IGE Resources AB

Published : March 30th, 2011

Preliminary Economic Assessment adds resources and value to the R=F6nnb=E4cken Nickel Project

( 0 vote, 0/5 ) Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating Follow Company  
0
Send
0
comment
Keywords :   Cobalt |

10.06 AM CET / 30-Mar-2011 / IGE AB (OSE:IGE)

Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment adds resources and value to the R�nnb�cken Nickel Project

IGE Resources AB (OSE: IGE) today announced the completion of an updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the R�nnb�cken Nickel Project, Sweden, which is wholly owned by its subsidiary Nickel Mountain Resources AB.  

The Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) was prepared by SRK Consulting (Sweden) AB of Skellefte�, Sweden (�SRK�) on behalf of Nickel Mountain Resources AB (the �Company�).  The Preliminary Economic Assessment (�PEA�) is considered by SRK to conform to the Canadian regulations of National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.

HIGHLIGHTS:

  • Average annualized production of 26,000 tonnes of nickel and 760 tonnes of cobalt in concentrate based on an annual feed throughput of 30 million tonnes
  •  A Life of Mine (�LOM�) of 19 years with a potential for this to increase following the delineation of further resources by ongoing exploration.
  • Low stripping ratio of 0.72:1 (waste tonnes:ore tonnes)
  • High grade sulphide concentrate containing 28% nickel
  • Average LOM Mine Gate Operating Cost of US$4.16/lb (US$9,171/t) of nickel recovered to concentrate
  • Average LOM C1 Cash Operating Cost of US$5.55/lb (US$12,200/t) of payable nickel net of by-product credits
  • Estimated Start-up Capital Cost of US$1,161 million, including working capital.
  • Pre-tax NPV8% ranges from US$316 million to US$1,572 million between nickel prices of US$9.00/lb and US$12.00/lb generating an Internal Rate of Return (�IRR�) and cashflow range from 12.4% to 26.6% and from US$1,701 million to US$4,498million respectively. 
  • Further assessment of technical viability and economics of recovering magnetite from flotation tailings has the potential to further improve the economics of the Project.
  • The Company is aiming to complete a Pre-Feasibility Study on the Project by mid-2012.
  • Excellent infrastructure with close access to hydropower, power grid, roads, seaport and airport.
  • Application of conventional mining and processing technology provides for low technical risk
  • Low sulphide content and presence of buffering minerals reduce risks of environmental impact
  • Sweden has a long established mining industry fostered by low royalties (0.2%)

LOCATION & REGIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE

The R�nnb�cken Nickel Project is located in the northwest part of Sweden, about 30 km to the south of T�rnaby, V�sterbotten County.  The Project currently comprises three discrete deposits: R�nnb�cksn�set, Vinberget and Sundsberget.

The local resources and regional infrastructure include a connection point to the Swedish national grid less than 4 km away and the Ajaure hydro power plant, rated for 85 MW, located upstream of Lake Gardiken and approximately 12 km from the Project site by gravel road.  European route E12 is 14 km from the Project site, running in a southeast-northwest direction connecting Storuman to the port of Mo i Rana in Norway, 148 km from Project site.  The nearest rail access is at the town of Storuman, 127 km to the southeast. Finally, there is an airport at T�rnaby, 40km to the northwest, with daily scheduled flight service from Stockholm.

OPERATIONS

The PEA assumes that mining will take place concurrently from two open pits with the full production rate of 30 million tonnes per annum (Mtpa) being achieved in Year 2. Ore production commences at R�nnb�cksn�set and Vinberget while the Sundsberget deposit is scheduled to commence in Year 5 and is in full production by the time the Vinberget deposit is depleted.  This will ensure a consistent supply of ore to the processing plant. Mining will be a conventional open pit drilling, blasting, shovel, and truck operation and will most likely be contracted out.

