Close X Cookies are necessary for the proper functioning of 24hGold.com. By continuing your navigation on our website, you are accepting the use of cookies.
To learn more about cookies ...
EnglishFrench

The TRUTH About the 16th Amendment

IMG Auteur
Published : December 06th, 2012
404 words - Reading time : 1 - 1 minutes
( 2 votes, 4.5/5 ) , 1 commentary
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
0
Send
1
comment
Our Newsletter...
Category : Crisis Watch

 

 

 

 

Being a Constitutional "scholar" educated at Harvard Obama knows this truism, as does your congressman as evidenced by his sworn oath of office. For them to collude in subverting it can be correctly termed a Conspiracy.

The TRUTH About the 16TH AMENDMENT

The most misunderstood amendment is the 16th (1913). It says:
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever
source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard
to any census or enumeration."

If you talk to any tax attorneys or other so called 'tax professionals' they will tell you that the 16th Amendment allowed the income tax to be collected as a direct tax without apportionment among the 50 states. This is totally false, and this is the major problem with today's tax collection efforts. The IRS believes that the income tax can now be collected as a direct tax without apportionment, and collects it in that fashion. It is totally unconstitutional to collect a direct tax, in the 50 states, without apportionment, as we learned in earlier chapters. We are the victims of mass brainwashing by the government.
What is apportionment?

Black's Law Dictionary says,


"Apportion. To divide and distribute proportionally."
"Apportionment. The process by which legislative seats are distributed among units entitled to representation. The U.S. Constitution provides for a census every ten years, on the basis of which Congress apportions representatives according to population; but each state must have at least one representative."


U. S. of A. CONSTITUTION


Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3: "Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the states which may be included within this Union, according to their respective numbers..."
Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4: "No capitation, or other direct tax, shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken."

Direct taxes must be apportioned among the states, not among the people. The 16th Amendment did not change this! As we learned, the income tax is an excise tax on corporate profit, and always has been, therefore it does not need to be apportioned. Before the 16th Amendment, an individual's income was NOT taxable, either with apportionment or without. Eliminating apportionment, among the states, would still require the tax to be imposed on the states, not on the people. To better understand this concept, let's look at an actual example of taxation by apportionment... Read more>>

 

 

<< Previous article
Rate : Average note :4.5 (2 votes)
>> Next article
All the stuff you don't want to know about, but should. And, when you do know, you realize that for the present you are powerless to change it This article is brought to you by the Charleston Voice E-mail List. To subscribe FREE to the distribution list, send an e-mail to the author with 'SUBSCRIBE' in the subject line.
Comments closed
  All Favorites Best Rated  
Perhaps you fail to grasp the definition of "amendment."

Admittedly the article has some foundation, however the errors are most numerous.

Example: government grants privileges? So none of these priviledged activities existed prior to formation of government?
Rate :   0  3Rating :   -3
EmailPermalink
Latest comment posted for this article
Perhaps you fail to grasp the definition of "amendment." Admittedly the article has some foundation, however the errors are most numerous. Example: government grants privileges? So none of these priviledged activities existed prior to formation of gov  Read more
overtheedge - 12/6/2012 at 8:01 PM GMT
Rating :  0  3
Top articles
Latest Comments
Is Silver a Better Bet than Gold...
03 May Roygbiv
"Silver on fire." ??? Even if it goes to 50$ nobody in my environment (and beyond) would recogize it.
Is Silver a Better Bet than Gold...
03 May Roygbiv
One can not invest in gold and or silver !!! You have it and that's it. You converted your paper to something tangible. One can invest ...
License to Steal: Italy’s Highes...
03 May Roygbiv
"Given that theft is no longer a crime, I expect an enormous outbreak of theft from Italian grocery stores. Over the course of a week I ha...
License to Steal: Italy’s Highes...
03 May Roygbiv
Feeling better now after the burp. Continuously thinking about ... gold. Trying to find a definition/description that would end all blablablah<...
License to Steal: Italy’s Highes...
03 May Roygbiv
Feeling better now after the burp. Continuously thinking about ... gold. Trying to find a definition/description that would end all blablablah<...
License to Steal: Italy’s Highes...
03 May Roygbiv
What percentage of Americans are crooks ? Making a living and contributing to GDP ? "What you have in your pocket I want to see in mine !" ??? ...
License to Steal: Italy’s Highes...
03 May Roygbiv
"heling"=dutch and is translated by Google as=fencing. ??? Selling stolen goods I want to find. The Dutch/English dictionary translated it ...
Send Out the Clowns
03 Maysam_site
As you imply, Obamacare's days are numbered. In fact these are the last days of government-protected monopolies like the monopoly that state ...
Most commented articlesFavoritesMore...
World PM Newsflow
ALL
GOLD
SILVER
PGM & DIAMONDS
OIL & GAS
OTHER METALS