Energy and Minerals Australia

Published : January 13th, 2009

Initial JORC Code Resource for Mulga Rock Deposits

( 0 vote, 0/5 ) Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating Follow Company  
0
Send
0
comment

 

 

13 January 2009

 

Initial JORC Code Resource for Mulga Rock Deposits

 

Energy and Minerals Australia Limited (ASX:  EMA), a Western Australian focused uranium development company, is pleased to announce its initial JORC Code Uranium Resource estimate for the Mulga Rock Deposits (?MRD?).  MRD contains the Ambassador, Emperor and Shogun deposits.

The initial JORC Code Inferred Resource estimate is 24,520 tonnes of U3O8 at a cut-off grade of 200ppm U3O8.

The Inferred Resource estimate, at various cut off grades, includes:

 

U3O8 Cut off
(ppm)

Tonnes
(Mt)

U3O8 Grade
(ppm)

Contained U3O8 (t)

Contained U3O8 (Mlb) *

200

44.36

550

24,520

54.06

300

35.22

630

22,220

48.99

500

18.63

850

15,810

34.86

700

10.31

1,060

10,930

24.10

*  - Tonnes are metric (2,204.62 pounds)          Note: Appropriate rounding has been applied

 

The Resource estimate was prepared by Coffey Mining using a database of available historic uranium chemical assays and equivalent grades from radiometric data compiled by EMA..

The Resource estimate incorporates the results from 766 of 2,012 holes drilled prior to EMA acquiring the project.  Future resource estimates will use data from drilling programmes completed in 2008 and those planned for 2009.

Coffey Mining noted that there is evidence for another mineralised zone below the main zones modeled at Ambassador and Emperor.  However the quality and quantity of the drill hole data was not sufficient to allow inclusion of this zone in the Resource estimate.

Historical drilling data outside of the initial resource areas indicates the potential for further mineralisation to be defined once more drilling has been undertaken.

The highlight of the Resource work is the delineation of high grade uranium mineralisation at the Ambassador deposit of 7.63 Mt at 960 ppm U3O8 for 7,290 tonnes of contained U3O8 above a 500ppm U3O8 lower cut-off.  The uranium mineralisation is generally 40 metres free dig below surface and averages 2.5 metres thick.  High grade mineralisation was also identified at both the Emperor and Shogun deposits.

This initial estimate highlights Ambassador as the ideal high grade first mine target.  EMA now plans to:

 

?          initiate an open pit Scoping Study that will initially focus on Ambassador, with a target production rate of 1,000 tonnes of U3O8 per year.

?          undertake metallurgical studies on the Ambassador deposit to complement the Company?s appreciation of historical work.

?          infill drill the high grade mineralisation of the Ambassador deposit to improve resource classification and increase base metal information.

?          extension drill within the known mineralisation at Ambassador that is presently outside the resource estimate boundary (includes deeper zones).  This activity has been approved by the Department of Industry and Resources.

?          continue drill programmes at Emperor and Shogun to achieve expansion of the Resource.  The first drill programme for this activity has been approved by the Department of Industry and Resources.

 

The above programmes are subject to appropriate funding arrangements.

The establishment of this initial JORC Code compliant Resource, and the recent lifting of the ban on uranium mining in Western Australia are significant milestones towards the Company?s target for production to commence in 2013.

 

Performance Shares

This Resource estimate has satisfied the first and second performance milestones of Class A and B performance shares.  Subject to the Corporations Act, 55,501,695 Class A and 42,771,949 Class B performance shares will convert into ordinary shares in the Company.  These ordinary shares will be subject to the same escrow provisions of the original performance shares and will be escrowed until 23 May 2010.  Details of the performance shares and conversion rights are included in the replacement Prospectus dated April 2008 and the 2008 Annual Report.

CD signature.jpgThe Class C performance shares remain unchanged and conversion is dependent on the third performance milestone being the Company receiving a pre-feasibility study in respect of the tenement (or any part of one or more of the tenements) on or before 23 May 2013.

 

 

 

 

 

Chris Davis

Media contact:

Managing Director

Warrick Hazeldine

 

Purple Communication

13 January 2009 

(08) 9485 1254

 

 

 

Geology and Mineralisation

The MRD are contained within a tenement package owned by the Company covering about 1,120 km2.  The MRD comprise three separate deposits named Ambassador, Emperor and Shogun.  All are located within exploration licenses 39/876, 39/877, 39/1149, and prospecting licenses 39/4883 and 39/4884.

The MRD and associated base metal and gold mineralisation are hosted by a package of Middle Eocene carbonaceous sediments deposited in a small sedimentary basin named the Narnoo Basin.

The MRD uranium mineralisation typically comprises a tabular body developed in a lignitic succession that includes interbedded claystone and sandstone.  It is thought that the mineralisation is controlled by a combination of structural and stratigraphic features.  Thicker bodies of sandstone-hosted uranium mineralisation locally underlie the lignite.