The currently proposed processing flow sheet comprises crushing, grinding, flotation, and dewatering typical of  concentrator operations in Sweden and Finland. The conceptual concentrator design, together with associated capital and operating cost estimates, has been prepared by Outotec AB (Sweden). The mill will have a capacity of 30 million tpa or 3,750 tonnes per hour, and will produce approximately 95,000 tonnes per year of nickel concentrate at a mean grade of 28% Ni which will be transported from site to port via road.

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

SRK has constructed a pre-tax, pre-finance Technical Economic Model (TEM) to derive a Net Present Value (NPV) for the R�nnb�cken Nickel Project.  The economic analysis has been undertaken using US Dollar (US$) as the base currency. Any Swedish Krona (SEK) or Euro (EUR) derived costs have been converted at the exchange rates indicated in Table 1 below, which summarises all of the key financial assumptions made. Table 2 to Table 5 similarly summarise the technical and cost assumptions made and derived by SRK.

SRK notes in the PEA that its analysis is partially based on inferred resources and is therefore preliminary in nature.  Notably, inferred resources are considered too geologically speculative to be categorized as mineral reserves and there is no certainty that these will be converted to mineral reserves in due course or that the development, production, and economic forecasts on which the PEA is based will be realized. 

Table 1: Economic assumptions 

Description Unit Value
SEK:US$ exchange rate (unit) 8:1
US$:EUR exchange rate (unit) 1.125:1
Base case discount rate (%) 8
Base case nickel price (US$/lb) 9
Base case cobalt price (US$/lb) 15
LoM (years) 19

Table 2: Physical assumptions

Description Unit Value
Total ore mined (ktonnes) 528,030
Total waste mined (ktonnes) 379,943
Stripping ratio (w:o) 0.72


Table 3: Process, smelting and refining assumptions

Description Unit Value
Sulphide Ni recovery (%) 80
Ni grade in concentrate (%) 28
Contained Ni in concentrate (M lb) 1,018
Total treatment, refining & penalty charges (US$/t) 2.15

Table 4:  Operating Cost Assumptions

US$/t moved US$/t milled US$/lb contained Ni US$/lb payable Ni
Mining 1.79 3.10 1.61 1.73
General & Administration 0.22 0.38 0.20 0.21
Processing 2.54 4.41 2.29 2.46
On-going rehabilitation 0.07 0.13 0.07 0.07
Operating Cost at Mine Gate1  4.62 8.02 4.16 4.47
Concentrate Transport 0.13
TC/RC�s 1.20
By-product Credits -0.25
C1 Cash Cost2 5.55

1 Mine gate operating costs per pound of nickel recovered to concentrate

2 C1 costs include mining, processing, site admin, transportation, smelting and refining, net of by-product credits.

Table 5:  Capital Cost Estimate

Item US$ million
Process Plant 962
Infrastructure 150
Working Capital 49
Start-up Capital 1,161
Infrastructure Ongoing 156
Sustaining 231
Life of Mine Total 1,548

No capital costs have been assumed for mining equipment as mining is assumed to be undertaken by a contractor.  The estimate provides a summary level of the pre-production capital required for a 30 million t/a nickel concentrator, and includes the costs for the concentrator building, ancillary buildings, tailings dam, and the infrastructure including access roads and power line. 

CASH FLOW PROJECTION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

SRK�s NPV has been derived by the application of Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) techniques to the pre-tax, pre-finance cash flow.

A sensitivity analysis of the Project is included in SRK�s report to reflect various alternative scenarios.  Table 6 below presents the Project valuation sensitivity under various nickel price scenarios

Table 6: Project valuation sensitivity under different nickel price scenarios

Nickel Price (US$/lb)
Base Case
Unit 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Net pre-tax cash flow (US$M) (189) 756 1,701 2,627 3,572 4,498 5,442
NPV (@ 8% discount rate) (US$M) (534) (109) 316 732 1,157 1,572 1,997
IRR (%) 12.4 17.5 22.3 26.6 30.7
Payback (years) 5.5 4 3.5 3 2.5

