The truth, in regards to the world’s mineral resources, is that we in the
western developed countries are usually not in control of supply.
“The spectre of resource insecurity has come back with a
vengeance. The world is undergoing a period of intensified resource
stress, driven in part by the scale and speed of demand growth from emerging
economies and a decade of tight commodity markets. Poorly designed and
short-sighted policies are also making things worse, not better. Whether
or not resources are actually running out, the outlook is one of supply
disruptions, volatile prices, accelerated environmental degradation and
rising political tensions over resource access.” Chatham House,
Resources Futures
There are many serious concerns in regards to global resource extraction
that we need to consider:
- Resource nationalism/Country risk, political instability
of supplier
- A looming skills shortage
- Competition with Chinese mining investment, smaller
areas open for exploration
- Low hanging fruit - the high quality large deposits have
already been found, lower economic attractiveness of new projects, cost
inflation
- Supply bottlenecks for much needed and scarce equipment
- The manipulation of supplies ie speculation and concentrated
ownership of LME stocks
- Rising capex/opex, lack of financing options, capital
project execution
- Lack of innovation and technological advancements
- Declining open pit production, ongoing operational
issues
- Lack of recognition for population growth, growing
middle class w/disposable incomes and urbanization as on-going demand
growth factors
- Environmental group and labor risks, mining unrest -
lack of a social license to operate, incredibly difficult and lengthy
permitting processes
- Climate change, accidents and natural disasters
- Lack of infrastructure or poor infrastructure access,
attacks on supply infrastructure
- Price and currency volatility
- Fraud and corruption
Access to raw materials at competitive prices has become essential to the
functioning of all industrialized economies.

PricewaterhouseCoopers, Resource Scarcity
Accessing a sustainable, and secure, supply of raw materials is going to
become the number one priority for all countries. Increasingly we are going
to see countries ensuring their own industries have first rights of access to
internally produced commodities and they will look for such privileged access
from other countries.
Numerous countries are taking steps to safeguard their own supply by:
- Stopping or slowing the export of natural resources
- Shutting down traditional supply markets
- Buying companies for their deposits
- Project finance tied to off take agreements
“Continued growth in consumption resources is being driven by growth
in China and the rest of Asia. Chinese companies are increasingly acquiring
assets, as are Indian companies, prompting other global miners into a race to
secure mineral assets of their own.” George Fang, Standard Bank’s Head
of Mining and Metals China
The new competitor’s for the world’s resources have a mandate to secure
long term resource deals for domestic use and have the financing capabilities
any major mining company, or for that matter any government, would be envious
of.
China’s state owned enterprises (SOE) and sovereign wealth funds (SWF)
were armed with hundreds of billions of US dollars from the country’s foreign
reserves and sent out to scour the globe for resources - they went on the
hunt to fuel China’s exploding economy. China wants to diversify out of the
massive US dollar component of its Foreign Reserves so the SOE/SWFs have no
problem dealing in straight cash and operating in what some might consider
high risk areas. The Chinese also have a longer term horizon for their
ultimate payoff because they are mostly after off-take supply agreements from
early stage development projects.
China, along with Japan (imports 100% of its fossil fuels) and Korea, who
have no lithium of their own, have been forming strategic alliances, joint
ventures, and acquisitions with lithium exploration companies worldwide.
“Lithium supply security has become a top priority for Asian
technology and manufacturing companies. Strategic alliances, joint ventures,
joint ventures and acquisitions, continue to be established with lithium
exploration companies worldwide. These agreements ensure a reliable and
diversified supply of lithium for Asia's battery suppliers and vehicle
manufacturers.
With lithium carbonate being one of the lowest cost components of a
lithium-ion battery, the issue that Asian companies are addressing supply
security attained which can be achieved by acquiring lithium from various
lithium producers. These measures have been ongoing since 2009 which has seen
Asian companies establish joint venture and acquire existing producers.
