Close X Cookies are necessary for the proper functioning of By continuing your navigation on our website, you are accepting the use of cookies.
To learn more about cookies ...
Gold & Silver Prices in

The TRUTH About the 16th Amendment

IMG Auteur
Published : December 06th, 2012
404 words - Reading time : 1 - 1 minutes
( 2 votes, 4.5/5 ) , 1 commentary
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
Our Newsletter...
Category : Crisis Watch





Being a Constitutional "scholar" educated at Harvard Obama knows this truism, as does your congressman as evidenced by his sworn oath of office. For them to collude in subverting it can be correctly termed a Conspiracy.


The most misunderstood amendment is the 16th (1913). It says:
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever
source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard
to any census or enumeration."

If you talk to any tax attorneys or other so called 'tax professionals' they will tell you that the 16th Amendment allowed the income tax to be collected as a direct tax without apportionment among the 50 states. This is totally false, and this is the major problem with today's tax collection efforts. The IRS believes that the income tax can now be collected as a direct tax without apportionment, and collects it in that fashion. It is totally unconstitutional to collect a direct tax, in the 50 states, without apportionment, as we learned in earlier chapters. We are the victims of mass brainwashing by the government.
What is apportionment?

Black's Law Dictionary says,

"Apportion. To divide and distribute proportionally."
"Apportionment. The process by which legislative seats are distributed among units entitled to representation. The U.S. Constitution provides for a census every ten years, on the basis of which Congress apportions representatives according to population; but each state must have at least one representative."


Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3: "Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the states which may be included within this Union, according to their respective numbers..."
Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4: "No capitation, or other direct tax, shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken."

Direct taxes must be apportioned among the states, not among the people. The 16th Amendment did not change this! As we learned, the income tax is an excise tax on corporate profit, and always has been, therefore it does not need to be apportioned. Before the 16th Amendment, an individual's income was NOT taxable, either with apportionment or without. Eliminating apportionment, among the states, would still require the tax to be imposed on the states, not on the people. To better understand this concept, let's look at an actual example of taxation by apportionment... Read more>>



<< Previous article
Rate : Average note :4.5 (2 votes)
>> Next article
All the stuff you don't want to know about, but should. And, when you do know, you realize that for the present you are powerless to change it This article is brought to you by the Charleston Voice E-mail List. To subscribe FREE to the distribution list, send an e-mail to the author with 'SUBSCRIBE' in the subject line.
Comments closed
  All Favorites Best Rated  
Perhaps you fail to grasp the definition of "amendment."

Admittedly the article has some foundation, however the errors are most numerous.

Example: government grants privileges? So none of these priviledged activities existed prior to formation of government?
Rate :   0  3Rating :   -3
Latest comment posted for this article
Perhaps you fail to grasp the definition of "amendment." Admittedly the article has some foundation, however the errors are most numerous. Example: government grants privileges? So none of these priviledged activities existed prior to formation of gov  Read more
overtheedge - 12/6/2012 at 8:01 PM GMT
Rating :  0  3
Top articles
Latest Comments
Trump’s Best Debate Performance ...
23 Octkevthorne-1
A vote for that woman is a vote for WWIII. Mr Trump is a builder, not a warmonger - do you want a future on earth for you and yours - or Armageddo...
Silver Bull Market in Force
22 OctS W.
Interesting tech analysis here. Good stuff as I have never looked at 'full bars' closing above or below a 20 bar MA. Only ever the close p...
The Fascist Threat
22 Octsam_site
Your idea that extreme right and left fascism meet is brought out in the Spanish Civil War. The globalists created right wing fascism in Germ...
Trump’s Best Debate Performance ...
21 OctThe Recusant-1
Yes, this WAS his best debate performance! But for all the reasons you mentioned, he failed to deliver. And that's why he will be defeated next mon...
Trump VS. Clinton-Who’s “Better”...
21 OctDoom1
Uh...I'm not sure I understand the conclusion here.
Trump’s Best Debate Performance ...
20 OctS W.0
I have only watched the 3rd debate. I am not American. Clinton is a far more polished debater and was far better prepared than Trump. I agr...
Fifteen Years Into the Afghan Wa...
19 Octsam_site
Follow the money folks. Heroin production jumped 13X when the CIA globalists took over Afghan production. You'll never get the sheeple to see the...
My Most Passionate Warning Yet
17 Octstackerguy551
Thank you Mr. Hoffman. I am concerned by the tone of your article, it is pretty scary to say WWIII is probable, and, so it may be, considering some...
Most commented articlesFavoritesMore...
World PM Newsflow