FD1410

FD1409

Lode 1

Lode 2

Lode 1

Lode 2

23 m @ 4.92 g/t including 5 m @ 20.32 g/t

5 m @ 2.76 g/t

2 m @ 17.31 g/t gold

20 m @ 2.00 g/t gold

FD1406

Lode 1

Lode 2

25 m @ 2.29 g/t gold including 17 m @ 3.13 g/t gold

22 m @ 2.75 g/t gold including 18 m @ 3.25 g/t gold

FD1405

Lode 1

Lode 11

8.75 m @ 4.38 g/t gold including 5 m @ 6.7 g/t gold

12 m @ 4.81 g/t gold including 7 m @ 6.70 g/t gold



FD1402

5 m @ 1.80 g/t gold



FD1405

8.75 m @ 4.38 g/t gold including 5 m @ 6.7 g/t gold



FD1406

25 m @ 2.29 g/t gold including 17 m @ 3.13 g/t gold



FD1407

11 m @ 1.72 g/t gold



FD1409

2 m @ 17.31 g/t gold



FD1410

23 m @ 4.92 g/t gold including 5 m @ 20.32 g/t gold



FD1402

7 m @ 1.42 g/t gold



FD1405

4 m @ 1.22 g/t gold



FD1406

22 m @ 2.75 g/t gold including 18 m @ 3.25 g/t gold



FD1407

9 m @ 1.58 g/t gold



FD1409

20 m @ 2.0 g/t gold



FD1410

5 m @ 2.76 g/t gold

Target

Hole

North

East

RL

Dip

Az

From

(m)

To

(m)

Width

(m)

Gold

(g/t)

Urucum

FD1402

99,867

402,096

196

-65

239

199

218

251

265

276

203

225

256

268

281

4

7

5

3

5

0.69

1.42

0.81

0.64

1.80

Urucum

FD1405

99,589

402,099

185

-79

262

283

296

334

392

399

413

Inc 413

508.53

Inc 518

287

298

338

395

409

421.75

418

527

525

4

2

4

3

10

8.75

5

18.47

7

0.77

0.55

1.22

2.38

1.19

4.38

6.70

3.47

6.70

Urucum

FD1406

99,491

402,051

176

-84

310

284

299

Inc 303

324

Inc 328

287

321

321

349

345

3

22

18

25

17

1.26

2.75

3.35

2.29

3.13

Urucum

FD1407

100,021

402,091

228

-61

251

218

244

262

270

333

221

246

271

274

344

3

2

9

4

11

1.98

1.58

0.53

1.72

0.65

Urucum

FD1409

100,188

402,108

236

-67

243

0

284

321

11.5

304

323

11.5

20

2

1.96

2.0

17.31

Urucum

FD1410

99,868

402,097

196

-68

227

244

257

303

Inc 321

249

264

326

326

5

7

23

5

2.76

0.55

4.92

20.32

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Sampling

techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (e.g.

cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.

For RC drilling the entire 1m RC samples were obtained and

split by an adjustable cone splitter attached to the base of the cyclone (1.5kg - 6.0kg) and were utilised for both lithology logging and assaying.

For diamond core, half core is measured, logged and then cut, crushed and pulverised at the Tucano site sample preparation laboratory.

Sampling

techniques

Include reference to measures

taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

Samples are split into single meter intervals.

Certified standards were inserted every 25th sample and to assess the accuracy and methodology of the external laboratories. Field duplicates were inserted every 20th sample to assess the repeatability and variability of the gold mineralisation. Laboratory duplicates were also completed approximately every 20th sample to assess the precision of the laboratory as well as the repeatability and variability of

the gold mineralisation. A blank standard was inserted at the

start of every batch. Results of the QAQC sampling were assessed on a batch by batch basis and were considered acceptable.

Aspects of the determination of

mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where

'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

1m RC samples were obtained by an adjustable cone splitter

attached to the base of the cyclone (1.5kg - 6.0kg) and were utilised for both lithology logging and assaying.

At the mine exploration sample preparation facility, core samples are dried at 105C, crushed to -8mm then to -2mm and split to 0.9-1kg before being pulverised to 1mm. This sample is quartered cut to between 200-400g before being pulverised to 95% passing 105μm. The final pulp is quartered again to achieve a sample of 100 - 200g and is sent to SGS laboratories in Belo Horizonte for fire assay.

