Fermer X Les cookies sont necessaires au bon fonctionnement de 24hGold.com. En poursuivant votre navigation sur notre site, vous acceptez leur utilisation.
Pour en savoir plus sur les cookies...
AnglaisFrancais
Cours Or & Argent en

Most gold bulls will be right for the wrong reasons

IMG Auteur
Publié le 25 février 2014
700 mots - Temps de lecture : 1 - 2 minutes
( 14 votes, 4,1/5 ) , 2 commentaires
Imprimer l'article
  Article Commentaires Commenter Notation Tous les Articles  
0
envoyer
2
commenter
Notre Newsletter...
Rubrique : Or et Argent



An interesting aspect of the gold market is that most analysis is off track, with the reasons put forward for being bullish generally being further off-track than the reasons put forward for being bearish. That's despite gold bulls having the long-term price trend and fundamentals in their favour. The problem is that most gold bulls pay scant attention to the real fundamental price drivers and focus on things that don't matter. A good example is the current focus on the possible reduction in annual gold production stemming from the combination of rising costs and last year's decline in the gold price.

The idea that a potential decline in annual gold production is an important reason for being bullish on gold is so far off track and reflects such a basic misunderstanding of price formation in the gold market that any analyst who promotes this idea should be ignored. As we've explained many times, the gold-mining industry adds a tiny percentage (about 1.5%) to the total supply of gold each year. This means that if the mining industry's annual production were to fall by 10%, the effect on the total supply of gold over the course of a year -- and, since supply and demand are always equal, the effect on the total demand for gold over the course of a year -- would be about 0.15%. This is trivial.

Note that gold is the only commodity for which changes in current production will never have a significant effect on the price trend, although we hasten to add that for the same reason (the high level of the existing above-ground supply relative to new mine supply) the effect of annual production changes are also generally small enough to be ignored when analysing silver's prospects.

Another example of the bad analysis that permeates the ranks of gold bulls is the idea that gold demand can be determined by adding up the flows of gold between different parts of the market. Such flows include the transfer of gold from coin dealers to the general public, the transfer of gold from outside to inside China, the transfer of gold from bullion ETFs to other holders, and the transfer of gold from commercial traders to jewellery buyers in India. For every buyer there must always be a seller, so adding up the quantity of gold bought during a period will generally tell you nothing about why the gold price did what it did in the past or what the gold price will likely do in the future.

The fact is that the total demand for gold will always be equal to the total supply of gold, which will always be equal to the total aboveground gold inventory. The demand for gold was equal to the total aboveground gold inventory when the price was peaking at $1920 in 2011 and it was equal to the total aboveground gold inventory when the price was bottoming at $1180 last year. What, then, determines the price?

The price is not determined by the volume bought/sold; at the most basic level, it is determined by the relative desires of buyers and sellers to change their current positioning. If buyers are more motivated than sellers, the price will rise. If sellers are more motivated than buyers, the price will fall. Both a price rise and a price fall could occur on either rising or falling volume.

Consequently, what gold-market analysts should do is concentrate on the factors that influence the motivation to hold gold. This generally means concentrating on macro-economic factors such as real interest rates, credit spreads, the yield curve, inflation expectations, and the health of the banking sector. Strangely, gold bears are often better at this than gold bulls. The gold bears are currently not interpreting the economic backdrop correctly (most of them wrongly believe that a real recovery is underway), but at least they are looking for clues in the right places.

If you are bullish on gold you are almost certainly going to be right over the next few years, regardless of how spurious your reasoning happens to be. Being bullish for the right reasons will only matter when the long-term bull market is near its end.


<< Article précedent
Evaluer : Note moyenne :4,1 (14 votes)
>> Article suivant
Publication de commentaires terminée
  Tous Favoris Mieux Notés  
Steve hi, I just want to raise a point: price of gold is NOT a function of supply and demand because gold itself IS the price (of the goods and services traded). Historically gold used to be the tender for all economic activity and printed currency used to be the representative of gold until US left gold based system. So the value of gold is calculated against the goods that it can buy wheter it be printed currency or grain. When there's a lot of grain in the market you can trade less gold for an ounce of grain. Thus when there's trillions of dollars circulating in the system you should be able to trade less gold for more dollars. The other comentator rightfully pointed to the paper gold (which is non-existent in material form), the leverage of the market manipulators who hold large amounts of the real thing, resulting in todays low dollar-to-gold exchange rates (mind you .. NOT low price of gold). Anyway, all I want to say is that the value of gold derives not from supply and demand of the metal (given that it is scarce naturally), but from it's ability to carry a value that can be used to set values of other things. After all, what use of any given metal for a person if it is not a useful tool for something?
Evaluer :   6  0Note :   6
EmailPermalink
Steve, I respectfully dissagree. You state that "supply will always equal demand". Myself and many others well educated on the subject, believe that for a long time, gold has been "rehypothecated", ie. same ounce of gold sold multiple times, thus having multiple claims on it. This has been done in an effort to keep the price down, during all of this exponential growth of "money" printing ( in reality debt printing). This is not just a theory, as there have been older fed documents released that explicitly state that gold swaps and "leasing" between central banks, have been used for this purpose. Unfortunately, many people who think they are invested in actual gold are fooling themselves, if they are buying things like GLD and SLV ETFs. So saying that there is enough gold to go around, is not an accurate statement. There is enough gold, but only at a much higher price.

The only reasons prices are not much higher, are 1) real gold is being leveraged, likely about 10:1, and 2) other market manipulations, such as illegal market corners by large trading banks, allowing them to manipulate the price with short positions, etc... And make a ton of money off it. This of course goes "unnoticed" by regulators, although I did notice that the largest European regulator was recently looking into the London gold fixing, which they were suspecting as likely as big or bigger a fraud than LIBOR was. Shortly after this announcement, deutchbank pulled out of the London fix for some reason. I know you have heard all this information before, so I am assuming you either just don't believe it, and still think it is just conspiracy somehow, in spite of all the facts (huge documented short and long positions in both metals by JP Morgan, no gold left for Germany to take back from New York, fed minutes, refusal to audit us gold reserves, etc.....) or you somehow don't think any of this affects the price?!? Please explain your reasoning further. Trust me, these people can not be trusted, and thus the current price of gold is not an accurate reflection of its actual value.
Evaluer :   7  1Note :   6
EmailPermalink
Dernier commentaire publié pour cet article
Steve hi, I just want to raise a point: price of gold is NOT a function of supply and demand because gold itself IS the price (of the goods and services traded). Historically gold used to be the tender for all economic activity and printed currency used  Lire la suite
cem - 26/02/2014 à 06:23 GMT
Note :  6  0
Top articles
Flux d'Actualités
TOUS
OR
ARGENT
PGM & DIAMANTS
PÉTROLE & GAZ
AUTRES MÉTAUX