Fermer X Les cookies sont necessaires au bon fonctionnement de 24hGold.com. En poursuivant votre navigation sur notre site, vous acceptez leur utilisation.
Pour en savoir plus sur les cookies...
AnglaisFrancais
Cours Or & Argent en

Reply To Gary North

IMG Auteur
Publié le 04 mars 2013
782 mots - Temps de lecture : 1 - 3 minutes
( 73 votes, 2,2/5 ) , 8 commentaires
Imprimer l'article
  Article Commentaires Commenter Notation Tous les Articles  
0
envoyer
8
commenter
Notre Newsletter...
Rubrique : Editoriaux


     Last week, extreme right-wing, hyper-patriot blogger and "Christian Reconstructionist" Gary North published a piece that bounced around the Web titled "James Howard Kunstler: Foul-Mouthed Apologist for the Good Old Boys." Gary North was inflamed because I had put out a recent blog inveighing against the chain-store rape of local economies from sea to shining sea. North wrote:


Consider his [JHK's] most recent screed. It begins with an attack on the most successful free market retailing operation on earth, Walmart. He uses Walmart as a representative company for all of the low-price, high-volume box stores. He hates them all.


In the United States, millions of customers return day after day to buy at stores like these. But Kunstler, who is an arrogant Leftie elitist, dismisses them as helpless rubes who need protection from price competitive retailers. And who will supply this protection? The Good Old Boys.


     My point, of course was that the chain store business model, and WalMart in particular, has destroyed local Main Street economies all over America, as well as the networks of social relations that went with these economies, in which local business owners employed local people and had to take responsibility for how they treated them. The damage to American civic life ought to be self-evident in the desolation of thousands of crumbling traditional downtowns, the extermination of a whole class of local business owners (and the local institutions they cared for), the funneling of business profits out of every local community to a few corporate bank accounts in distant places, as well as the desecration of the once-rural landscape outside our towns, now a uniformly profaned wilderness of parking lots and the tilt-up warehouses of chain-store commerce.


     My further point was that the WalMart model of business now faces its own demise as America contends with the realities of a what will prove to be a permanent energy and capital formation crisis, requiring us to downscale our activities and rebuild fine-grained local networks of economic interdependency. 


      Gary North's intemperate response to these ideas illustrates everything that has become malignant and dishonorable in conservative politics lately. It also displays a brand of shocking stupidity that bodes darkly for America's political future. There are many towns across America where WalMart is not just the only place to buy all goods, but the chief employer, too. How is it a good thing for anyone's home town to be dominated by such a single despotic entity? How does it square with the rhetoric about "liberty" spouted by conservatives? How is it so different in kind from the tyrannical one-party rule of the old soviet system that is the pole star of conservative animus?


     WalMart is the largest corporate employer in the USA and most of its rank-and-file store workers barely get paid enough to live on (those with children fall statistically below the official poverty line). They have no control over their working lives, are cruelly deprived of full-time status in order to avoid giving them health insurance, have been subject to lock-ins during late-shifts, and are forced to attend off-hour browbeating  ("coaching") sessions with no pay. WalMart trumpets "made-in-America" propaganda around its stores but buys the majority of its merchandise from foreign countries -- over $20 billion in merchandise from China every year, and more from other overseas vendors.


     For Gary North, the supposed benefits of "bargain shopping" trump the fantastic damage that this mode of commerce wreaks on the nation. It was some bargain to sacrifice all the local business enterprises in this land, and the careers that went with them, and the incomes they produced, and the choices they represented so that underpaid chain store serfs could save five bucks on a toaster-oven.  Gary North writes:


Kunstler is merely one more hapless defender of local business oligopolies. He stands in front of the freight train of price competition, yelling: "Stop!" He will be run over, just as they all have been run over.


     Gary North is not being ironic when he characterizes the Americans whose independent businesses, lives, and towns were destroyed by WalMart as "good ole boys." The owners of all those shuttered mom-and-pop stores along the vacant Main Streets of America were oligarchs?


      Gary North is exactly what I have in mind when I refer to the "corn-pone Nazis" who threaten the political future of this country. Either he's a hostage to his own ideological rigor mortis or he is a genuine fool.  He's certainly a fake patriot. He literally knows not what he actually stands for. There is no precedent for such malign totalitarian nonsense in American history. But it matches the spell that Germany fell under in 1933. And it can happen here, too.


