Fermer X Les cookies sont necessaires au bon fonctionnement de 24hGold.com. En poursuivant votre navigation sur notre site, vous acceptez leur utilisation.
Pour en savoir plus sur les cookies...
AnglaisFrancais
Cours Or & Argent en

Doug Casey's omniscience vs. the many records of gold price suppression

IMG Auteur
Publié le 12 février 2015
636 mots - Temps de lecture : 1 - 2 minutes
( 4 votes, 4/5 ) , 3 commentaires
Imprimer l'article
  Article Commentaires Commenter Notation Tous les Articles  
0
envoyer
3
commenter
Notre Newsletter...
Rubrique : Or fractionnaire

Doug Casey, founder of Casey Research, may be admired for his omniscience anyway. In an interview today with Dan Steinhart of The Casey Report --

http://www.caseyresearch.com/cdd/doug-casey-o...-and-what-to...

-- Casey declares, "The government doesn't care about gold. ... They don't care about its price, and even less about that of silver."

Casey adds: "I don't believe in the conspiracy theories regarding gold price suppression. There's zero credible evidence for it, and I'm embarrassed having to discuss the subject with outsiders who have heard it. For them it's more evidence that gold investors all wear tin-foil hats."


But unfortunately once again Casey failed explain how he knows what governments are thinking about gold -- did he question even one government official about it? -- and failed to address any particular piece of evidence of government involvement in the gold market. This may leave those of his firm's clients who are not also omniscient wondering about the contradiction between Casey's assurances and the long, vast, and contemporaneous public record of both open and surreptitous government intervention in the gold market.

For example:

-- If government doesn't care about the price of gold, why did the Banque de France's director of market operations, Alexandre Gautier, tell the London Bullion Market Association in September 2013 that the French central bank trades gold for its own account and the accounts of other central banks "nearly on a daily basis"?:

http://www.gata.org/node/13373

Are those central banks trading gold just for fun? Or was Gautier lying?

Was Gautier lying again when he told the LBMA in November last year that central banks now are "managing" their gold reserves "more actively"?:

http://gata.org/node/14716

And if central banks don't care about gold, why does Gautier refuse to discuss their gold trading as if it is terribly sensitive?:

http://gata.org/node/14954

-- Why does the European Central Bank secretly gather representatives of its member central banks every few years before emerging to proclaim that "gold remains an important element of global monetary reserves" and that its member central banks "will continue to coordinate their gold transactions so as to avoid market disturbances"? What is that secret "coordination" if not conspiracy?:

http://www.gata.org/node/14014

-- Why, in June 2005, did William R. White, the director of the monetary and economic department of the Bank for International Settlements, the central bank of the central banks, tell a BIS conference in Basel, Switzerland, that a primary purpose of international central bank cooperation is "the provision of international credits and joint efforts to influence asset prices -- especially gold and foreign exchange -- in circumstances where this might be thought useful"?:

http://www.gata.org/node/4279

Was White lying?

-- If governments don't care about gold, why does the BIS actually advertise to potential central bank members that its services include secret interventions in the gold market?:

http://www.gata.org/node/11012

-- Indeed, if governments don't care about gold, why does the BIS acknowledge that it functions largely as the broker for secret central bank transactions in gold? Are those transactions just for fun as well?:

http://www.gata.org/node/12717

-- If governments don't care about gold, why did the staff of the International Monetary Fund report secretly to its board in March 1999 that central banks refuse to disclose their gold swaps and leases because disclosure would impair their secret interventions in the currency markets?:

http://www.gata.org/node/12016

-- Why did Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan testify to Congress in 1998 that central banks lease gold to suppress its price?:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/te...98/19980724.htm

Many similar questions could be put to Casey:

target="_blank"

http://www.gata.org/node/14839

Like Casey, GATA doesn't believe in "conspiracy theories" either. Casey is the only one talking about "theories" here. When documents and public admissions show governments and central banks meeting secretly to develop and implement a course of action toward gold, we believe in conspiracy fact, while the clients of Casey Research are left with nothing but Casey's omniscience.

 

Données et statistiques pour les pays mentionnés : France | Tous
Cours de l'or et de l'argent pour les pays mentionnés : France | Tous
<< Article précedent
Evaluer : Note moyenne :4 (4 votes)
>> Article suivant
Publication de commentaires terminée
  Tous Favoris Mieux Notés  
Doug Casey is either a buffoon or just a downright idiot or both.How long has he been a citizen of the united states???
In case Doug has just woken from a deep sleep ,he would have noticed that he is living or lived in a country notorious
for its filthy lying.Now he asks certain questions of GATA as to why they can't get cracking and prove their case against
the american administration??