At the mine exploration sample preparation facility, the RC

1m samples are dried at 140C, crushed to -2mm (if aggregated) and riffle split to 1kg. The 1 kg sample is then pulverised to 1mm and quarter cut to between 200 and 400g. This sample is then pulverised to 95% passing 105μm and quarter cut to a 100-200g sample to send to SGS. Any duplicates samples of the same interval are also sent to ACME laboratories for analysis. Samples from the Lookout Lode were assayed at the onsite chemical Laboratory.

Drilling

techniques

Drill type (e.g. core, reverse

circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.).

A 5.5'' diameter face sampling hammer was used for RC

drilling. For diamond drilling NQ size core is produced.

Drill sample

recovery

Method of recording and assessing

core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.

RC recovery was visually assessed, with recovery being

excellent except in some wet intervals at the water table. The majority of mineralised intersection results received occurred above the water table. All core is orientated and measured

for recovery

Drill sample

recovery

Measures taken to maximise

sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.

RC samples were visually checked for recovery, moisture

and contamination. The drilling contractor utilised a cyclone and cone splitter to provide uniform sample size. The cone splitter was cleaned at the end of every 3m rod and the cyclone cleaned at the completion of every hole.

Drill sample

recovery

Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and

grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to

preferential

Sample recoveries for RC holes were high within the mineralised zones. No significant bias is expected.

Logging

Whether core and chip samples

have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.

Lithology, alteration, veining, mineralisation and weathering

were logged from the RC chips and stored in Datashed. Chips from selected holes were also placed in chip trays and stored in a designated building at site for future reference.

Logging

Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or

costean, channel, etc.)

All logging is qualitative except for density and recovery. All core photography has been completed shortly after being

received at the core yard and always prior to cutting.

photography.

The total length and percentage of

the relevant intersections logged.

All drill holes are logged in full.

Sub-sampling

techniques and sample preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and

whether quarter, half or all core taken.

Core holes and half core sampled from cut core.

Sub-sampling

techniques and sample preparation

If non-core, whether riffled, tube

sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry.

The RC drilling utilised a cyclone and cone splitter to

produce samples in the 1kg to 6kg range. Once collected the sample is dried, crushed to -2mm and split at the site sample preparation lab down to approximately 1kg prior to pulverisation.

Sub-sampling

techniques and sample preparation

For all sample types, the nature,

quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.

The 1 kg sample is then pulverised to 1mm and quarter cut

to between 200 and 400g. This sample is then pulverised to

95% passing 105μm and quarter cut to a 100-200g sample to send to SGS or to the mine chemical lab for analysis.

Sub-sampling

techniques and sample preparation

Quality control procedures adopted

for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.

Certified standards and blanks were inserted every 25th

sample to assess the accuracy and methodology of the external laboratory (SGS), and field duplicates were inserted every 20th sample to assess the repeatability and variability of the gold mineralisation. At Tucano field duplicates were taken for diamond core but not for RC. Laboratory duplicates (sample preparation split) were completed every 20th

sample to assess the precision of the laboratory as well as the repeatability and variability of the gold mineralisation. Duplicate samples were also sent to a different lab (ACME Laboratories) for analysis.

Sub-sampling

techniques and sample preparation

Measures taken to ensure that the

sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.

The results of the field duplicates show an acceptable level

of repeatability.

Reconciliation data from mining at Tucano indicates that the sampling and estimation is representative.

Sub-sampling

techniques and sample preparation

Whether sample sizes are

appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.

Sample sizes (1kg to 6kg) are considered to be a sufficient

size to accurately represent the gold mineralisation based on the mineralisation style, the width and continuity of the intersections, the sampling methodology.

Field duplicates of diamond core have routinely been collected to ensure monitoring of the sub-sampling quality. Acceptable precision and accuracy is noted in the field duplicates albeit the precision is marginally acceptable and consistent with a course gold deposit.

Quality of

assay data and laboratory tests

The nature, quality and

appropriateness of the assaying

and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

All resource or exploration holes (prefix FD or F) gold

assaying completed by external certified laboratories (SGS in Belo Horizonte and ACME laboratories) and using a 30g charge for fire assay analysis with an AAS finish. This technique is industry standard for gold and considered appropriate. All grade control hole (prefix GCRC) gold assaying completed at the non-certified Tucano mine site chemical laboratory using similar fire assay analysis. Selected Screen fire analysis was performed on selected intervals where coarse gold was observed.

For geophysical tools,

spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations

factors applied and their derivation,

Geophysical tools not used.

etc.