MINERAL RESOURCES

Table 7 below presents an updated Mineral Resource Statement for the Project as a whole, combining the SRK statement for R�nnb�cksn�set and Vinberget, and an estimate produced by the Mitchell River Group for Sundsberget, which SRK has audited. As is typical of ultramafic-hosted disseminated nickel sulphide deposits, nickel is contained both in nickel sulphides and in silicates such as olivine and pyroxene. Conventionally with these deposits the reported nickel grades and recoveries are �Total Ni� which incorporates both the nickel in sulphides and silicates. For R�nnb�cken however, an analysis of the nickel in sulphide has been carried out through the use an analytical technique utilising a weak acid digest (hence the term Ni-AC). This has enabled evaluation of the project based on the metallurgical performance of the nickel in sulphides only, rather than considering the deportment of nickel in both sulphides and silicates. The rational is that a high proportion of the sulphide nickel is recovered in the flotation process whereas the non-sulphide nickel reports predominantly to tailings. The Ni-AC results here are referred to in this Executive Summary report as �Sulphide Ni� grades and recoveries.

Table 8 presents the iron resource for the Project. This has been classified as Inferred to reflect the current preliminary status of the mineralogical work. Specifically, in SRK�s opinion, more information is required to be collected to enable the proportion of the total Fe that has potential to be recoverable in a concentrate to be determined to the level of confidence required by a higher category.    

Both are presented according to CIM Guidelines for the reporting of Mineral Resources.


Table 7: Combined SRK-MRG Mineral Resource Statement, Ni & Co

DEPOSIT CLASSIFICATION TONNES(Mt) Ni-Total% Sulphide Ni% Sulphide Co% Ni-Totalktonnes Sulphide Ni ktonnes LOMStrip Ratio
R�nnb�cksn�set Measured 0.72:1
Indicated 225.4 0.176 0.101 0.003 397 227
Measured + Indicated 225.4 0.176 0.101 0.003 397 227
Inferred 86.5 0.177 0.100 0.003 153 86
Vinberget Measured 28.3 0.188 0.132 0.006 53 37
Indicated 23.3 0.183 0.133 0.006 43 31
Measured + Indicated 51.5 0.186 0.133 0.006 96 68
Inferred 6.8 0.183 0.138 0.007 12 9
Sundsberget Inferred 185.7 0.176 0.104 327 193
TOTAL
(Measured & Indicated)
Measured 28.3 0.188 0.132 0.006 53 37
Indicated 248.7 0.177 0.104 0.003 440 258
Measured + Indicated 277.0 0.178 0.107 0.004 493 295
TOTAL
(Inferred)
Inferred 279.0 0.176 0.104 0.003 491 288

Table 8: Combined SRK-MRG Mineral Resource Statement, Fe

DEPOSIT CLASSIFICATION TONNES (Mt) Fe % MAGNETITE Fe
ktonnes
R�nnb�cksn�set Inferred 311.9 5.46 11,410
Vinberget Inferred 58.3 5.17 2,019
Sundsberget Inferred 185.7 5.95 7,071
TOTAL Inferred 555.9 5.59 20,501

(1) The effective date of the Mineral Resource Statement for R�nnb�cksn�set and Vinberget is February 25, 2011. The effective date of the Mineral Resource Statement for Sundsberget is October 27, 2010.

(2) The Mineral Resource reported for R�nnb�cksn�set and Vinberget was constrained within a Lerchs-Grossman pit shell defined by a marginal cut-off-grade of 0.031% Ni-AC, a metal price of US$11/lb; slope angles of 50 and 48� respectively; a mining recovery of 95%; a mining dilution of 2.5%; a base mining cost of US$1.35/tonne and an incremental mine operating costs of US$0.07/tonne/10 m below the 450m reference RL and US$0.05/tonne/10m above the 450m reference RL); process operating costs of US$4.96/tonne ore; an effective charge per lb Ni in smelter feed of US$1.14, G&A costs of US$0.40/tonne ore and concentrate transport cost US$0.10/tonne.