These strategic moves have allowed battery and vehicle companies to
alleviate the possibility of future lithium supply disruptions, which could
have devastating consequences in a well-established and productive HEV, PHEV,
and EV industry. Consider that both Korea and Japan, who are amongst the
largest producers of lithium ion batteries have no lithium hard rock or salar
brine deposits within their borders.” Livio Filice, Seeking Alpha
The rechargeable power needs of our modern society has made lithium a
serious player in the commodity markets.
The reason for the electrification of the global transportation system is
clear.
Electric vehicles (EVs) have far fewer moving parts than Internal
Combustion Engine (ICE) gasoline-powered cars - they don't have mufflers, gas
tanks, catalytic converters or ignition systems, there’s also never an oil
change or tune-up to worry about getting done. Plug and go, pretty convenient
and very green!
But the clean and green doesn’t end there - electric drives are more
efficient then the drives on ICE powered cars. They are able to convert more
of the available energy to propel the car therefore using less energy to go
the same distance. And applying the brakes converts what was simply wasted
energy in the form of heat to useful energy in the form of electricity to
help recharge the car’s batteries.
The first DVD players, the first flat panel widescreen TV’s, the first
production runs of any advanced technology are always more expensive than
later unit costs will be. That is a fact, but this author believes that
Hybrid and fully Electric Vehicle prices will soon be very affordable and
offer cost advantages over their polluting gas guzzling ICE second cousins.
Electric vehicles are totally emission free. China, the world’s
second-biggest economy, in a move to cap its carbon emissions by 2030 and
curb worsening air pollution said it was preparing to set a deadlinefor
automakers to end sales of fossil-fuel-powered vehicles.
That’s a lot of lithium batteries to manufacture – and the Chinese are
preparing by locking up a secure supply of lithium. In just a few short
years, by 2021, Chinese Gigafactory’s will provide 3.5 times more gigawatt-hours
of battery cells than Tesla’s current Gigafactory.
Lithium supply or off-take agreements have been signed with lithium
focused companies from Australia, Mexico and Argentina to name just a few
countries - Jiangxi Ganfeng Lithium Co., a Chinese company, even has an
off-take deal with a company operating in Ireland.
Here are a few examples of Chinese, Korean and Japanese lithium off-take
deals:
https://marketintelligence.spglobal.com/docum...ly-Aug-2017.pdf
https://marketintelligence.spglobal.com/ou...-off-take-deals
target="_blank" http://www.marketwired.com/press-releas...-li-1271173.htm target="_blank"
https://www.businessnews.com.au/arti...hi-offtake-deal< target="_blank"/p>
http://www.proactiveinvestors.co....ent-174615.html target="_blank"a>
https://www.ft.com/content/724...ac-6d03d067f81 target="_blank"f
https://www.bnamericas.com/...-lithium-sector

Lithium production in 2016 was 89% concentrated in three countries:
Australia 40%, Chile 33% (added a new royalty regime in 2017 considerably
adding to production costs) and current economic basket case Argentina 16%,
which together comprised 89% of global supply.
There is no doubt that the three leading countries in lithium-ion battery
production for electric vehicles are looking to, or are already close to
locking up most of the global supply of lithium for their own use.
Lithium project developers in North America should be on every investors
radar screen - the supply of lithium for North American gigafactory’s, is
going to tighten.
And no wonder Asia is locking up global lithium supply!
China and India are both going to 100% electric vehicles. Every major car
manufacturer has electric models. Volvo has even promised to phase out
traditional internal combustion engines (ICE) from 2019.
France has promised to end the sale of gasoline and diesel vehicles by
2040, the U.K. quickly followed suit.
Bloomberg New Energy Financepredicts electric vehicles will make up an
astounding 54% of new car sales by 2040.

In 2016, Chinese carmakers sold 28.03 million cars. If China follows
through on its promise to go 100% electric that’s a minimum 28.03 million
lithium-ion battery packs.
Add in the UK’s2.7 million car sales in 2016and France’s2 million car
sales in 2016.
