 Another protester challenged my claim that businesses create jobs by stating that consumers create the jobs by spending money. When I asked him where the consumers got their money, he replied "from their jobs," which actually proved my point. Without jobs, consumers have no purchasing power. And without production, there is nothing to purchase.
----------------------
Be very afraid sir. I believe these kids are not only that smart, they're that opinionated. Why they'll even say money grows on trees if the government will bail THEM out this time instead of the banks. This is sad, because it points past ignorance to a kind of lack regards integrity. And yet where does this arise. You, sir, you did not thus mention Obama by name in this article, which is akin to giving the man a hall pass, here, even though your correct 'blame Washington' requires his substantial repudiation. Is it because he architects both young people's misery and the continuation of your recent (last decade) largess? Irony, indeed, then that a worthless man like POTUS plays both sides, contributing nothing but intellectual overhead (because deliberate error is inherently crass), candy wrapped obfuscation, and so moral waterdown, and all this in and thus contributing to and perpetuating a climate of uncertainty and fear.
Can it be good for the country that the Democrats are fielding a man of no first term accomplishment and are doing so in a bankrupt grab for the purpose but not the content of reelection to the presidency of the United States (for penultimate confirmation of this claim, query WSJ for Purple Strategies article)? Can it be good that the Democrats can't field a candidate suited to the Left (in these trying times)? Where is their surging new Hubert Humphrey, for example? Where is their integrity? And it's then from dearth that one asks where do you think kids get confusion from? This invisible emperor is buck fucking naked, mister. It's cold out too (kids feel this correctly even as they avoid naming the source). Some say, a drop of a time changes this view to 'raw meat thrown to mad dogs.' Others say, top down control is already that far down, and no such response finds the heart of the matter.
It's all bull (more like a minotaur). The depraved (and are they the mainstream media, especially internet portals?) simply add, 'should be alright though as long as the young virgins are sent out to feed the thing in a timely (scheduled) manner.' All agree it's hard on the Greeks though. These are dangerous times. Kids have that part right. It's not enough. Grown ups (and these young men and women are old enough) revile their enemies. They seek the tyrant of their hand me down infirmary, they overthrow this tyranny, or they pay the piper. They don't attack foils when standing on their own deadly ground. They call out the Executor and hold him to task. Boys to men, eh. When this occurs, that will explain them, same as their fathers before them; e.g., pressure from young baby boomers led to mistakes, inherent Nixon, which booted the man. It's about pressure and political consequence. No hall pass for POTUS.
Er, where is Theseus?
 Commented 4565 days ago |
