Articles NewsFlow Gold & Silver Prices Market Briefing

Recevez notre Marketbriefing

In the same category

Schwerpunkt
Member since October 2012
52 commentaries -

0 followers

has posted a comment on the article :

Global Warming Chickenlittleism

- Richard Mills - Ahead of the Herd

"Whilst I am no expert neither are most other folk." Yet you feel free to challenge others credentials and try to influence what others might think of your challengers.

"What I do not respect is the cash for comment drones who live on websites seeking to tear down what their employers do not want." Tell you what I can’t stand, it's people who use misdirection and in fact claim that others are doing exactly what they themselves do, in other words what you’re doing. You have no way to prove your claim that I or anyone here has been hired to discredit the IPCC MMGW bullshit any more than I can prove that you have been hired to discredit anyone who opposes the myth of MMGW.

"The fact is that most of the science community are in agreement that the climate is changing." Please feel free to list those who are pro MMGW, but at the same time please provide proof that they are not being paid directly (by the UN) or indirectly (through governments) to mislead the world on MMGW and that they are really “climate scientists”. Then please list all of those real climate scientists that actually reviewed all of the IPCC data. This is something that can be done as there is a tracking procedure for all reviewers which is how we know that less than a handful actually read, reviewed, all of the material. Contributing something is NOT the same as reviewing what others have contributed and then doing the research to prove or disprove what was submitted by these others.

Has it ever occurred to you that the warming we're supposedly experiencing may be a natural phenomenon? When you consider that real science can prove that in the past, 2000-3000 years ago, the earth was a much warmer place than it is today why are humans suddenly responsible? 1000 years ago it started to cool off does this now mean that the cooler temps are supposed to be the new norm? The old line, follow the money certainly applies here. Who benefits the most with the carbon taxes and other transfers of wealth due to the crap the IPCC is trying to get the world to believe?

All we've seen from you is regurgitated garbage spewed by the liberal pro MMGW bunch, nothing new, no personal experiences, no credible data, nada. You have taken on the man at every opportunity rather than the subject.

"In the end deniers as well as believers need to confront research." How about the pro side confronts real data, you know the things we can all see, things like receding ice sheets supposedly tens of thousands of years old exposing Viking farming communities that are only about 1000 years old? Too much real data for you?

"I do not accept that scientists are part of a plot and I do not accept that research is not studied at length so that flaws can be identified." So, you accept that all scientists that agree with the IPCC crap are honest and not in it for the bucks they get in the way of grants and all "deniers" are slime balls. It's ok for you that all those with a financial interest to keep perpetuating the MMGW myth are the ones supposedly giving peer reviews. It's also ok for you that all who do not agree can't possibly be real peers, real scintists. In other words only those who are with you can peer review your material and as long as you keep paying them they will be your friends.

“I would have thought that people who give a damn about their children and their descendants would try to make the world a better place to live or indeed one where future generations can live. It just shows what is in the hearts and souls of some folk when it is easier to take the money and run and let the next generation figure out how to solve the problems they are going to inherit. Ain't we a lovely bunch!"

Where to start with this stinking pile of liberal tripe? Again, anyone who doesn't agree with you must be corrupt or not give a damn. You would sell our kids into debt slavery for the benefit of all those who reap rewards from things like carbon taxes or the mega corporations who will make billions trying things like carbon sequestration (which by the way has been proven thus far to be faulty technology). You complain about the same mega corporations making money from selling fossil fuels, coal and the like. Where exactly do you separate these two? It's easier for you and those like you to swallow the crap the MMGW bunch feed you then do the research yourself and in the meantime let the mega corporations run away with the money.

What a stinking pile of hierocracy!

Commented 3757 days ago

Send

Beginning of the headline :The nature of the recently released report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is extremely alarmist. The report warns, with a 95% certainty, that global warming is man-made and that the resulting climate change will lead to: Rising temperatures, drought and increasing desertification Warming of the oceans and rising sea levels Shortages of food Loss of ice sheets & shrinking of glaciers Increasing intensity and size of storms There’s no doubt our climate is changing,... Read More

Reply to this comment

You must be logged in to comment an article

8000 characters max.

	RSS feed		24hGold Mobile
	Gold Data Center		Gold & Silver Converter
	Gold coins on eBay		Silver coins on eBay
	Technical Analysis		Fundamental Analysis