That’s 32.73 million electric vehicles all requiring lithium-ion battery
packs, without counting electric buses (a big deal in China, and going to be
in India as well) or annual growth rates in auto sales.
One Tesla car battery uses 45 kg or 100lbs of lithium carbonate.
Tesla intends to ramp up its vehicle production to 500,000 cars per year
by 2018 and 1,000,000 cars by 2020. A million electric cars produced in North
America means 45,454,000kg/100,000,000 pounds or 45,454mt/50,000t of lithium
carbonate equivalent (LCE) has to be mined just for Tesla’s North American
electric vehicle production – and Tesla has promised to source North American
Lithium. Elon Musk, Tesla’s CEO also has plans to build four more
Gigafactory’s.
Think about those global 32,730,000 lithium battery packs.
If each used the same amount of lithiumcarbonate as Tesla’s electric
vehicles that’s 1.487Bkg/3.273 Billion pounds or 1,487,727mt/1,636,500t
of new lithium carbonate demand.
Current annual production of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE), for all
purposes, stands at 182,000 metric tonnes, there is a very slight excess
in 2017 predicted to disappear in early 2018.
The global lithium market is
measured in terms of ‘lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE), given that lithium
carbonate is the most commonly traded product in the market.
Consider India is going 100% electric and piling on to the existing
lithium demand, surely there will be other countries, and companies like
Volvo, announcing the phase out of internal combustion engines?
The
Massive Impact of EVs on Commodities
“When you look at all the battery plants being built and the plans for
EVs, even if only about 25 percent of those are realized, we’re still going
to be short of lithium. It’s a unique once-in-a-generation situation.”
Simon Moores, managing director of Benchmark Mineral, Electric Car Boom
Drives Rush to Mining's $90 Billion Hub
Lithium security of supply key
If we want a lithium-ion battery industry and electric vehicles built in
North America we need lithium security of supply. No longer can we rely on
the good graces of other countries, we need to develop an energy metals
industry in North America – from mine to battery.
Lithium stocks, the producers and the near term producers are expensive,
there are few bargains to be found among the more developed plays.
Fortunately, for investors and our planet’s health, the move towards
electrifying the global transportation system is fully underway and appears
unstoppable.
And that means, in this author’s opinion, the earlier stage lithium
focused resource plays are going to receive major investor attention.
But not just any early stage lithium company is worthy of our attention.
Brine vs hardrock lithium mining
Although it’s less expensive than hard rock (Granite pegmatite-ore bodies
are the hard-rock source of lithium. The lithium minerals that occur in
granite pegmatites are spodumene, apatite, lepidolite, tourmaline and
amblygonite) lithium mining, salar based lithium sources have a self imposed
limit to annual production. You can realistically pump out only as fast as
new water comes in and replenishes it. Also, with the brines your grade
slowly depletes.
Of course a company should have 100% control over the production rate from
their salar. It’s possible an aquifer can become diluted - over producing can
impact the brine’s salt concentrations and chemical compositions - or
depleted by too many wells sucking up more brine than should be produced.
If two or more companies have straws (wells) into the same salar legal
battles might result over the sharing of the resources.
That’s not a sustainable business model and lawsuits are liable to erupt.
Many junior exploration companies chasing lithium projects are not
cognizant of the economic and technical challenges – no brine mining projects
and even fewer hard rock projects have been put into production for the last
two decades and when done so it’s been by the major lithium producers – this
exposes something in the industry no one talks about – a lack of skilled
personnel to get involved with minerology/metallurgy and the engineering side
of production.
Hard rock lithium miners have large problems facing them when competing
with brine economics – firstly most have large capital (capex) costs for
start up and secondly their production cost is roughly twice what it is for
the brine exploitation process.
Lithium products derived from brine operations can be used directly in
end-markets, but hard-rock lithium concentrates need to be further refined
before they can be used in value-added applications like lithium-ion
batteries.
