Fermer X Les cookies sont necessaires au bon fonctionnement de 24hGold.com. En poursuivant votre navigation sur notre site, vous acceptez leur utilisation.
Pour en savoir plus sur les cookies...
AnglaisFrancais
Cours Or & Argent en

The Evil 1%

IMG Auteur
Publié le 24 octobre 2011
902 mots - Temps de lecture : 2 - 3 minutes
( 12 votes, 4/5 ) , 4 commentaires
Imprimer l'article
  Article Commentaires Commenter Notation Tous les Articles  
0
envoyer
4
commenter
Notre Newsletter...
SUIVRE : Bastiat Rothbard
Rubrique : Editoriaux

 

 

 

The "occupy" protest movement is thriving off the claim that the 99% are being exploited by the 1%, and there is truth in what they say. But they have the identities of the groups wrong. They imagine that it is the 1% of highest wealth holders who are the problem. In fact, that 1% includes some of the smartest, most innovative people in the country – the people who invent, market, and distribute material blessings to the whole population. They also own the capital that sustains productivity and growth.


But there is another 1% out there, those who do live parasitically off the population and exploit the 99%. Moreover, there is a long intellectual tradition, dating back to the late middle ages that draws attention to the strange reality that a tiny minority lives off the productive labor of the overwhelming majority.


I’m speaking of the State, which even today is made up of a tiny sliver of the population, but is the direct cause of all the impoverishing wars, inflation, taxes, regimentation, and social conflict. This 1% is the direct cause of the violence, the censorship, the unemployment, and vast amounts of poverty, too.

Look at the numbers, rounding from latest data. The U.S. population is 307 million. There are about 20 million government employees at all levels, which makes 6.5%. But 6.2 million of these people are public school teachers, whom I think we can say are not really the ruling elite. That takes us down to 4.4%.


We can knock of another half million who work for the post office, and probably the same who work for various service department bureaus. Probably another million do not work in any enforcement arm of the State, and there’s also the amazing labor-pool fluff that comes with any government work. Local governments do not cause nation-wide problems (usually), and the same might be said of the 50 states. The real problem is at the federal level (8.5 million), from which we can subtract fluff, drones, and service workers.

In the end, we end up with about 3 million people who constitute what is commonly called the State. For short, we can just call these people the 1%.


The 1% do not generate any wealth of their own. Everything they have they get by taking from others under the cover of law. They live at our expense. Without us, the State as an institution would die.


Here we come to the core of the issue. What is the State and what does it do? There is vast confusion about this issue, insofar as it is talked about at all. For hundreds of years, people have imagined that the State might be an organic institution that develops naturally out of some social contract. Or perhaps the State is our benefactor because it provides services we could not otherwise provide for ourselves.


In classrooms and in political discussions, there is very little if any honest talk about what the State is and what it does. But in the libertarian tradition, matters are much clearer. From Bastiat to Rothbard, the answer has been before our eyes. The State is the only institution in society that is permitted by law to use aggressive force against person and property.


Let’s understand through a simple example. Let’s say you go into a restaurant and hate the wallpaper. You can complain and try to persuade the owner to change it. If he doesn’t change it, you can decide not to go back. But if you break in, take money out of the cash register, buy paint, and cover the wallpaper yourself, you will be charged with criminal wrongdoing and perhaps go to jail. Everyone in society agrees that you did the wrong thing.


But the State is different. If it doesn’t like the wallpaper, it can pass a law (or maybe even not that) and send a memo. It can mandate a change. It doesn’t have to do the repainting. The State can make you repaint the place. If you refuse, you are guilty of criminal wrongdoing.


Same goals, different means, two very different sets of criminals. The State is the institution that essentially redefines criminal wrongdoing to make itself exempt from the law that governs everyone else.


It is the same with every tax, every regulation, every mandate, and every single word of the federal code. It all represents coercion. Even in the area of money and banking, it is the State that created and sustains the Fed and the dollar because it forcibly limits competition in money and banking, preventing people from making gold or silver money, or innovating in other ways. And in some ways, this is the most dreadful intervention of all, because it allows the State to destroy our money on a whim.


The State is everybody’s enemy. Why don’t the protesters get this? Because they are victims of propaganda by the State, doled out in public school, that attempts to blame all human suffering on private parties and free enterprise. They do not comprehend that the real enemy is the institution that brainwashes them to think the way they do.