<< Article précedent
Evaluer : Note moyenne :2,2 (73 votes)
>> Article suivant
Publication de commentaires terminée
  Tous Favoris Mieux Notés  
S.W.,i am not quite certain where your sense of frustration is coming from. Do you not base your decisions on precious metal ownership on how Walmart has transformed America? True, it is not quite as good as a Tom DiLorenzo article relitigating the American Civil War for timely information on what the market is likely to do in the near (or long) term. But my favourite precious metals advisor is Mac Slavo. When he goes on about the best ways to make your house an inpenetrable fortress, i run right out and load up on as much gold as i can carry. i mean, what savvy investor wouldn't with such brilliant advice?

People lost their respect for the meaning of words long ago. Think ketchup is a vegetable; that one courtesy of the Great Communicator himself, Ronnie Ray Gun. Or enhanced interrogation now is used when the proper word is torture. And collateral damage now means anyone unintentionally murdered. And you just know that if they pass an education improvement act, graduates will come out dumber than when they entered school. Names are now employed only to make things seem like something they actually are not.

In fairness, there are a reasonable number of articles on the precious metals that can be found here. What i would like to see more of are pieces that attempt to come up with solutions for the economic mess that has gripped the planet. We are very seldomly treated to anyone offering anything more than a catalogue of examples of what has gone wrong and if they have any solutions to offer, they are always the same trite nonsense that if we would only get rid of paper money and replace it with gold, all will be well with the world again. Most do not even go that far. They offer solutions for protecting your personal wealth; usually buying gold, but also guns and kevlar vests.

And so i put it to those who run the site; give us serious articles by folks who can offer us solutions for ending the sovereign debt crisis and getting the economy back on track. Oh, and while you are at it, upgrade your servers. They are pathetically slow. Your aim should be to increase traffic, not drive people elsewhere because they get frustrated having to wait 3 to 5 minutes for a page to load.
Evaluer :   3  2Note :   1
EmailPermalink
Vox...that's absolute 5 star gold.
Evaluer :   1  0Note :   1
EmailPermalink
Well... North stays in his little hidey-hole and buys stuff online and Kunstler is holed up in his hobby farm tending to his chickens.
Both have a few good points and several which are out of touch with reality.

Isn't this site about GOLD 24hrs a day anyway?
Evaluer :   5  0Note :   5
EmailPermalink
Typical Kunstler. Senseless elitest liberal gibberish. For some unknown reason, Kunstler prefers a demonstrably miniscule number of jobs that pay 'a living wage' to many MANY jobs that allow opportunity in communities where very little opportunity existed. I was reared in rural Louisiana (Columbia) and saw the half dozen main street merchants who made a middle-class existence based off of the lack of choice of the rural population. Charging far too much for shoes and clothing, their livelihood hinged on the plight of people further from competition. Then, when competition arrives, the Kunstlers, who think that competition is bad, carp and moan about that little gaggle of merchants that have no leverage to compete in return. I worked for a hardware/feed and seed store from the age of 16 until I graduated high school. This was in the late 70's. The minimum wage was just north of $3 I believe. I was paid $1.75 an hour working for this small, family-owned operation. The adults who worked there were paid more, but not more than the equivalent of what they would have made at a Walmart. The 'Leave It To Beaver' revision of history wears thin for those who actually lived and worked in those places that Kunstler idealizes.

You know, actually, Walmart has never put ANYONE out of business. The clientelle put businesses out of business by voting with their feet. You can still go into those small towns and still find merchants who service customers outside the doors of Walmart. And, as a firefighter who inspects those businesses on a regular basis, I find Chinese wares in those small mom and pops, also. and the ones who stock the much more expensive American made products have made a choice that works for them. So, if the merchant can choose what merchandise he wants, why can't a customer have a choice like a Walmart as to where to spend HIS hard-earned money?

