Fermer X Les cookies sont necessaires au bon fonctionnement de 24hGold.com. En poursuivant votre navigation sur notre site, vous acceptez leur utilisation.
Pour en savoir plus sur les cookies...
AnglaisFrancais
Cours Or & Argent en

Radical Stupidity: Academics Endorse $20,000 Income for Everyone, Working or Not

IMG Auteur
Publié le 01 juillet 2014
531 mots - Temps de lecture : 1 - 2 minutes
( 2 votes, 5/5 ) , 2 commentaires
Imprimer l'article
  Article Commentaires Commenter Notation Tous les Articles  
0
envoyer
2
commenter
Notre Newsletter...
SUIVRE : Canada

If you made less than $20,000 annually, but were guaranteed $20,000 whether you worked at all, would you work?

Most wouldn't. And it should be obvious why: People like free time and they would gladly take more of it if they got paid for doing nothing (about $9.61 per hour).

Academic Wonderland

Academics in wonderland need some remedial education because they have not figured out what should be blatantly obvious.

Please consider Guaranteed $20K income for all Canadians endorsed by academics.

A group of academics and activists is trying to drum up interest in an ambitious plan to provide every Canadian with a guaranteed minimum level of income — whether or not they have a job.

Rob Rainer, a campaign director for the Basic Income Canada Network, envisions a country where everyone is assured a minimum of $20,000 annually to make ends meet.

"For many of us, we think the goal is no one should be living in poverty," Rainer said at a conference on the issue over the weekend at McGill University.

"That's essentially what we're striving to achieve."

More than 100 speakers and participants were on hand for the conference, which focused on the merits of a guaranteed minimum income that would either replace or exist alongside existing social programs.

The idea is hardly new — the Canadian and Manitoba government conducted an experiment with the issue in the 1970s — but it has enjoyed a resurgence lately.

Switzerland is expected to hold a non-binding referendum this fall on whether to guarantee every citizen an annual income of $35,900 Cdn.

And in the United Sates, the idea has supporters on both sides of the political spectrum.

"The idea is not new, it's not really radical," Rainer said, pointing out that seniors and families with children receive a form of guaranteed income from the government.

"Where it does become more radical is when you get into the area of the working age population, and the idea that people should receive some income whether they are in the labour market or not. That's a fairly radical idea in our culture, because most of us were brought up to believe that in order to survive you have to work."
Radical Stupidity

None of these geniuses have bothered to work out the tax implication math and the consequences of huge numbers of people would prefer to watch TV, play games, or go fishing rather than work if the economic payback was the same.

Actually, because of transportation and meal costs, people working a $9.61 per hour job would be far worse off than those getting $9.61 for those sitting at home watching TV.

How many illegal aliens would such a scheme attract?

And why would it stop at $20,000?

It wouldn't and couldn't. Companies would have to hike the minimum wage to $30,000 or $40,000 to attract any workers. Prices would go up accordingly, and the inflation aspects of a guaranteed "living income" would immediately make $20,000 too little to live on.

Someone with a 7th grade education should be able to figure this out. But academics in wonderland, with no common sense, and no real world experience can't.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Données et statistiques pour les pays mentionnés : Canada | Tous
Cours de l'or et de l'argent pour les pays mentionnés : Canada | Tous
<< Article précedent
Evaluer : Note moyenne :5 (2 votes)
>> Article suivant
Publication de commentaires terminée
  Tous Favoris Mieux Notés  
The same arguments were heard when workers asked for 40 hours/week or for paid holidays. It was 'unrealistic', 'impossible', 'radical' and so on.

Due to automatisation and globalisation, occidental countries will NEVER return to full employment situation. It is very important that our societies find new economic models, redistributing work and wealth. We have 3 possibilities: Limit social welfare (called entitlements by some rich people), wich will end in revolution; continue with welfare, wich will end with a class of pariah people, a kind of feudalisation; or take a brave decision for redistribution of wealth, in form of Basic Income (perhaps not $20.000).

Some years from now we will be in war or we will have Basic Income economy, a blooming society of culture, leisure and sport, made possible by the advances of technology. A paradise or a hell, we have to choose. But I see the reaction of people suposedly intelligent like the author of the article (radical stupidity?), and I am very pessimistic. Once again in history of mankind, a significant change of society will only be possible AFTER the revolution and bloodbath.
Evaluer :   0  2Note :   -2
EmailPermalink

Someday academia will be radically reformed and these "intellectuals" will finally have their wings clipped by reality. They have the public deceived that their precious knowledge is indispensable in creating products, companies and jobs when most of their knowledge base are useless academic constructs and theories. The usefull knowledge they do teach will someday be taught on utube for free for those interested. Like monopoly Allopathic medicine and GMO food, it's just another western hoax the world is waking up to.

The Chinese copied our college system and now have large "ant herds" of disillusioned underemployed college grads in their large cities. Victims of drinking the deceptive American "koolade". Just more fraud from the United States of Deception.
Evaluer :   2  0Note :   2
EmailPermalink
Dernier commentaire publié pour cet article
The same arguments were heard when workers asked for 40 hours/week or for paid holidays. It was 'unrealistic', 'impossible', 'radical' and so on. Due to automatisation and globalisation, occidental countries will NEVER return to full employment situatio  Lire la suite
jox - 07/07/2014 à 15:30 GMT
Note :  0  2
Top articles
Flux d'Actualités
TOUS
OR
ARGENT
PGM & DIAMANTS
PÉTROLE & GAZ
AUTRES MÉTAUX