Pegmatites are on the small side when it comes to size. A 2012 University
of Michigan study, for example found that even the largest pegmatites have
estimated resources similar only to that of the average brine, and, on
average, brines are an order of magnitude larger in contained lithium than
hard rock pegmatites.
Clayton Valley
The decision by electric car innovator, Tesla, to locate a battery
manufacturing plant in the state has triggered a rush of claims in Clayton
Valley.
Albermarle’s Silver Peak lithium mine in Clayton Valley, Nevada is the
only producing (50 years) lithium brine operation in the United States.
Because Clayton Valley is an endorheic basin - endorheic basins are closed
drainage basins that retain water and allow no outflow - precipitation and
inflow water from the surrounding mountains only leaves the system by evaporation
and seepage.
Albermarle production started at upwards of 600 milligrams per liter of
lithium in the brine and even though Clayton is a closed basin now they’re
mining just over 100 milligrams Li per liter.
Other basins in Nevada are considered open - water travels in and out
reducing lithium concentrations. The possibility of finding an economic
lithium deposit to compete with Clayton Valley’s is much more difficult.
The best of both lithium and hard rock?
Cypress Development Corp.
This is a heads up to alert my readers to what is a potentially explosive
drill program scheduled to start very soon.
One North American lithium focused company I’m extremely high on is
Cypress Development Corp. (TSX-V: CYP, OTCBB: CYDVF,
Frankfurt: C1Z1).
Cypress is in the unique position of working to establish a resource and
economic metallurgical process for what Cypress believes is a large,
bulk-tonnage deposit of leachable, non-hectorite ‘claystone.’ If, as
indicated by early results, the claystone is proven to be a significant
lithium source rock, then Cypress will be in a very enviable position of
having the best of both worlds - a combination of mining an at-surface
leachable deposit, the claystone, that’s capable of producing a ‘synthetic
lithium brine.’
With a Clayton Valley, Nevada address, money in the treasury, an unusual
lithium source, impressive first phase results regarding assay values and
deposit size,, low public share float, an immediate drill program and Bill
Willoughby (Dr. Willoughby has been a Professional Engineer since 1985 and
received his Doctorate in Mining Engineering & Metallurgy from the
University of Idaho in 1989) as the CEO this might be, in my opinion, the
best early stage lithium play out there.
I’m sure I’ll be writing much more in the near future regarding Cypress
and it’s intriguing Clayton Valley project.
Conclusion
Your author knows the lithium space. I was one of the very first, back in
2009 to be writing about then President Obama’s plans for electrification of
America’s transportation system. I was exposing my readers to the Puna
Plateau (Lithium Triangle), a brine mining business model, The Lithiu target="_blank"m Three
and the Lithium
ABC’s long before most others were even aware of the once in a generation
change starting to take place.
Tesla Motors Inc. is on record saying it plans to only use raw materials
sourced from North American for its $5-billion lithium-ion battery
gigafactory.
New York Governor Andrew M. Cuomo recently stated that Imperium3 New York
Inc. will build the state's first gigafactory producing lithium-ion
batteries, aiming to produce three gigawatts of batteries by Q4 2019 and
eventually to 15 gigawatts.
A Lithium Supercycle, North America’s lack of supply of said commodity, a
large enough resource to prevent fragmented supply chains and supply North
America for decades, upcoming drill programs, assays, metallurgical work
results and Cypress Development Corp. (TSX-V: CYP, OTCBB: CYDVF,
Frankfurt: C1Z1) are all on my radar screen. Are they on yours?
If not, maybe they should be.
aheadoftheherd.com
Sign up for Ahead Of The Herd’s target="_blank" free highly acclaimed newsletter.
***
Legal Notice / Disclaimer
This document is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or
the solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe for any investment.
Richard owns shares of Cypress Development Corp. (TSX-V: CYP,
OTCBB: CYDVF, Frankfurt: C1Z1) and CYP is an advertiser on his
site.
|