Another thing that the Kunstlers never seem to get around to is the EXPANSION of the economy that Walmart brings to a community. If I spend all of my money on Easter clothes for my children, then, I have no money for groceries, and vice versa. if I spend all my money on tires for my car then I have no money to go to the movies. But, If I can go to Walmart and buy Easter outfits, which truck drivers, and warehousemen, and clerks, and janitors, and managers, and all of the rest of the support staff sell, and I have enough money left to go to Safeway and buy a ham and rolls and the eggs to devil and tea and greenbeans, then, I've helped support even MORE people. And if I buy my tires at Walmart, and have money left over to take my kids to the movies, then there's ANOTHER business that I can patronize that I wouldn't have the opportunity to if I'd spent all my money on tires at a local merchant. Its a well established fact that discount merchants improve local economies by leaving more money in the pockets of people that allow them to do all manner of things. Having a house painted (Walmart doesn't paint houses), having fences built (Walmart doesn't build fences). Oh, and guess what: no one ELSE paints houses or builds fence if you have to spend all of your money buying Easter outfits and tires. Thank you, Walmart!
Evaluer :   4  7Note :   -3
EmailPermalink
I think that the "reductio ad hitlerum" is inadequate and discredits your defense.
Evaluer :   1  1Note :   0
EmailPermalink
Small businesses in America drove the economy at one time and I wouldn't necessarily label them inefficient. I would rather, under all circumstances, purchase from a small business than something like Walmart. I know, I'm 'old fashioned', out of touch and ultimately 'anti-capitalism' simply because I'd rather support someone who made their way and their livelihood from a business they created from practically nothing. I admire that. What we're left with according to the 'logic' of Mr. North is that the reality of the small business model in America is inappropriate and has seen its day. I wonder what's going to happen to all those folks with good ideas who want to put them into practice. Will people who want to start a small business simply give up because they cannot reconcile operating 'inefficiently' with 'inefficient' employees with the possibilities of a successful operation? Yeah, I understand, Walmart is efficient and they're bottom line proves it; but without China, they're simply taking up space. Give me the Main Street small operation anytime - a place where I can hang out and shoot the breeze, perhaps bargain for a better deal or ask for a little more time to pay the bill. What Mr. North obviously neglected to consider is the fact that businesses like Walmart ultimately lead to less choice rather than more, less competition and its attendant result of a better product and better service. I don't fancy the possibility of Walmart selling everything, owning everything and wiping out the small guy before they even get started. Doesn't sound like capitalism to me.
Evaluer :   8  1Note :   7
EmailPermalink
Well, Gary North hit a home run with his critique of James Howard "Industrial Civilization Bad" Kunstler. It seems James can foul mouth whomever he wishes, but becomes indignant when he's called out for it.

What's REALLY gnawing at Kunstler's graw? He voted for Obama, which he admitted, and he can't stand (I suppose) the 'slow' pace of his hero's converting America to a Socialist state. To allow free enterprise to create a Walmart is an atrocity for Kunstler.

Kunstler would have preferred (again I suppose) an immediate - and unconstitutional - banning of private automobiles, the closure of all unsightly strip malls (Walmart at the top of the list) and probably anything remotely having to do with electricity. And add the restructuring of public school programs to emphasize the construction of teepees, trench latrines, basic fire making, and first aid from aloe Vera - in other words a civilization returned to a Boy Scout level.

Good work Gary!
Evaluer :   10  5Note :   5
EmailPermalink
In the early 60's, I watched Safeway put several small grocery stores and one meat market out of business. Uh, er, no. Chain stores were far more efficient and it was that efficiency that was more competitive and therefore survived and prospered. The slaughterhouse went away because centrally located meat packing plants were more efficient.

Claiming that employees are underpaid is a typical line of unionesque B.S. Why should the purchaser pay more for wages than is necessary? Yes bubba, the end consumer foots ALL the bills including taxes for the over-paid employees. What do these clerks and shelf-stockers produce anyway?

Hell, let's just enact a law making minimum wage $20USD/hour with 4 hour days. That way we have fuller employment and a tax revenue stream.

The typical consumer is a highly specialized curious non-producer. They have minimal capacity for job flexibility and have a grossly inflated idea of their true worth to an employer. Kind of like the author of this article. The average consumer can't make the simple decision to avoid crippling debt. Ergo, their wage is below some standard of living. Bubba, expenses grow to meet and surpass all forms of income. That is the way of first-worlders.

Gary North might have a drubbing coming, but not on this issue. The consumer chose so it is time for you to shut up. Or are you suggesting we make a law to force people to buy from inefficient markets in order to support inefficient businessmen and their inefficient employees? But of course this will enhance the tax revenue stream making vote buying of the least efficient members of society.

Those who can - do. Those who can't - teach.





Evaluer :   5  7Note :   -2
EmailPermalink
Dernier commentaire publié pour cet article
Vox...that's absolute 5 star gold. Lire la suite
S W. - 05/03/2013 à 11:05 GMT
Note :  1  0
Top articles
Flux d'Actualités
TOUS
OR
ARGENT
PGM & DIAMANTS
PÉTROLE & GAZ
AUTRES MÉTAUX