(3) The Mineral Resource Estimate for Sundsberget was constrained within a Lerchs-Grossman pit shell defined by a marginal cut-off-grade of 0.05% Ni-AC, a metal price of US$9/lb; a slope angle of 52�; a mining recovery of 95%; a mining dilution of 2.5%; a base mining cost of US$1.0/tonne and an incremental mine operating costs of US$0.07/tonne/10 m below the 450 m reference RL and US$0.05/tonne/10m above the 450 m reference RL); process operating costs of US$4.24/tonne ore; an effective charge per lb Ni in smelter feed of US$2.26, G&A costs of US$1.0/tonne ore and concentrate transport costs of US$0.35/tonne.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS

There are four types of permits necessary to develop a deposit from the exploration stage to the development stage in Sweden. These are: exploration permits, exploitation concessions, environmental permits and building permits. The Company holds exploration permits for all three deposits Exploitation concessions have been granted over the Vinberget and R�nnb�cksn�set deposits, supported by environmental impact assessment studies. An application for exploitation concession for the Sundsberget deposit is expected to be filed in second quarter of 2011 and applications for environmental and building permits, are planned to be submitted to the regulatory authorities in third quarter of 2012 and first quarter 2014, respectively, supported by the appropriate studies in each case.

NEXT STEPS

The Company is now proposing to undertake a Pre-Feasibility Study on the Project, with targeted completion by mid-2012 at a budgeted cost of US$23.4 million.

Subject to the results of the Pre-Feasibility Study, the Company then expects to commence a full feasibility study in the second half of 2012 for completion towards the end of 2013 and has developed a preliminary budget for this work of US$68 million.

SRK CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SRK has recommended that:

  • Further assessment of the technical viability and economics of recovering of magnetite from the flotation tailings be undertaken as this has the potential to significantly improve the economics of the Project.
  • Exploration drilling be continued to evaluate the potential that still exists within the existing exploration permit areas.  Notably, in addition to target areas which are separate from the three currently identified resource areas, the R�nnb�cksn�set and Sundsberget deposits remain open at depth.

SRK also concluded that the Pre-Feasibility Study is justified by the potential of the Project and that the timing and budgets proposed for this by the Company are reasonable given the work planned to be undertaken. Further, whilst the justification for a full Feasibility Study following this will be dependent upon the results of the Pre-Feasibility Study, SRK noted that the preliminary budget proposed for this is of the correct order of magnitude for a Project of this nature and location.

QUALIFIED PERSONS

The PEA is based, for the R�nnb�cksn�set and Vinberget deposits, on the Mineral Resource Estimates prepared and signed off by Howard Baker, MSc., MAusIMM, Principal Mining Geologist and a qualified person under NI 43-101 for this Mineral Resource Estimation; and Johan Bradley, MSc., CGeol FGS, EurGeol, Senior Geologist and a qualified person under NI 43-101 for the geology and style of mineralisation under investigation, and was reviewed by Dr. Mike Armitage, CGeol FGS, CEng MIoM3, Principal Mining Geologist. Messrs Baker and Armitage are employees of SRK Consulting (UK) Ltd while Mr Bradley is an employee of SRK Consulting (Sweden) AB. All are consultants to Nickel Mountain Resources AB.  Messrs Baker, Bradley and Armitage are each a Qualified Person in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 (NI43-101) and consent to the inclusion in the presentation of the matters based on their information in the form and context in which it appears.

Dr Armitage has also reviewed and approved the content of this press release that relates to work undertaken and results produced by SRK.

The PEA is based, for the Sundsberget deposit, on the Mineral Resource Estimate prepared by Mitchell River Group which is based on information compiled by Mr. Lauritz Barnes and Mr. Lachlan Reynolds, who are both Members of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr. Barnes and Mr. Reynolds are consultants to Nickel Mountain Resources AB. Mr. Barnes and Mr. Reynolds have sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which they are undertaking and are each a Qualified Person in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 (NI43-101). Mr. Barnes and Mr. Reynolds consent to the inclusion in the presentation of the matters based on their information in the form and context in which it appears.

