09-26
Fronteer Development Group Inc. (FRG - TSX/AMEX) today disclosed financial
and operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. Details
are described in the unaudited consolidated financial statements and
Management's Discussion and Analysis for the same periods, available on
SEDAR at http://www.sedar.com. Further details on each of Fronteer's
projects and activities can also be found on the Company's website: http://www.fronteergroup.com/. All amounts are presented in Canadian dollars
unless otherwise stated.
First half
2009 highlights
- Cash, cash
equivalents and short term deposits at June 30, 2009 totaled $159.1
million
- Increased
measured and indicated gold resources by 5%
- Increased
inferred gold resources by 16%
- Promising
drill results from two priority US gold projects
- Completed
a share-exchange acquisition of Aurora Energy Resources Inc.
Liquidity
At June 30, 2009, we had cash,
cash equivalents and short-term deposits on our balance sheet of $159.1
million and working capital of $158.0 million as compared to cash, cash
equivalents and short-term deposits of $81.0 million and working capital of
$78.4 million at December 31, 2008. The change in cash, cash equivalents
and short-term deposits and working capital of $78.1 million and $79.6
million, respectively, is primarily due to our acquisition of and
commencement of consolidation of Aurora and its financial results since
March 3, 2009, offset by cash exploration expenditures of $5.0 million (net
of $2.5 million in recoveries) and cash used in operations of $8.0 million.
Resource increase
During
the first half of 2009, our measured and indicated gold resources increased
5% to 3.7 million ounces, and our inferred gold resources increased 16% to
1.7 million ounces. The increases were entirely attributable to an initial
resource estimate for the Long Canyon project in Nevada, in which we have a
51% interest.
The initial Long Canyon resource estimate is summarized in the following
table. Michael Gustin, Ph D, P. Geo, Senior Geologist with Mine
Development Associates of Reno, Nevada, is the qualified person responsible
for the NI 43-101-compliant resource estimate. We disclosed details
of the estimate by news release dated March 13, 2009 and in a technical
report dated April 24, 2009, both of which are filed on SEDAR.
Summary
of initial resource estimate: Long Canyon(1)
|
Tonnes
|
g Au/tonne
|
oz Au/ ton
|
Contained gold (oz)
|
Indicated
|
4,808,000
|
2.35
|
0.069
|
363,000
|
Inferred
|
8,780,000
|
1.63
|
0.048
|
459,000
|
(1) The estimate is quoted at a cut-off grade of 0.30 grams per tonne
gold.
Outlook
Our three priority US gold
projects are Long Canyon, Sandman (100%-owned), and Northumberland
(100%-owned), all in Nevada. Through Aurora, we have the Michelin uranium
project (100% owned) in Labrador. We operate of all of these projects
except Sandman.
We expect
to disclose a preliminary economic assessment for Long Canyon by year end
2009 and an updated resource estimates in 2010 for Long Canyon and Sandman.
For Northumberland, we have tentative plans to complete a scoping study in
2011 that would provide initial estimates for project economics. For the
Michelin uranium project, before the end of 2009 we expect to disclose a
preliminary economic assessment with initial estimates for project
economics.
At
present, we have no revenue-producing operations. At the end of 2009,
absent an acquisition or other initiatives, we expect to have approximately
$141.4 million in cash, cash equivalents and short term deposits, compared
with $159.1 million as at June 30, 2009. For the second half of 2009, we
expect to spend approximately $17.7 million, absent new initiatives. This
includes planned exploration and related project spending by Fronteer of
approximately $15 million for all projects (net of contributions by joint
venture partners) and approximately $2.7 million on other expenses and
asset acquisitions, net of interest income.
Priority gold project review
At Long Canyon, our 51% share of project expenditures (which includes
non-cash expenses) totaled $2.4 million in the first half of 2009, mainly
for 7,000 metres
of exploration and infill drilling, and metallurgical testing. For the
second half of 2009, we expect our share of project cash expenditures will
total $8.5 million, including 30,000 metres of additional drilling and
the acquisition of additional surface and water rights. During the first
half we disclosed results from column leach testing of bulk samples from
Long Canyon road cuts. The results further confirmed that the
oxidized gold mineralization at Long Canyon is amenable to low-cost,
conventional, heap-leach processing. Exploration drilling encountered
an additional gold zone, called the Syncline Zone, while the infill
drilling intersected more wide intervals of high-grade mineralization in
the Discovery Zone where the established resource is located. The
metallurgical holes have been very encouraging and continue to demonstrate
the strong continuity and high-grade nature of gold mineralization.
At Sandman, project operator Newmont USA spent approximately US$3.1
million, completing 62 drill holes totaling 6,700 metres and
conducting preliminary metallurgical work. The budget for the second half
of 2009 is US$1.9 million and includes an additional 20 to 25 holes, or approximately
2,500 metres.
We disclosed during the second quarter the results from Newmont's first 37
drill holes in the 2009 program. Drilling encountered encouraging
mineralization and established good grades and continuity in two deposits,
approximately six kilometres apart. Newmont USA has the right to earn an
initial 51% interest in Sandman by June 2011 by spending a minimum US$14.0
million on exploration, making a production decision supported by a
bankable feasibility study, and other conditions. As at June 30, 2009,
Newmont USA has spent US$6.5 million on the property, or 46% of the
required amount to earn its initial interest.
