In the same category

5 Point Test for Every Investment

IMG Auteur
Published : August 01st, 2013
1602 words - Reading time : 4 - 6 minutes
( 1 vote, 2/5 ) , 2 commentaries
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
0
Send
2
comment
Our Newsletter...
Category : Editorials

The issue is no longer one of waiting to see what the government is going to do; the real issue is what are we as investors going to do?

When I say the investment paradigm has changed, I’m referring to a combination of factors. There are no more solid, safe investments paying any kind of decent yield that most retirees could possibly live on comfortably. Re-read that if you have to. Investors are being forced to take on more risk for yield. Some are doing it using an income strategy, some are not.

CD rates are not just uselessly low, they’re practically insulting. Bonds were once considered some of the safest investments one could make. But now they pay next to nothing and come with all sorts of risk: think Greece, Ireland, or even Detroit as the most recent example.   

The government is pushing money into the economy to create jobs. Just what jobs would that be? I’m not sure when you consider that most of our manufacturing jobs are gone. I see more college educated young adults serving coffee at the Starbucks nearby. I’m not sure if that’s just here or across the nation, but somehow I don’t think my Starbucks has the monopoly on over-educated baristas. I recently saw some statistics that indicated our manufacturing jobs in America are identical to what they were in 1941: 72 years ago. Real income is down 7% in the last 10 years.

I once had a friend accuse me of being a fearmonger. Oh really! Tell that to Betty B., one of our long time readers at Money Forever. Some months ago she wrote in thanking me for my candor in Money Forever: the excerpt below sums up her entire letter and why I disagree with my friend:

“I just hope now that my money will last as long as I live. I once lived very well but I now am trying to be frugal. I worry about older people who did not have anything to fall back on except social security, which for the first time I have to admit, I look forward to my social security check.”

Tell that to the company my son works for where employees have been forced to take across the board salary cuts in order to keep their jobs. Tell that to the millions of retirees who have done what Betty mentioned, become very frugal because they are afraid. I questioned whether he made that accusation because he did not want to face reality.

Screw it! Time to move forward, and if the government does something right let it be a surprise, but don’t count on it.

In the meantime what can we do? First, accept the new game. That not only means individual investors,  but also brokers, money managers and newsletter editors. Gone are the days where we could make a pick and ride the upward tide, see our money grow, and think we were smart. We are going to have to think differently, invest differently, work harder and smarter than we have ever done in the past.

As I work with our research department I finding it very interesting just how many hours they are spend searching the world for companies and investments that will survive and thrive in a long-term economic downturn. They have some of the most sophisticated computer programs money can buy and some of the smartest and most dedicated analysts you’ll ever meet. Even with those terrific tools, they can easily spend a week or more in a particular sector screening possibilities for us to discuss as candidates we might want to recommend to our subscribers.

Once they have a short list of candidates our Money Forever team analyzes them using the following criteria. Some of these issues would never have been considered as recently as 2007, but you need to apply each of them to every stock, bond, ETF, mutual fund, or any other investment for that matter.

  1. Is this a solid company or investment vehicle?  The vast majority of our subscribers are not afforded the opportunity for a do over. Investing in safe companies, or investment vehicles, is a must. This also applies to the picks in the speculative section of our portfolio.
  2. Does it provide good income?  In today’s low yield environment for CD’s and treasuries, every investment is looked at for some yield. While some may be very low, or zero, we may ultimately recommend them because we think the return will justify the investment down the road.
  3. Is there good opportunity for appreciation?  While that might sound like a no-brainer, it must be looked at. In many cases there are good solid companies paying dividends like clockwork; yet their stock prices barely keep up with inflation. There are times we have chosen between two candidates, one paying a slightly smaller dividend but the company is growing, instead of a utility or something similar that may have had a slightly higher dividend.
    In some of the latter cases their stock prices are more interest rate sensitive as opposed to that of a growing company. If interest rates started to rise they could see a quick decline in their stock prices. This has become a greater concern lately: if you have utility stocks or funds in your portfolio then right now is the time to fully re-evaluate them.
  4. Does it protect against inflation?  This is the 800-pound gorilla in the room. When folks ask me if I am one of the inflation folks preaching gloom and doom, I answer them with a question.  Name one fiat currency in history where the government has resorted to paying their bills by massively creating money out of thin air that has not eventually gone through high inflation and collapsed?  I can’t think of one; however I can name Austria, Argentina, Brazil, Hungary, Mexico, Zimbabwe and the Weimar Republic (Germany) off the top of my head that had those experiences. And for the citizens of those countries it was catastrophic.
    While I cannot predict the probability of high or hyperinflation; I do know if it does occur, many seniors and savers will be clobbered if their life savings are all invested in US dollars.
    We have never had a fire in our home yet we buy fire insurance because a fire would wipe out a good bit of our net worth if we did. I look at factoring in the possibility of an investment being an inflation hedge as portfolio insurance. I don’t want my entire portfolio wiped out any more than I do a fire.
  5. Is it easily reversible?  As a person who taught the subject of Problem Solving, I can tell you one of the criteria you use in “decision analysis” is: can it be reversed if you make a mistake?  That is one reason we set stop losses on many of the highly-traded stocks in our portfolio. It’s also one of the reasons that at our age we don’t mess with real estate investing. What about REITs or real estate ETFs? Sure, we’ll consider them, but not actual property, not anymore.
    In 2007 we would have thought little about buying a 6%, five-year CD. Today, I would not recommend buying a 1.3% CD for the same period. It is a loser from the start and could get worse. Also, there’s no way to easily get out of it without suffering major penalties.