They are right that society is rife with conflicts, and that the contest is wildly lopsided. It is indeed the 99% vs. the 1%. They’re just wrong about the identity of the enemy.



Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr

LewRockwell.com



Article originally published at www.lewrockwell.com here  

 


<< Article précedent
Evaluer : Note moyenne :4 (12 votes)
>> Article suivant
Publication de commentaires terminée
  Tous Favoris Mieux Notés  
good article, thanks. Needs to go to a wider audience.
Jim C. had the obvious and appropriate response to the Rockwell article. A certain amount of 'state' is absolutely necessary. I recall after Bunnypants Bush took the teeth out of the FDA the number of Americans felled by food poisoning went through the roof and need I mention what happened when Clinton and Bunnypants took the teeth out of the regulatory arms of the SEC and the Federal banking watchdogs? We have the situation of today, right now. I humbly suggest that we think more along the lines of government departments being more monitors than regulators. It's obvious that there will always be those who want to run damaging self-enrichment scams which do NOT follow the principles of truly free enterprise. Who will deal with the unavoidable thieves and crooks? There ARE ways of making sure that state observation of the practice of capitalism need not become an intrusive and meddling impediment to the free enterprise process itself. I'll risk being hounded; but I will state that what we have today is NOT capitalism by any interpretation. It's rapidly progressing from a free-for-all to a complete and destructive anarchy.
IT IS pretty much DEAD ON.....BUT....UNFORTUNATELY.....
The government is only HALF of the problem!
As the other part IS A PRIVATE ENTITY....THE FED!!!
As ANY SOVEREIGN COUNTRY has the DUTY and OBLIGATION to PRINT ITS OWN MONEY without any interest to reimbourse TO ANYONE!!! BUT the USA doesn't DO THAT, DO THEY!!!
Now follow the money trail, and YOU WILL find the culprit!
If PRINTING YOUR OWN MONEY seems to be the LOGICAL CHOICE to NOT PUT YOUR PEOPLE IN DEBT...
What would prompt a Government to BORROW ITS MONEY at INTEREST INSTEAD!???

Could it be that a HANDFUL of GOVERNMENT PEOPLE would have SOMETHING TO GAIN by this!????
Or is it NOT ONLY SOMETHING TO GAIN but also... NOTHING TO LOSE !???

EXPLANATION:
If you consider that the BANKSTERS behind the Federal Reserve (a private bank, no more Federal then Federal Express!) COULD PAY OFF SOMEONE (I would NEVER say Obama, or Bush, or Clinton)...
To say KEEP the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT ALIVE and their DEBT-MONEY SYSTEM INTACT...
so as to continue to fill their VERY DEEP POCKETS.... With EVER MORE MONEY!!!
With ALL PARTIES KNOWING FULL WELL that IN THE END... NONE OF THEM will ever PAY NEITHER THE CAPITAL, NOR THE INTEREST, AND NOR THE PAYOFF MONEY ON THE NOW DUE DEBT...
AND THAT INSTEAD...
THE PEOPLE... WILL BE STUCK WITH THE BILL...
BEING TAXED as HELL to REPAY THE CAPITAL....THE INTERESTS...AND THE PAYOFF....
(let's call it the National Debt!)
I say: Both the GOVERNEMENT AND the FED...are SERIOUSLY GUILTY!!!
Evaluer :   1  0Note :   1
EmailPermalink
True, the State is unproductive. True, the 'Occupiers' are focused in the wrong direction.

But again Lew Rockwell does not specify how much 'state' is necessary. I suspect his answer would be, "none." Anarchy.

I hear no defense of the limited concept of government espoused by the founding fathers, nor by the orginal Libertarians (not to mention Randians): government as the respository of retaliatory force, for both internal and external defense of the nation, for the preservation of individual rights.

So, what say you Lew Rockwell?
Evaluer :   6  -4Note :   10
EmailPermalink
Dernier commentaire publié pour cet article
good article, thanks. Needs to go to a wider audience. Lire la suite
el-greco@monaco.mc - 25/10/2011 à 17:27 GMT
Top articles
Flux d'Actualités
TOUS
OR
ARGENT
PGM & DIAMANTS
PÉTROLE & GAZ
AUTRES MÉTAUX