Base metal (typically nickel, cobalt and zinc) and gold mineralisation are associated with (both within and below) the MRD uranium mineralisation.

 

 

Resource Estimation and Methodology

Coffey Mining was commissioned by the Company to undertake resource modeling for the uranium endowment of the MRD.  Only historical uranium data was presented to Coffey Mining and no other commodities were considered for this initial Resource estimation.

EMA prepared the drill hole database used in this initial Resource estimate utilising historical reports and data it has gathered from work undertaken by previous explorers of the tenement package.  EMA has assumed responsibility for the validity of the historical assay data.  Coffey Mining completed an assessment of the supplied database, checked selected drill holes against available hard copy reports, and checked the database for gross errors.  The following issues with historical data are noted:

 

?          Due to the nature of the uranium mineralisation, the degree of radiochemical disequilibrium is likely to vary considerably between drill holes and with depth down each drill hole. 

?          Information for many of the historical drill holes which have chemical assays available indicates incomplete sampling (some of which may be due to core loss; some may be due to historical data-entry issues).  It was noted that available assay information sometimes commenced or finished in high grade mineralisation (up to several thousands of ppm U3O8).

?          Hard copy reports were not available for all the assay data in the current database.  Further investigation of historical data is required to improve the accuracy and completeness of the database if suitable historical supporting information can be sourced.

?          The accuracy of some historic drill hole collar surveys is suspect due to the inherent inaccuracy of survey practices at the time.  The Company is continuing to uncover and re-survey old drill holes to improve the accuracy of the database to contribute to future Resource estimates.

?          Historical density data indicates the dry density of the mineralised intervals can vary between 0.5 t/m3 and 1.6 t/m3.  Based upon an analysis of all historical density data within mineralised intervals above 100ppm U (251 samples in total), an insitu dry bulk density of 0.9 t/m3 has been used to report the Resource estimate.  Further density test work is required to adequately define the density characteristics of the three deposits.  It is possible that future density test work will change the density values for the individual deposits.

 

The combination of the lack of any QAQC data for the historical assaying and the incomplete sampling of many drill holes may limit the usefulness of portions of the historical data for the use in higher-level resource classifications.

The database presented to Coffey Mining contained 2,012 historical drill holes, of which 766 drill holes with chemical and radiometric assays, for 43,605 metres, were directly included in the initial Resource estimates.  Of the 766 drill holes, 375 were HQ diamond drill holes, 382 were RC drill holes and 5 were aircore drill holes.   

The historical diamond drill holes were typically sampled at 20 cm intervals using quarter core.  Uranium assaying was by either XRF or ICPMS.  Of the 375 diamond holes in the estimation region, 335 had chemical U assays.  Equivalent U3O8 (eU3O8) grades based on factoring of the radiometric data was used for the remaining holes. 

The drill hole spacing within the resource regions ranges from a nominal 500m X 220m, 200m X 200m and 200m X 100m with some infill drilling on sub 10m spaced lines.

The following comments relate to the estimation process:

 

?          Disequilibrium factors were applied to the radiometric data based upon statistical studies from each of the deposits.   The disequilibrium factoring applied for the 2009 resource estimate has resulted in satisfactory global results but the local results are likely to be  variable.

?          The assays used for estimation were ranked according to 1) historical U chemical assays from diamond drill holes and 2) factored historical radiometric assays (or U3O8).  The ranked combined assay data set is referred to as combU3O8.

?          The mineralised zones were defined based upon a combination of stratigraphy and a 100ppm combU3O8 lower cutoff. The mineralised zones were modeled to a minimum thickness of 1m.  A single mineralised layer was modeled for each of the deposits.  The average thickness of the mineralised zones is 2.5m for Ambassador, 1.6m for Emperor and 2.1m for Shogun.

?          There is evidence for another mineralised zone below the main zones modeled at Ambassador and Emperor.  However the quality and quantity of the drill hole data was not sufficient to allow inclusion of this zone in the Resource estimate.

?          All assays within the mineralised zones were composited to 1m for statistical analyses and estimation.  Any missing intervals within the diamond drill holes which had chemical assays were given a grade of 0ppm U3O8 prior to compositing.

?          A top cut of 4,500 ppm combU3O8 was applied to the 1m composites for Ambassador, 2,500 ppm combU3O8 to Emperor, and 2,000 ppm combU3O8 to Shogun.  The application of top cuts resulted in a 3% decrease in the declustered mean for all three deposits.  The cut composites were used in the estimation process.

?          Variography and search neighborhood analyses were undertaken as inputs into the grade estimation process.

