| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Answer To :S W. - 2/21/2015 at 8:40 PM GMT
I will hazard a guess and suggest that at least 95% of the world's population (>20 yrs old) would be clueless as to how dangerous it is to leave money in a bank.
Depositors are unsecured creditors and are therefore at risk of not being able to get money out if and when they want, or more specifically, need it.
Now is as good a time as ever to take it out and swap it for real money !!!
Good stuff Jackass.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Answer To :Doom - 2/16/2015 at 2:27 AM GMT
I certainly concede Casey's omniscience is odd, but not proof that he's "in on it".
That said, large conspiracies have been successfully enacted for years, so I can't rule out a conspiracy just because it would take a few thousand people (cf Gulf of Tonkin), especially when banks acknowledge they do manipulate, at least to some extent.
But, please, can you provide a plausible explanation why gold purchasing can have record-setting year after year after year, and "We Buy Gold" places can pop up everywhere (and they don't sell gold), and central banks can increase holdings pretty everywhere (but the US), production can decline...and yet the price just keeps dropping.
If you can give no explanation for this, can you provide a historical preced...
|
| |
Answer To :Doom - 2/16/2015 at 2:27 AM GMT
I certainly concede Casey's omniscience is odd, but not proof that he's "in on it".
That said, large conspiracies have been successfully enacted for years, so I can't rule out a conspiracy just because it would take a few thousand people (cf Gulf of Tonkin), especially when banks acknowledge they do manipulate, at least to some extent.
But, please, can you provide a plausible explanation why gold purchasing can have record-setting year after year after year, and "We Buy Gold" places can pop up everywhere (and they don't sell gold), and central banks can increase holdings pretty everywhere (but the US), production can decline...and yet the price just keeps dropping.
If you can give no explanation for this, can you provide a historical preced...
|
| |
Doug Casey found guilty of incompetence by innuendo concerning the world-wide conspiracy to manipulate gold prices.
No hard evidence required, just admissions that banks regularly buy and sell in the gold market.
If GATA had hard evidence, why have they had such massive failures in the courts?
If GATA had proof, why are only the conspiracy theorists aligned with GATA?
If GATA could sway a court, wouldn't GATA be entitled to compensatory damages and court costs for the myriad of cases brought?
The problem with belief systems is the iron-clad rule that any evidence contrary to the belief MUST be denied, refuted, ridiculed and the offender duly chastised in the public forum.
Oh, and belief systems require no proofs. It is solely a matt...
|
| |
 | Doom - 2/16/2015 at 1:27 AM GMTProfile not specified - check his comments (44) | |
 Doug Casey's omniscience vs. the many records of gold price suppression  (4) |
| - Chris Powell - GATA |
I certainly concede Casey's omniscience is odd, but not proof that he's "in on it".
That said, large conspiracies have been successfully enacted for years, so I can't rule out a conspiracy just because it would take a few thousand people (cf Gulf of Tonkin), especially when banks acknowledge they do manipulate, at least to some extent.
But, please, can you provide a plausible explanation why gold purchasing can have record-setting year after year after year, and "We Buy Gold" places can pop up everywhere (and they don't sell gold), and central banks can increase holdings pretty everywhere (but the US), production can decline...and yet the price just keeps dropping.
If you can give no explanation for this, can you provide a historical preced... |
| Read this articleReply |
Doug Casey found guilty of incompetence by innuendo concerning the world-wide conspiracy to manipulate gold prices.
No hard evidence required, just admissions that banks regularly buy and sell in the gold market.
If GATA had hard evidence, why have they had such massive failures in the courts?
If GATA had proof, why are only the conspiracy theorists aligned with GATA?
If GATA could sway a court, wouldn't GATA be entitled to compensatory damages and court costs for the myriad of cases brought?
The problem with belief systems is the iron-clad rule that any evidence contrary to the belief MUST be denied, refuted, ridiculed and the offender duly chastised in the public forum.
Oh, and belief systems require no proofs. It is solely a matt...
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