At Northumberland, our first half of 2009 project expenses totaled $1.5
million and were focused on acquiring adjacent rights, preparing an
application to build a 280-metre decline, and other activities, including
environmental testing and metallurgical testing as part of a multi-phase
metallurgical program. The budget for the second half of 2009 is $2.6
million, mainly for permitting and engineering expenses related to the
decline, further metallurgical work, identifying preferred mine development
options, regional target generation and minor reclamation.
Acquisition of Aurora
On March 2, 2009, we acquired control of 92.1% of the issued and
outstanding shares of Aurora by issuing 30,134,229 common shares at a price
of $2.90. As a result of our significant shareholding in Aurora, we began
to consolidate 100% of the financial results of Aurora. In a second step
transaction, we acquired the remaining issued and outstanding shares of
Aurora on April 21, 2009
in return for a further 4,806,661 of our shares.
For May and June, the first two months that we owned 100% of Aurora, it
spent approximately $1.7 million on exploration and development on the
Michelin uranium project. For the second half of 2009, we expect that
Aurora will spend a further $1.2 million before allowing for the $1.5
million in performance bonds that will be refunded to us either in the
fourth quarter of 2009 or the first quarter of 2010. Aurora's pilot plant
leaching and resin-in-pulp extraction tests at the Michelin project
produced promising results, as disclosed during the second quarter of 2009.
The results strongly support the project's viability and production
potential, including a predicted yield averaging 87.5% uranium recovery
from the project's two mineralized deposits. Tailings test results meet
Canadian environmental standards.
Selected financial data
This summary of selected financial data should be read in
conjunction with the Management Discussion and Analysis
("MD&A") and the unaudited consolidated financial statements
and related notes thereto for the periods indicated.
|
(Unaudited) For the three
months ended
|
(Unaudited) For the six
months ended
|
In millions, except per share
|
June 30, 2009
|
June 30, 2008
|
June 30, 2009
|
June 30, 2008
|
Net income
(loss)
|
$1.5
|
($1.4)
|
($4.0)
|
($7.6)
|
Total comprehensive
income (loss)
|
$3.5
|
($1.4)
|
($2.0)
|
($12.4)
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per
share
|
$0.01
|
($0.02)
|
($0.04)
|
($0.09)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
(basic/diluted)
|
117.6
/ 122.3
|
83.2
/ 83.2
|
105.5
/ 105.5
|
83.2
/ 83.2
|
Cash invested in mineral properties
|
$5.3
|
$3.5
|
$7.6
|
$5.8
|
Cash generated by financing activities
|
$0.2
|
-
|
$0.1
|
$0.1
|
For the three
months ended June 30, 2009, we earned $1.5 million or $0.01 per share
compared with a loss of $1.4 million or $0.02 per share a year earlier. For
the six months ended June 30, 2009, we lost $4.0 million or $0.04 per
share, compared with a loss of $7.6 million or $0.09 per share a year
earlier.
We have no revenue producing operations. The
Company had net income of $1.5M for the three months ended June 30, 2009
due to a future income tax recovery of $1.5M (a non-cash item). Operating
expenditures incurred by the Company were offset by other income earned by
the Company, which consists of foreign exchange gains or losses, interest
income, equity income from equity investments and changes in fair value of
financial instruments. In prior periods, operating expenditures have
exceeded other income earned by the Company and any future income tax
recoveries.
About Fronteer
Fronteer is an exploration and development
company with three key gold projects in Nevada forming its platform for
future gold production. Fronteer also has a 40% interest in three
gold and copper-gold projects in western Turkey, and 100% ownership of
Aurora Energy Resources, a private subsidiary advancing a world-class
uranium district in Labrador, Canada. For further information on Fronteer
visit www.fronteergroup.com or contact:
Mark O'Dea, Ph.D, P.Geo President and CEO
Richard Moritz, Director, Investor Relations
Glen Edwards,
Director, Communications
Phone 604-632-4677 or Toll Free 1-877-632-4677
info@fronteergroup.com
Except for the statements of
historical fact contained herein, certain information presented constitutes
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United
States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such
forward-looking statements, including but not limited to, those with
respect to size of exploration budgets and timing of exploration programs,
potential sale of Turkish assets, timing of bond recovery, potential size
of mineralized zone, and size of exploration program involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual
results, performance or achievement of Fronteer
to be materially different from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such
factors include, among others, risks related to international operations
and joint ventures , the actual results of current exploration activities,
conclusions of economic evaluations, uncertainty in the estimation of ore
reserves and mineral resources, changes in project parameters as plans
continue to be refined, future prices of gold and silver, environmental
risks and hazards, increased infrastructure and/or operating costs, labor and employment matters, and government regulation
and permitting requirements as well as those factors discussed in the
section entitled "Risk Factors" in Fronteer's
Annual Information form and Fronteer's latest
Form 40-F on file with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
in Washington, D.C. Although Fronteer has
attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be
as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such
statements will prove to be accurate as actual results and future events
could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Fronteer
disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance
on forward-looking statements.
|