?          Three dimensional Ordinary Kriging was selected by Coffey Mining as an appropriate estimation method based on the quality, quantity and spacing of the available historical data and the interpreted controls on the mineralisation.

?          A three-dimensional block model was constructed in Surpac software for each of the deposits covering all the interpreted mineralisation zones and including suitable additional waste material to allow later optimisation studies.

?          Resource classification was developed from confidence levels of key criteria including drilling and sampling methods, assay methods, geological understanding, data density, data and grade continuity, and the quality of the grade estimate.

 

At alternative cut off grades the Resource estimates are as follows:

Mulga Rock Deposits Uranium Inferred Resources as of 9 January 2009

Ordinary Kriging Grade Estimates within parent cells of 100m by 100m by 10m

Using cut combU3O8 composites (combined chemical and factored radiometric grades) reported at a variety of lower grade cut-offs.  A global dry bulk density of 0.9 t/m3 was used.

 

Deposit

U3O8 Cut off (ppm)

Tonnes
(Mt)

U3O8 Grade (ppm)

Contained U3O8 (t)

Contained U3O8 (Mlb) *

Ambassador

200

16.53

630

10,380

23.26

 

300

14.09

690

9,740

21.47

 

500

7.63

960

7,290

16.07

 

700

4.85

1,170

5,650

12.46

Emperor

200

24.14

500

11,970

26.39

 

300

18.27

580

10,510

23.17

 

500

8.94

770

6,880

15.17

 

700

4.18

980

4,090

9.02

Shogun

200

3.96

590

2,160

4.76

 

300

2.87

680

1,960

4.32

 

500

2.06

800

1,640

3.62

 

700

1.27

930

1,190

2.62

Total

200

44.36

550

24,520

54.06

 

300

35.22

630

22,220

48.99

 

500

18.63

850

15,810

34.86

 

700

10.31

1,060

10,930

24.10

*  - Tonnes are metric (2,204.62 pounds)  Note: Appropriate rounding has been applied

 

The areas modeled in this initial resource can be located by following the links below:

 

Ambassador deposit: http://www.purplecom.com.au/_content/documents/1043.JPG

Emperor deposit: http://www.purplecom.com.au/_content/documents/1044.JPG

Shogun deposit: http://www.purplecom.com.au/_content/documents/1045.JPG

 

 

The information in this announcement that relates to exploration results and the resource database is based on information compiled by Simon Fleming, who is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.  Mr Fleming is a full time employee of EMA.  Mr Fleming has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which is being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the JORC ?Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves?..  Mr Fleming consents to the inclusion in the announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this announcement that relates to Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Neil Inwood, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.  Mr Inwood is a full time employee of Coffey Mining.  Mr Inwood has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which is being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the JORC ?Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves.  Mr Inwood consents to the inclusion in the announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

 

About Energy and Minerals Australia

Energy and Minerals Australia (ASX: EMA) is a Perth-based resource development company.  EMA?s primary focus is the development of the Mulga Rock Deposits, located about 770 kilometres east-northeast of Perth in Western Australia

The Mulga Rock Deposits were discovered by the Japanese government company PNC Exploration in the early 1980s.  The project offers the advantage of established access to infrastructure such as rail and airstrip, 1,000km of roads and cleared grid lines along with a large water resource.

The EMA package also includes the nearby project areas ? Gunbarrel and Minigwal ? which combined cover more than 2,000km2 of prospective area to provide a large and consolidated landholding in a highly prospective region.  The Company has an experienced board and management team, which includes strong geological experience in the eastern Goldfields region.

 

 

Issued by

 

Purple Communications

Level 3, 28 Kings Park Road, WEST PERTH WA 6005

Ph: 08 9485 1254 Fax: 08 6263 0455

purple@purplecom.com.au

 

 

Energy and Minerals Australia

EXPLORATION STAGE
CODE : EMA.AX
Follow and Invest
Add to watch list Add to your portfolio Add or edit a note
Add Alert Add to Watchlists Add to Portfolio Add Note
ProfileMarket
Indicators
VALUE :
Projects & res.
Press
releases
Annual
report
RISK :
Asset profile
Contact Cpy

Energy and Minerals is a development stage company based in Australia.

Its main exploration properties are GUNBARREL, MINIGWAL, NARNOO and MULGA ROCK DEPOSITS in Australia.

Energy and Minerals is listed in Australia. Its market capitalisation is AU$ 178.0 millions as of today (US$ 144.2 millions, € 122.2 millions).

Its stock quote reached its highest recent level on February 18, 2011 at AU$ 2.06, and its lowest recent point on January 08, 2015 at AU$ 0.06.

Energy and Minerals has 423 730 016 shares outstanding.

