Last week the US House voted overwhelmingly in favor of an anti-Russia resolution
so full of war propaganda that it rivals the rhetoric from chilliest era of
the Cold War. Ironically, much of the bill condemns Russia for doing exactly
what the US government has been doing for years in Syria and Ukraine!
For example, one of the reasons to condemn Russia in the resolution is the
claim that Russia is imposing economic sanctions on Ukraine. But how many rounds
of sanctions has US government imposed on Russia for much of the past year?
I guess sanctions are only bad when used by countries Washington doesn't like.
The resolution condemns Russia for selling weapons to the Assad government
in Syria. But the US has been providing weapons to the rebels in Syria for
several years, with many going to terrorist groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS that
the US is currently bombing!
The resolution condemns what it claims is a Russian invasion of Ukraine (for
which it offers no proof) and Russian violation of Ukrainian sovereignty. But
it was the US, by backing a coup against the democratically elected Yanukovich
government in February, that first violated that country's sovereignty. And
as far as a military presence in Ukraine, it is the US that has openly sent
in special forces and other military advisors to assist the government there.
How many times have top US military and CIA officials visited Kiev to offer
advice and probably a lot more?
The resolution condemns Russia for what it claims are attempts to "illicitly
acquire information" about the US government. But we learned from the Snowden
revelations that the NSA is spying on most rest of the world, including our
allies! How can the US claim the moral authority to condemn such actions in
others?
The resolution attacks Russian state-funded media, claiming that they "distort
public opinion." At the same time the bill demands that the thousands of US
state-funded media outlets step up their programming to that part of the world!
It also seeks "appropriate responses" to Russian media influence in the rest
of the world. That should be understood to mean that US diplomats would exert
pressure on foreign countries to shut down television networks like RT.
The resolution condemns what it claims is Russia's provision of weapons to
the Russian-speaking eastern part of Ukraine, which seeks closer ties with
Russia, while demanding that the US government start providing weapons to its
proxies on the other side.
As I have said, this is one of the worst pieces of legislation I can remember.
And trust me, I have seen some pretty bad bills. It is nothing but war propaganda
and it will likely lead to all sorts of unintended consequences.
Only ten Members - five from each party - opposed this reckless resolution.
Probably most of those who voted in favor did not bother to read the bill.
Others who read it and still voted in favor may have calculated that the bill
would not come up in the Senate. So they could vote yes and please the hawks
in their districts - and more importantly remain in good graces of the hawks
who run foreign policy in Washington - without having to worry about the consequences
if the bill became law.
Whatever the case, we must keep an eye on those Members of Congress who vote
to take us closer to war with Russia. We should thank those ten Members who
were able to resist the war propaganda. The hawks in Washington believe that
last month's election gave them free rein to start more wars. Now more than
ever they must be challenged!