The report �Preliminary Economic Assessment for the R�nnb�cken Nickel Project, Sweden� will be made available in the first half of April 2011 at IGE Resource�s website at www.ige.se.   

Forward-Looking Statement

Some of the statements contained in this news release are forward-looking statements, such as statements that describe IGE Resources� future plans, intentions, objectives or goals, and specifically include but are not limited to statements regarding resource estimates, potential mineralization, future financial or operating performance, nickel prices, estimated future production, future costs, timing of pre-feasibility study and economic analysis. 

Actual results and developments may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements depending on, among others, such key factors as the possibility that actual circumstances will differ from the estimates and assumptions used in the potential of the R�nnb�cken Nickel Project, the environmental and social cost of proceeding with the project, uncertainty relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, general business and economic conditions, inflation, changes in exchange rates, fluctuations in commodity prices, delays in the development of the project, changes in legislation governing emissions into the air and water, waste, and the impact of future legislation and regulations on expenses, capital expenditures and taxation, changes in project parameters, variation in ore grade or recovery rates, delays in obtaining government approvals and necessary permitting, impurities in products and other risks involved in the mineral exploration and development industry.  

The forward-looking statements included in this document represent IGE Resources� views as of the date of this news release and subsequent events and developments may cause IGE Resources� views to change.  IGE Resources� disclaims any obligation to update forward-looking information except as required by law.  Readers should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.

For additional information, please contact:

Thomas Carlsson

CFO and acting CEO, IGE Resources AB

Phone: +46 8 402 28 00 / Mobile: +46 70 552 26 22

E-mail: thomas.carlsson@ige.se

Fredric Bratt

CEO Nickel Mountain Resources AB                                 

Phone: +46 8 402 28 00 / Mobile: +46 762 35 32 60                                 

E-mail: fredric.bratt@nickelmountain.se

IGE Resources AB (publ), is a Scandinavian company mainly focusing on Diamond exploration and production in Southern Africa.  IGE�s portfolio also includes one of Scandinavia�s largest nickel projects and gold exploration projects in Kenya. IGE is headquartered in Stockholm, and its shares are listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange (ticker: IGE).Please refer to www.ige.se for more detailed informationI



This information was brought to you by Cision http://www.cisionwire.com
http://www.cisionwire.com/ige-ab/updated-preliminary-economic-assessment-adds-resources-and-value-to-the-ronnbacken-nickel-project102246

The following files are available for download:


PDF
Data and Statistics for these countries : Finland | Kenya | Norway | Sweden | All
Gold and Silver Prices for these countries : Finland | Kenya | Norway | Sweden | All

IGE Resources AB

DEVELOPMENT STAGE
CODE : IGE.OL
ISIN : SE0000378119
Follow and Invest
Add to watch list Add to your portfolio Add or edit a note
Add Alert Add to Watchlists Add to Portfolio Add Note
ProfileMarket
Indicators
VALUE :
Projects & res.
Press
releases
Annual
report
RISK :
Asset profile
Contact Cpy

IGE Res. AB is a nickel exploration company based in Sweden.

IGE Res. AB develops nickel and diamonds in Angola.

Its main assets in development are CASSANGUIDI and LUXINGE in Angola and its main exploration properties are CARIANGO, LACAGE and LUANGUINGA in Angola, LONGATSHIMO RIVER and TSHIKAPA RIVER in Congo Dem. Rep. of, HARTS RIVER and BAKERVILLE in South Africa, LOLGORIEN, TURKANA and RONGO in Kenya and RÖNNBÄCKEN in Sweden.