Your feedback is appreciated, please leave a comment or rate this article.
Rate : Average note :0 (0 vote) View Top rated
 
Project news of Energy and Minerals Australia
9/1/2009(Mulga Rock Deposits)Progress Update on Mulga Rocks Scoping Study
1/13/2009(Mulga Rock Deposits) Initial JORC Code Resource for Mulga Rock Deposits
Corporate news of Energy and Minerals Australia
12/13/2011BacTech Environmental Executes Final Contract with the Manit...
3/10/2011ARU:Presentation to Australia - Japan HLG on Energy and Mine...
7/15/2009$12.16 Million Capital Raising
5/14/2009Media Release: Supreme Court Victory
2/5/2009Media Release: Energy and Minerals Australia Targets 2013 St...
11/19/2008Response to Lifting of WA Uranium Mining Ban
6/17/2008First Assay Results Confirm Mulga Rock Strategy
Comments closed
 
Latest comment posted for this article
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
AUSTRALIA (EMA.AX)
0.420+0.00%
AUSTRALIA
AU$ 0.420
01/08 15:51 -
0%
Prev close Open
0.420 0.060
Low High
0.060 0.420
Year l/h YTD var.
 -  -
52 week l/h 52 week var.
- -  0.420 -%
Volume 1 month var.
49,950 -%
24hGold TrendPower© : -8
Produces
Develops
Explores for Uranium
 
 
 
Analyse
Interactive chart Add to compare
Interactive
chart
Print Compare Export
Last updated on : 12/16/2010
You must be logged in to use the porfolio and watchlists (free)
Top Newsreleases
MOST READ
Annual variation
DateVariationHighLow
 
5 years chart
 
3 months chart
 
3 months volume chart
 
 
Mining Company News
Plymouth Minerals LTDPLH.AX
Plymouth Minerals Intersects Further High Grade Potash in Drilling at Banio Potash Project - Plannin
AU$ 0.12-8.00%Trend Power :
Santos(Ngas-Oil)STO.AX
announces expected non-cash impairment
AU$ 7.71-0.52%Trend Power :
Oceana Gold(Au)OGC.AX
RELEASES NEW TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE HAILE GOLD MINE
AU$ 2.20+0.00%Trend Power :
Western Areas NL(Au-Ni-Pl)WSA.AX
Advance Notice - Full Year Results Conference Call
AU$ 3.86+0.00%Trend Power :
Canadian Zinc(Ag-Au-Cu)CZN.TO
Reports Financial Results for Q2 and Provides Project Updates
CA$ 0.12+4.55%Trend Power :
Stornoway Diamond(Gems-Au-Ur)SWY.TO
Second Quarter Results
CA$ 0.02+100.00%Trend Power :
McEwen Mining(Cu-Le-Zn)MUX
TO ACQUIRE BLACK FOX FROM PRIMERO=C2=A0
US$ 11.94+9.34%Trend Power :
Rentech(Coal-Ngas)RTK
Rentech Announces Results for Second Quarter 2017
US$ 0.20-12.28%Trend Power :
KEFIKEFI.L
Reduced Funding Requirement
GBX 0.54-2.55%Trend Power :
Lupaka Gold Corp.LPK.V
Lupaka Gold Receives First Tranche Under Amended Invicta Financing Agreement
CA$ 0.06+0.00%Trend Power :
Imperial(Ag-Au-Cu)III.TO
Closes Bridge Loan Financing
CA$ 2.69+13.03%Trend Power :
Guyana Goldfields(Cu-Zn-Pa)GUY.TO
Reports Second Quarter 2017 Results and Maintains Production Guidance
CA$ 1.84+0.00%Trend Power :
Lundin Mining(Ag-Au-Cu)LUN.TO
d Share Capital and Voting Rights for Lundin Mining
CA$ 15.60+1.83%Trend Power :
Canarc Res.(Au)CCM.TO
Canarc Reports High Grade Gold in Surface Rock Samples at Fondaway Canyon, Nevada
CA$ 0.24+0.00%Trend Power :
Havilah(Cu-Le-Zn)HAV.AX
Q A April 2017 Quarterly Report
AU$ 0.19+0.00%Trend Power :
Uranium Res.(Ur)URRE
Commences Lithium Exploration Drilling at the Columbus Basin Project
US$ 6.80-2.86%Trend Power :
Platinum Group Metals(Au-Cu-Gems)PTM.TO
Platinum Group Metals Ltd. Operational and Strategic Process ...
CA$ 1.87+5.65%Trend Power :
Devon Energy(Ngas-Oil)DVN
Announces $340 Million of Non-Core Asset Sales
US$ 52.61+0.98%Trend Power :
Precision Drilling(Oil)PD-UN.TO
Announces 2017Second Quarter Financial Results
CA$ 8.66-0.35%Trend Power :
Terramin(Ag-Au-Cu)TZN.AX
2nd Quarter Report
AU$ 0.04+5.56%Trend Power :