Nature of quality control procedures

adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.

Certified Reference Material (CRM or standards) were

inserted every 25th sample to assess the assaying accuracy of the external laboratories. Field duplicates were inserted every 20th sample to assess the repeatability from the field and variability of the gold mineralisation. Laboratory duplicates were also completed approximately every 20th sample to assess the precision of assaying. Evaluation of both the Beadell submitted standards, and the internal laboratory quality control data, indicates assaying to be accurate and without significant drift for significant time periods. Excluding obvious errors, the vast majority of the CRM assaying report shows an overall mean bias of less than 5% with no consistent positive or negative bias noted. Duplicate assaying show high levels of correlation (linear correlation >0.96) and no apparent bias between the duplicate pairs. Field duplicate sample show marginally acceptable levels of correlation (0.89 for the SGS data set,

0.96 for the Ultratrace and MinAnalytical data set but 0.61 for the KalAssay data set) and no relative bias.

Each analysis batch (approx. 150 samples) is checked to ensure that the standards fall within the accepted levels of

standard deviation. Where any standard exceeds 3 standard

deviations or where more than one standard falls between 2 and 3 standard deviations, the entire batch is resubmitted for analysis.

Verification of

sampling and assaying

The verification of significant

intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.

The high grade intersections of core and RC have been

observed by various visiting geological consultants (e.g. Cube consulting).

Verification of

sampling and assaying

The use of twinned holes.

At Urucum underground diamond twin holes have been

drilled previously showing what is considered to be normal variations in Orogenic gold mineralisation.

Verification of

sampling and assaying

Documentation of primary data,

data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

All geological logging information is entered directly into

Logchief and synchronised with the Datashed database. Other field data (e.g. sampling sheets, downhole surveys etc.) are entered into excel spreadsheets formatted for Datashed importation. Lab assay reports are directly imported into Datashed along with all QAQC data and metadata. Data importation is done by Maxwell Geoservices staff under contract by Beadell Resources. All data loading procedures have been documented by Maxwell Geoservices.

Verification of

sampling and assaying

Discuss any adjustment to assay

data.

Data below the detection limit is defined with a negative

value, e.g.

Location of

data points

Accuracy and quality of surveys

used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used

in Mineral Resource estimation.

Beadell drill hole collar locations were picked up by site-

based authorized surveyors using Total Station Leica 407, calibrated to a base station (expected accuracy of 20mm).

Downhole surveying was measured by the drilling contractors using a Reflex Gyro Downhole Survey Instrument for RC holes. Shallow RC holes were picked up at the collar and 2 points on the rod string using Total Station. Grade control RC holes less than ~50m depth are not down hole surveyed.

Location of

data points

Specification of the grid system

used.

The grid system is SAD 69 Zone 22N.

Location of

data points

Quality and adequacy of

Beadell Brasil Ltda Survey Staff generated a digital terrain

topographic control.

model (DTM) from Total Station surface pickups of the

Tucano deposit.

Data spacing and

distribution

Data spacing for reporting of

Exploration Results.

The nominal drill hole spacing is 5m (E) by 10m (N) for the

Tucano RC holes and nominal 50m x 50m spacing for diamond drilling at Urucum Underground.

Data spacing and

distribution

Whether the data spacing and

distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

The data spacing and distribution is sufficient to demonstrate

spatial and grade continuity of the mineralised domains to support the definition of Inferred, Indicated and Measured Mineral resources under the 2012 JORC code.

Data spacing and

distribution

Whether sample compositing has

been applied.

No sample compositing has been applied in the field within

the mineralised zones.

Orientation of data in

relation to geological

structure

Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of

possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the

deposit type.

The majority of drilling is orientated east-west at Tucano with a 60 degree dip, which is roughly perpendicular to both the

strike and dip of the mineralisation; therefore ensuring intercepts are close to true-width.

Orientation of data in

relation to geological

structure

If the relationship between the

drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

Sectional interpretation of 5m spaced holes on 10m spaced

lines shows a very uniform mineralised zone both along strike and down dip. The drill orientation is as close to

normal to this body as possible and therefore the drill hole to mineralisation is not considered to have introduced a sampling bias.

Sample

security

The measures taken to ensure

sample security.

Samples are securely sealed and stored onsite, until delivery to Macapa via the company contracted Taxi driver, who then

also delivers the samples directly to TAM airlines cargo dispatch facility for delivery to Belo Horizonte. Sample submission forms are sent with the samples as well as emailed to the laboratory, and are used to keep track of the

sample batches.

