In the same category

What’s Happening To The Argentine Peso?

IMG Auteur
Published : June 14th, 2018
796 words - Reading time : 1 - 3 minutes
( 0 vote, 0/5 )
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
0
Send
0
comment
Our Newsletter...
Category : Gold and Silver

(This item originally appeared at Forbes.com on June 13, 2018.)

Argentina recently agreed to borrow $50 billion from the International Monetary Fund. The currency tanked. What’s going on?

It doesn’t look to me like much of anything unusual is going on. This is just business as usual in Argentina. It is as Argentine as steak for dinner. It has been going on like this for a long, long time. We might wonder–why? Probably, it is a dynamic common in Latin America: periodic currency collapse helps keep the poor under the thumb of the wealthy elite, who keep their money safe overseas. They find a natural ally in the IMF, which shares a similar apparent goal of keeping countries in a continual state of debt servitude. Everyone is fat and happy – everyone in the top 0.1%, that is.

After a decade of stability with a dollar currency board, the Argentine peso has continued its long downward journey

The Argentine peso today is worth about one forty-seven-trillionth of what it was worth in 1940, compared to the U.S. dollar. Hyperinflation is a sad fact of life there. At times, the currency has enjoyed a brief bit of stability against the U.S. dollar, its main foreign currency benchmark. But, this has rarely lasted for long. The most successful stretch was the period of the Argentine currency board, 1990-2001. In the midst of a crisis in 2001, in which it was feared that the currency board would be abandoned and the Argentine peso devalued, a team of economists from the U.S. went to Buenos Aires to promote dollarization. The peso would simply disappear, and be replaced with U.S. dollars, on a 1:1 basis. This would be a very easy thing to do, since the currency board already held dollar foreign reserves equivalent to all the pesos in existence. Pesos were like a “claim check” on dollars held in reserve. They could just ask for their coats back. Since there would be no more peso, there could be no more fears of peso devaluation. El Salvador chose this option, also in 2001, and it has worked well. But, the Argentine government refused this option, and instead chose to abandon the currency board and devalue the currency. It was a clear expression of what their priorities were. They like to play games.

Argentina has a long history of currency depreciation and hyperinflation.

If we look at the central bank’s balance sheet, we find that base money – the number of Argentine pesos in existence – is about 30% higher than it was a year ago. This has been a typical rate of base money growth (“money printing”) over the last several years. The declining value of the peso indicates that this has been too much – the supply of pesos is consistently in excess of demand, and the value falls. I am sure that a country and central bank with Argentina’s history of both hyperinflation and currency boards are well aware of this. The only explanation left is that it is, more or less, on purpose. All the public babble about foreign exchange intervention and so forth is just tomfoolery. If they were in the slightest bit serious, there would be at the very least a reduction in the pace of money-printing.

Despite public concern about exchange rates, the pace of money-printing in Argentina has hardly even paused.

The operation of a currency board is simple: when the market value of the domestic currency is below the target parity with the benchmark foreign currency, the domestic currency is sold to the central bank and the foreign currency is bought. The central bank becomes the highest bidder for the domestic currency in the foreign exchange market. This reduces the amount of domestic currency in existence (the monetary base), and reduces foreign reserves by the equivalent amount. When the value of the domestic currency is above the parity, the central bank becomes the cheapest seller of the domestic currency. The supply of domestic currency increases, alongside foreign reserves.

This is the basic principle of all properly-operating “fixed value” systems – a system in which the domestic currency’s value is held steady with some external benchmark, most commonly an international currency like the dollar or euro, possibly a currency basket, or gold. Most countries in the world today have a fixed-value policy. Argentina could fix its problems overnight, simply by implementing this process. With $60.7 billion in dollar foreign reserves, and a recent exchange rate of 20 pesos/dollar, they could buy back up to 1,214 billion in pesos – more than the 995 billion pesos in existence. We know it works, because they did so in 1990, after a decade of scorching hyperinflation.

Argentina’s problems, today just as in the past, are entirely self-inflicted.

<< Previous article
Rate : Average note :0 (0 vote)
>> Next article
Nathan Lewis was formerly the chief international economist of a firm that provided investment research for institutions. He now works for an asset management company based in New York. Lewis has written for the Financial Times, Asian Wall Street Journal, Japan Times, Pravda, and other publications. He has appeared on financial television in the United States, Japan, and the Middle East.
Comment this article
>Follow all commentairies
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
Log in or Sign up
Latest comment posted for this article
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
Top articles
World PM Newsflow
ALL
GOLD
SILVER
PGM & DIAMONDS
OIL & GAS
OTHER METALS