On Reinstating the Draft

IMG Auteur
Published : February 17th, 2009
593 words - Reading time : 1 - 2 minutes
( 0 vote, 0/5 )
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
0
Send
0
comment
Our Newsletter...
Category : Best of web

 

 

 

 

Much has been made by the new administration of the idea of national service and volunteerism.  While service to one’s community is certainly admirable, it is not the federal government’s place to “encourage” or promote volunteerism.  Moreover, there are troubling signs that national service could transition from voluntary to mandatory, or de facto mandatory, such as the requirement of service in order to be granted a diploma, or something along those lines.


 

Involuntary servitude was supposed to be abolished by the 13th Amendment, but things like Selective Service and the income tax make me wonder how serious we really are in defending just basic freedom.  The income tax enslaves workers for nearly 4 months out of a year by garnishing what amounts to all their wages in that period of time.  A military draft could demand your very life, without your consent.  This should be unthinkable in a free society.


 

Proponents of reinstating the draft claim it is needed to protect liberty from enemies abroad.  But what about the enemies of liberty right here at home?  I am convinced that there are more threats to American liberty within the 10 mile radius of my office on Capitol Hill than there are on the rest of the globe.  If we would get our troops off of foreign soil, those perceived enemies of our liberty abroad are much more likely to stand down and let us be.  We have more than enough troops to mind our own business and defend ourselves.  It is only for world domination that we have a troop shortage.


 

Nevertheless, some think recruiting for our military is too low and that the younger generation will not answer the call of duty willingly, and must be drafted by force.  I take extreme exception to this characterization of young people today.  First of all, I believe they correctly see that foreign policy, as unpopular as it has been under Bush, is not significantly changing under Obama, and has little, if anything, to do with defending the United States, and certainly not the Constitution.  Second, many see friends and acquaintances who have voluntarily enlisted, and have taken note of how the soldier, the veteran is treated.  Perhaps rather than blaming younger generations for being selfish, older generations should remember their promises to those who volunteer for military service and be mindful of how they are treated.  Every homeless vet by the side of the road, every suicide, every report of substandard conditions in veteran hospitals is a sign of how we let our military down.  Perhaps we should look to those issues if we have problems with military recruitment, rather than to trample freedom in the name of protecting it.


 

If that is not enough reason, consider that most in the military are against a draft.  There is a vast difference between serving alongside another volunteer, and serving alongside a reluctant conscript.   Americans need to be on the lookout for any propaganda trying to ease us back into the draft.  Too often a flawed foreign policy prompts the need for a draft.  Abolishing the Selective Service is one thing we could do to counter those efforts.


 

Ron Paul

www.house.gov/paul

 

 

Congressman Ron Paul of Texas enjoys a national reputation as the premier advocate for liberty in politics today. Dr. Paul is the leading spokesman in Washington for limited constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, and a return to sound monetary policies based on commodity-backed currency. For more information click on the Project Freedom website.

 

 

Published with the authorization of Dr. Paul.

Copyright Dr. Ron Paul

 

 

 

 

 

<< Previous article
Rate : Average note :0 (0 vote)
>> Next article
Congressman Ron Paul of Texas enjoys a national reputation as the premier advocate for liberty in politics today. Dr. Paul is the leading spokesman in Washington for limited constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, and a return to sound monetary policies based on commodity-backed currency. He is known among both his colleagues in Congress and his constituents for his consistent voting record in the House of Representatives: Dr. Paul never votes for legislation unless the proposed measure is expressly authorized by the Constitution. In the words of former Treasury Secretary William Simon, Dr. Paul is the "one exception to the Gang of 535" on Capitol Hill.
WebsiteMake a donation
Comments closed
Latest comment posted for this article
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
Top articles
World PM Newsflow
ALL
GOLD
SILVER
PGM & DIAMONDS
OIL & GAS
OTHER METALS
Take advantage of rising gold stocks
  • Subscribe to our weekly mining market briefing.
  • Receive our research reports on junior mining companies
    with the strongest potential
  • Free service, your email is safe
  • Limited offer, register now !
Go to website.