Audits or

reviews

The results of any audits or reviews

of sampling techniques and data.

A site visits was completed in 2012 (Cube Consulting) to

review sampling procedures and grade control practices. This visit concluded the sampling to be at an industry standard, and of sufficient quality to carry out a Mineral Resource Estimation.

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Mineral

tenement and land tenure status

Type, reference name/number,

location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical

sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.

The Tucano deposits reside in tenement 851.676/1992,

centrally located within the northern state of Amapa, Brazil. The current registered holder of the tenements is Beadell Brasil Ltda.

The Duckhead prospect resides in tenement 852.730/1993, centrally located within the northern state of Amapa, Brazil. The current registered holders of the tenements is Anglo Ferrous, however Beadell Brasil Ltda has mineral rights to extract gold resources under a Joint Operators Agreement with the Anglo Ferrous. Beadell Brasil Ltda is already operating a nearby gold and iron ore producing mine site ("Tucano Gold") on its neighbouring mining lease.

The security of the tenure held at

the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

Existing mining concession owned 100% by Beadell

Resources Ltd. Existing mining lease, owned by Anglo Ferrous at Duckhead. Beadell owns 100% of the gold rights and Duckhead Mining Agreements governs the access.

Exploration

done by other parties

Acknowledgment and appraisal of

exploration by other parties.

Beadell Brasil Ltda acknowledges the previous operator

MPBA for the initial discovery of the deposit.

Geology

Deposit type, geological setting

and style of mineralisation.

The Tucano deposits are structurally controlled orogenic

lode type gold deposit hosted within a Banded Iron Formation unit in contact with a Clastic quartz biotite schist. The Lodes are characterised by shear parallel disseminated pyrite and pyrrhotite mineral assemblages and generally exhibit a strong oxidation profile in the regolith without any secondary dispersion other than colluvial deposits.

The Duckhead deposits are structurally controlled orogenic lode type gold deposit hosted within a Banded Iron Formation unit in contact with a Clastic quartz biotite schist.

The Wing Lode and Hangingwall Lodes are characterised by shear parallel disseminated pyrite and pyrrhotite mineral assemblages. The Main Lode is characterised by extremely deep weathering on the BIF and clastic contact.

Drill hole

Information

A summary of all information

material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:

o easting and northing of the drill hole collar

o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill

hole collar

o dip and azimuth of the hole

o down hole length and

interception depth

o hole length.

See Table 1

Drill hole

Information

If the exclusion of this information

is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from

the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the

case.

Data

aggregation methods

In reporting Exploration Results,

weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.

In the reporting of exploration results, un-cut grades are

reported. The lower cut-off limit is considered to be 0.5g/t for the reporting of drill hole intercepts with no more than 2 m downhole internal dilution. Intercepts are determined using a weighted average over the length of the intercept.

Where aggregate intercepts

incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.

In the instance where aggregate intercepts include shorter

lengths of higher grade material, the total interval is stated first followed by the word "including", then a listing of the contained shorter high grade intercepts.

The assumptions used for any

reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.

No metal equivalents are used at Tucano.

Relationship

between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths

These relationships are particularly

important in the reporting of

Exploration Results.

The drilling was designed to intersect the mineralisation at

an angle that is roughly perpendicular to the overall trend for both strike and dip. The mineralised intervals are generally much wider than the minimum sample interval of 1m.

Relationship

between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths

If the geometry of the

mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.

The drilling was designed to intersect the mineralisation at

an angle that is roughly perpendicular to the overall trend for both strike and dip. The mineralised intervals are generally much wider than the minimum sample interval of 1m.

Relationship

between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths

If it is not known and only the

down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. 'down hole length, true width not known').

All drill intersections are stated as down hole lengths. At

Duckhead drill intercepts approximate true widths.

At Urucum true widths are approximately half the down hole width

Diagrams

Appropriate maps and sections

(with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.

See diagrams in main body of the announcement.

Balanced

reporting

Where comprehensive reporting of

all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.

All the significant results greater than 0.5 g/t gold over at

least 2m downhole have been reported in Table 1 and Table

2.

Other

substantive exploration data

Other exploration data, if

meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.

The Tucano results are from an active mining area where

open pit mining is in progress. Reconciliation has been verified by mill metallurgical balance based on models using the same drilling method for results.