals within the diamond drill
holes which had chemical assays were given a grade of 0ppm U3O8
prior to compositing.
?
A top cut of 4,500 ppm combU3O8 was applied to the 1m
composites for Ambassador, 2,500 ppm combU3O8
to Emperor, and 2,000 ppm combU3O8
to Shogun. The application of top cuts resulted in a 3% decrease in the declustered mean for all three deposits. The cut
composites were used in the estimation process.
?
Variography and search neighborhood analyses
were undertaken as inputs into the grade estimation process.
?
Three dimensional
Ordinary Kriging was selected by Coffey Mining as an
appropriate estimation method based on the quality, quantity and spacing of the
available historical data and the interpreted controls on the mineralisation.
?
A three-dimensional block model was
constructed in Surpac software for each of the
deposits covering all the interpreted mineralisation
zones and including suitable additional waste material to allow later optimisation studies.
?
Resource classification
was developed from confidence levels of key criteria including drilling
and sampling methods, assay methods, geological understanding, data
density, data and grade continuity, and the quality of the grade estimate.
At alternative cut off grades the Resource
estimates are as follows:
Mulga
Rock Deposits Uranium Inferred Resources as of 9 January 2009
Ordinary Kriging Grade Estimates within parent cells of 100m by 100m
by 10m
Using cut
combU3O8 composites (combined chemical and factored
radiometric grades) reported at a variety of lower grade cut-offs. A
global dry bulk density of 0.9 t/m3 was
used.
Deposit
|
U3O8 Cut off (ppm)
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
U3O8 Grade (ppm)
|
Contained U3O8 (t)
|
Contained U3O8 (Mlb) *
|
Ambassador
|
200
|
16.53
|
630
|
10,380
|
23.26
|
|
300
|
14.09
|
690
|
9,740
|
21.47
|
|
500
|
7.63
|
960
|
7,290
|
16.07
|
|
700
|
4.85
|
1,170
|
5,650
|
12.46
|
Emperor
|
200
|
24.14
|
500
|
11,970
|
26.39
|
|
300
|
18.27
|
580
|
10,510
|
23.17
|
|
500
|
8.94
|
770
|
6,880
|
15.17
|
|
700
|
4.18
|
980
|
4,090
|
9.02
|
Shogun
|
200
|
3.96
|
590
|
2,160
|
4.76
|
|
300
|
2.87
|
680
|
1,960
|
4.32
|
|
500
|
2.06
|
800
|
1,640
|
3.62
|
|
700
|
1.27
|
930
|
1,190
|
2.62
|
Total
|
200
|
44.36
|
550
|
24,520
|
54.06
|
|
300
|
35.22
|
630
|
22,220
|
48.99
|
|
500
|
18.63
|
850
|
15,810
|
34.86
|
|
700
|
10.31
|
1,060
|
10,930
|
24.10
|
* - Tonnes are metric
(2,204.62 pounds) Note: Appropriate rounding has been applied
The areas modeled in this
initial resource can be located by following the links below:
Ambassador deposit: http://www.purplecom.com.au/_content/documents/1043.JPG
Emperor deposit: http://www.purplecom.com.au/_content/documents/1044.JPG
Shogun deposit: http://www.purplecom.com.au/_content/documents/1045.JPG
The information in this announcement
that relates to exploration results and the resource database is based on
information compiled by Simon Fleming, who is a Fellow of
the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Fleming is a full
time employee of EMA. Mr Fleming has sufficient experience relevant
to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and
to the activity which is being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person
as defined in the 2004 Edition of the JORC ?Australasian Code for Reporting of
Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves?.. Mr Fleming
consents to the inclusion in the announcement of the matters based on his
information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this announcement
that relates to Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Neil Inwood, who is a Member of the Australasian
Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Inwood
is a full time employee of Coffey Mining. Mr Inwood has
sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of
deposit under consideration and to the activity which is being undertaken
to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the JORC
?Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and
Ore Reserves. Mr Inwood consents to the
inclusion in the announcement of the matters based on his information in
the form and context in which it appears.
About Energy and Minerals Australia
Energy and Minerals Australia
(ASX: EMA) is a Perth-based resource development company. EMA?s primary focus is the
development of the Mulga Rock Deposits, located about
770 kilometres east-northeast of Perth in Western
Australia.
The Mulga Rock Deposits were discovered by the
Japanese government company PNC Exploration in the early 1980s. The
project offers the advantage of established access to infrastructure such as
rail and airstrip, 1,000km of roads and cleared grid lines along with a
large water resource.
The EMA package also includes the nearby project areas
? Gunbarrel and Minigwal ? which combined cover more than 2,000km2 of
prospective area to provide a large and consolidated landholding in a highly
prospective region. The Company has an experienced board and management
team, which includes strong geological experience in the eastern Goldfields
region.
Issued by
Purple Communications
Level 3, 28
Kings Park Road, WEST PERTH
WA 6005
Ph: 08 9485 1254 Fax: 08 6263 0455
purple@purplecom.com.au