Close X Cookies are necessary for the proper functioning of 24hGold.com. By continuing your navigation on our website, you are accepting the use of cookies.
To learn more about cookies ...
EnglishFrench

The TRUTH About the 16th Amendment

IMG Auteur
Published : December 06th, 2012
404 words - Reading time : 1 - 1 minutes
( 2 votes, 4.5/5 ) , 1 commentary
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
0
Send
1
comment
Our Newsletter...
Category : Crisis Watch

 

 

 

 

Being a Constitutional "scholar" educated at Harvard Obama knows this truism, as does your congressman as evidenced by his sworn oath of office. For them to collude in subverting it can be correctly termed a Conspiracy.

The TRUTH About the 16TH AMENDMENT

The most misunderstood amendment is the 16th (1913). It says:
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever
source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard
to any census or enumeration."

If you talk to any tax attorneys or other so called 'tax professionals' they will tell you that the 16th Amendment allowed the income tax to be collected as a direct tax without apportionment among the 50 states. This is totally false, and this is the major problem with today's tax collection efforts. The IRS believes that the income tax can now be collected as a direct tax without apportionment, and collects it in that fashion. It is totally unconstitutional to collect a direct tax, in the 50 states, without apportionment, as we learned in earlier chapters. We are the victims of mass brainwashing by the government.
What is apportionment?

Black's Law Dictionary says,


"Apportion. To divide and distribute proportionally."
"Apportionment. The process by which legislative seats are distributed among units entitled to representation. The U.S. Constitution provides for a census every ten years, on the basis of which Congress apportions representatives according to population; but each state must have at least one representative."


U. S. of A. CONSTITUTION


Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3: "Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the states which may be included within this Union, according to their respective numbers..."
Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4: "No capitation, or other direct tax, shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken."

Direct taxes must be apportioned among the states, not among the people. The 16th Amendment did not change this! As we learned, the income tax is an excise tax on corporate profit, and always has been, therefore it does not need to be apportioned. Before the 16th Amendment, an individual's income was NOT taxable, either with apportionment or without. Eliminating apportionment, among the states, would still require the tax to be imposed on the states, not on the people. To better understand this concept, let's look at an actual example of taxation by apportionment... Read more>>

 

 

<< Previous article
Rate : Average :4.5 (2 votes)
>> Next article
All the stuff you don't want to know about, but should. And, when you do know, you realize that for the present you are powerless to change it This article is brought to you by the Charleston Voice E-mail List. To subscribe FREE to the distribution list, send an e-mail to the author with 'SUBSCRIBE' in the subject line.
Latest comment posted for this article
Perhaps you fail to grasp the definition of "amendment." Admittedly the article has some foundation, however the errors are most numerous. Example: government grants privileges? So none of these priviledged activities existed prior to formation of gov  Read more
overtheedge - 12/6/2012 at 8:01 PM GMT
Rating :  0  3
Top articles
World PM Newsflow
ALL
GOLD
SILVER
PGM & DIAMONDS
OIL & GAS
OTHER METALS
Mining Company News
IMX Resources NL(Cu-Ni-Pa)IXR.AX
Shortfall from Share Purchase Plan to be underwritten
AU$ 0.01+8.33%Trend Power :
Corporate news
IMX Resources NL(Cu-Ni-Pa)IXR.AX
Results of Meeting
AU$ 0.01+8.33%Trend Power :
Corporate news
SpitfireSPI.AX
Notice under Section 708A(5)(e)
AU$ 0.01+11.11%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Entek EnergyETE.AX
Operations Update
AU$ 0.02+22.22%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Agrium Inc.AGU.TO
Agrium Obtains Issuer Bid Exemption Order to Permit Purchases by Way of Private Agreement
CA$ 136.14+0.26%Trend Power :
Corporate news
ConocoPhillips(Oil)COP
Governor plans to call for company buy-out in gas project
US$ 46.82+2.07%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Transcanada PipelinesTRP.TO
Governor plans to call for company buy-out in gas project
CA$ 45.50+0.75%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Encore Acquisition(Oil)EAC
6:13 pm Erickson Air-Crane announces it has been selected by Pan Aviation to provide emergency fire suppression support for the Municipality of Istanbul and the surrounding areas of Turkey
US$ 3.37+1.81%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Rare Element Res.(Au)RES.TO
Rare Element Files Canadian Preliminary Shelf Prospectus to Replace Expiring Shelf Prospectus from 2013
CA$ 0.48+5.43%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Gold Bullion Dev.(Au-Cu-Mo)GBB.V
GOLD BULLION ANNOUNCES FILING OF 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE CASTLE SILVER PROPERTY, GOWGANDA ONTARIO
CA$ 0.02+33.33%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Comments closed
  All Favorites Best Rated  
Perhaps you fail to grasp the definition of "amendment."

Admittedly the article has some foundation, however the errors are most numerous.

Example: government grants privileges? So none of these priviledged activities existed prior to formation of government?
Rate :   0  3Rating :   -3
EmailPermalink