Well quite simply put Doug Casey and others ,its for the exact same reasons that neither the slain Lee Harvey Oswald
could ever be brought to trial, the same that there are more than 100 innocent prisoners on Guantanamo that the slime
in the american administration won't put them in the witness box and the same goes for the 3500 Architects,engineers,scientists etc
that are not allowed to present their findings regarding the 9/11 abomination in which the american authorities legalised the killing
of their own citizens by imploding the twin towers and pulling building K7.

It just goes on and on and on ,the lies, deciet etc are overwhelming so Doug Casy and others I don't want to read any further rubbish onthis subject
Chris Powel and his men are doing a great job under the most trying conditions imaginable notwithstanding all the obstacles the american fed and others are putting in their way.

CAPICE dirty doug
Evaluer :   2  1Note :   1
EmailPermalink
Doug Casey found guilty of incompetence by innuendo concerning the world-wide conspiracy to manipulate gold prices.
No hard evidence required, just admissions that banks regularly buy and sell in the gold market.

If GATA had hard evidence, why have they had such massive failures in the courts?
If GATA had proof, why are only the conspiracy theorists aligned with GATA?
If GATA could sway a court, wouldn't GATA be entitled to compensatory damages and court costs for the myriad of cases brought?

The problem with belief systems is the iron-clad rule that any evidence contrary to the belief MUST be denied, refuted, ridiculed and the offender duly chastised in the public forum.
Oh, and belief systems require no proofs. It is solely a matter of faith.

For the the scope of the conspiracy represented by GATA to exist, the number of participants must number at least in the 1000's and more probably in the 10's of 1000's. Each must maintain a level of secrecy equivalent to the Manhattan Project.

Occam's Razor is calling this conspiracy a matter of odorous bovine excrement. But, ...
the same level of analysis would support the notion that all parties involved in the gold market are looking after self-interests.
Every sale requires a buyer and seller.
Is GATA suggesting each participant takes a turn losing money to keep the selling price down?
What if one participant decides they will only engage in the market when they think they can turn a profit?
Would GATA suggest there is some hidden penalty for failing to lose money in order to suppress the price?

I, for one, don't believe in the goodness of GATA to root out any possible coordinated manipulations in the gold market.
Nobody spends that kind of money out of philanthropy.
First, last and always, remember "cui bono". Who benefits?
Logic would tend to support the notion that someone or someones bank-rolling GATA has a substantial holding they desire to sell at a substantial profit.
Marked increases in the price of gold adversely affect those who are buy and hold customers.
So the questions are, "Who is GATA working for? Who is bank-rolling GATA?"

Just a house flippers adversely affect those wanting to buy a home to live in, so does the efforts of GATA adversely affect those who desire to protect their meager wealth through the purchase of PMs.

Doug Casey can take care of himself.
Can GATA?
Or is the only avenue left for GATA to pursue is character assassination by innuendo?

When only a fraction of a percent of people have ever seen any gold that wasn't fabricated into jewelry, the public couldn't care less about the price of gold.
Think about it. Americans buy an awful lot of jewelry that is gold-plated or gold-filled.
The reason? Its cheap and still has the look. It is ALL about appearances but never substance.
Do the Chinese, Indians , Arabs, etc scurry down to the nearest discount jeweler to by gold-plated crap?

Yah, someone is holding. Probably paper gold. Looking for that once in a life-time killing.
I'm thinking GATA is just the front.
BTW, just what product does GATA bring to market? Perhaps a heaping basket of innuendo?
Evaluer :   3  1Note :   2
EmailPermalink
I certainly concede Casey's omniscience is odd, but not proof that he's "in on it".

That said, large conspiracies have been successfully enacted for years, so I can't rule out a conspiracy just because it would take a few thousand people (cf Gulf of Tonkin), especially when banks acknowledge they do manipulate, at least to some extent.

But, please, can you provide a plausible explanation why gold purchasing can have record-setting year after year after year, and "We Buy Gold" places can pop up everywhere (and they don't sell gold), and central banks can increase holdings pretty everywhere (but the US), production can decline...and yet the price just keeps dropping.

If you can give no explanation for this, can you provide a historical precedent for any commodity that's behaved similarly? An obscure economic school of thought that says as supply decreases and demand increases, price should drop? Anything to compare to the above very simple theory that "someone is lying"?
Dernier commentaire publié pour cet article
I certainly concede Casey's omniscience is odd, but not proof that he's "in on it". That said, large conspiracies have been successfully enacted for years, so I can't rule out a conspiracy just because it would take a few thousand people (cf Gulf of Ton  Lire la suite
Doom - 16/02/2015 à 00:27 GMT
Top articles
Flux d'Actualités
TOUS
OR
ARGENT
PGM & DIAMANTS
PÉTROLE & GAZ
AUTRES MÉTAUX