The rules are changing. It is a given that when the negotiations are finalized by our government to avert yet another “fiscal cliff” or “debt ceiling” or whatever the financial crisis du jour, we are going to see huge tax increases, not just the rates but others like tax hikes on dividends (again), capital gains and the like. In addition, there are rumors of eliminating the deduction for mortgage interest, which would have a huge effect on the already challenged building industry. And one notable Congressman from New York used the discussion on taxing dividends to question the deductibility of donations to churches, synagogues and other places of worship. Can you imagine that?

The old line, “Sell in May and go away”; forget that. Besides, May was a few months ago.  For the individual investor, tapping the proper resources and remaining vigilance are paramount; whether it’s a broker, money manager, newsletters or research tools. Understand that we are now in a new version of investing; consider it “Investing 2013,” with the release of “Investing 2014” right around the corner. Our program will need many updates to keep up with the current changes in order to survive. 

  • Understand what is going on in today’s investment world.
  • Use your best research and resources that are available to you.
  • Work harder and smarter at managing your nest egg than ever before.
  • Commit the time necessary to protect your life savings.

It’s time to take responsibility for our own finances and move forward. Certainly the stakes are high, and we are all stakeholders; it is our money… and we must ensure that it lasts a lifetime. 

With that in mind, the surest way to make your money last as long as you need it to is to have a steady stream of income, especially when if you’re no longer working. I hit upon this a few times earlier in this article. We have a new monthly income plan that’s taken Casey Research readers by storm. We’ve recently put together a short presentation on how it works, who it’s for, and how to get started. The best part is that you can start right now for free. Click here for more.

Data and Statistics for these countries : Argentina | Austria | Brazil | Germany | Greece | Hungary | Ireland | Mexico | Zimbabwe | All
Gold and Silver Prices for these countries : Argentina | Austria | Brazil | Germany | Greece | Hungary | Ireland | Mexico | Zimbabwe | All
<< Previous article
Rate : Average note :2 (1 vote)
>> Next article
Comments closed
  All Favorites Best Rated  
#3 "Is there good opportunity for appreciation? While that might sound like a no-brainer, it must be looked at. In many cases there are good solid companies paying dividends like clockwork; yet their stock prices barely keep up with inflation. ..."

No brainer indeed. What conceivable train of logic would make you assume that company growth will be the norm in this declining economy? If it keeps up with inflation and pays steady dividends, I would lay my money down.
--------------

"... there are rumors of eliminating the deduction for mortgage interest, ... , one notable Congressman from New York used the discussion on taxing dividends to question the deductibility of donations to churches, synagogues and other places of worship. Can you imagine that?"

I would be joyous. I would dance naked in the rain. Let's look at these sacred cows while pour a bottle of barbecue sauce over them.
Mortgage interest deductions. Why should the nation subsidize a home buyer who, by taking out a mortgage, has proven they really couldn't afford the house? The home-builders? Basically another subsidy by your inference. Don't forget who is receiving these interest monies. And lastly, we are supposed to subsidize interest on real property bought on credit, but not the groceries the average family puts on their credit card near the end of every pay cycle? All subsidies reward poor performance and penalize acceptable or better performance. Do we want to socialize all risks?

Deduction for donations to churches, ... ? Once again you suggest by your snide remark, "Can you imagine that?", that it is imperative for the nation to subsidize your church. You of course offer to do the same for mine. Horse apples. Subsidies are never good except for those who get them. You brought this up, so I'll be forthright. God made the heavens and Earth supposedly (I lack definitive proof), so let God keep the lights on. If the only way a religious entity will obtain the needed revenues to minister to their ministry is by a tax deduction on donations, I have to ask myself, "Is this indicative poor, acceptable or outstanding performance?"
But I'm gonna suggest that we eliminate the entire concept of non-profits from existence. If an entity seeks corporation status, all get treated equally. Yep, churches, private schools, environmental groups and all the various bleeding heart societies for the prevention of herpes on bufo toads (BHSFTPOHOBT). Non-profit corporate status is a forced subsidy crammed down the throats of the masses for the benefit of the few. Shame on you and all the other members of the BHSFTPOHOBT. Let's, just for grins, consider this from a higher plane. If you aren't willing to donate without the deduction, is your heart in the right spot or in your wallet?

All subsidies reward poor performance and penalize acceptable or better performance.
I would NEVER suggest we penalize success and that is what every form of subsidy does. Subsidies beat the mule that labors in the field and hands lumps of sugar to the pretty pony.
Rate :   2  0Rating :   2
EmailPermalink
I'm in Australia and we have no such thing as mortgage interest tax deductions! I mean seriously? Wow.... just WOW.

The US gov. gets its taxpayers to subsidise other people's property investments? So we have low income earners renting who pay higher taxes so that richer homeowners can get deductions on their McMansion payments? Without knowing much else, on the face of it, that seems like a good contender for the biggest load of horse manure I've heard or read about in quite a while. Like Robin Hood's evil twin who steals from the poor and gives to the rich.

In Australia we earn our dough, pay our tax and then worry if we can afford the mortgage with what's left. What's more if we default on that mortgage there is no walking away from it. The banks take every asset you have, including the house of course, and then bankrupt you... end of story.

Rate :   1  0Rating :   1
EmailPermalink
Latest comment posted for this article
I'm in Australia and we have no such thing as mortgage interest tax deductions! I mean seriously? Wow.... just WOW. The US gov. gets its taxpayers to subsidise other people's property investments? So we have low income earners renting who pay higher ta  Read more
dom1971 - 8/2/2013 at 4:37 PM GMT
Rating :  1  0
Top articles
World PM Newsflow
ALL
GOLD
SILVER
PGM & DIAMONDS
OIL & GAS
OTHER METALS