Your feedback is appreciated, please leave a comment or rate this article.
Rate : Average note :0 (0 vote) View Top rated
 
Financings of IGE Resources AB
4/1/2011IGE terminates credit facility
Project news of IGE Resources AB
3/30/2011(Rönnbäcken)Preliminary Economic Assessment adds resources and value to ...
Corporate news of IGE Resources AB
5/7/2010A quarter of fundamental change
4/9/2010Change of name
Comments closed
 
Latest comment posted for this article
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
OSLO (IGE.OL)FRANKFURT (T9M.F)
3.00+0.00%0.030-23.08%
OSLO
3.00
12/30 16:25 -
0%
Prev close Open
3.00 2.96
Low High
2.92 3.07
Year l/h YTD var.
 -  -
52 week l/h 52 week var.
- -  3.00 -%
Volume 1 month var.
89,017 -%
24hGold TrendPower© : 23
Produces
Develops Diamonds
Explores for Diamonds - Gold - Nickel
 
 
 
Analyse
Interactive chart Add to compare
Interactive
chart
Print Compare Export
Last updated on : 5/26/2010
You must be logged in to use the porfolio and watchlists (free)
Top Newsreleases
MOST READ
Annual variation
DateVariationHighLow
 
5 years chart
 
3 months chart
 
3 months volume chart
 
 
Mining Company News
Plymouth Minerals LTDPLH.AX
Plymouth Minerals Intersects Further High Grade Potash in Drilling at Banio Potash Project - Plannin
AU$ 0.12-8.00%Trend Power :
Santos(Ngas-Oil)STO.AX
announces expected non-cash impairment
AU$ 7.66-0.78%Trend Power :
Oceana Gold(Au)OGC.AX
RELEASES NEW TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE HAILE GOLD MINE
AU$ 2.20+0.00%Trend Power :
Western Areas NL(Au-Ni-Pl)WSA.AX
Advance Notice - Full Year Results Conference Call
AU$ 3.86+0.00%Trend Power :
Canadian Zinc(Ag-Au-Cu)CZN.TO
Reports Financial Results for Q2 and Provides Project Updates
CA$ 0.12+4.55%Trend Power :
Stornoway Diamond(Gems-Au-Ur)SWY.TO
Second Quarter Results
CA$ 0.02+100.00%Trend Power :
McEwen Mining(Cu-Le-Zn)MUX
TO ACQUIRE BLACK FOX FROM PRIMERO=C2=A0
US$ 12.22-0.33%Trend Power :
Rentech(Coal-Ngas)RTK
Rentech Announces Results for Second Quarter 2017
US$ 0.20-12.28%Trend Power :
KEFIKEFI.L
Reduced Funding Requirement
GBX 0.52-0.76%Trend Power :
Lupaka Gold Corp.LPK.V
Lupaka Gold Receives First Tranche Under Amended Invicta Financing Agreement
CA$ 0.06+0.00%Trend Power :
Imperial(Ag-Au-Cu)III.TO
Closes Bridge Loan Financing
CA$ 2.64+0.00%Trend Power :
Guyana Goldfields(Cu-Zn-Pa)GUY.TO
Reports Second Quarter 2017 Results and Maintains Production Guidance
CA$ 1.84+0.00%Trend Power :
Lundin Mining(Ag-Au-Cu)LUN.TO
d Share Capital and Voting Rights for Lundin Mining
CA$ 16.48+1.54%Trend Power :
Canarc Res.(Au)CCM.TO
Canarc Reports High Grade Gold in Surface Rock Samples at Fondaway Canyon, Nevada
CA$ 0.26+4.08%Trend Power :
Havilah(Cu-Le-Zn)HAV.AX
Q A April 2017 Quarterly Report
AU$ 0.23+9.52%Trend Power :
Uranium Res.(Ur)URRE
Commences Lithium Exploration Drilling at the Columbus Basin Project
US$ 6.80-2.86%Trend Power :
Platinum Group Metals(Au-Cu-Gems)PTM.TO
Platinum Group Metals Ltd. Operational and Strategic Process ...
CA$ 1.90+1.06%Trend Power :
Devon Energy(Ngas-Oil)DVN
Announces $340 Million of Non-Core Asset Sales
US$ 53.08+0.70%Trend Power :
Precision Drilling(Oil)PD-UN.TO
Announces 2017Second Quarter Financial Results
CA$ 8.66-0.35%Trend Power :
Terramin(Ag-Au-Cu)TZN.AX
2nd Quarter Report
AU$ 0.04+5.56%Trend Power :