 What follows is Obama to the UofMichigan commencement 2011. Which part of the paragraph isn't disingenous, out right obfuscation, or simple lie?
'First, American democracy has thrived because we have recognized the need for a government that, while limited [LIMITED!], can still help us adapt to a changing world. On the fourth panel of the Jefferson [JEFFERSON] Memorial is a quote I remember reading to Sasha during our first visit there. It says, "I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions, but...with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance [ADVANCE] also to keep pace with the times."
LIMITED - At that time (but much less than even today), Obama spoke from the largest spending government history has ever known. It spends more, has more debt, and incurs greater deficites than any history has ever seen. As owner, the Central Bank oversees all of these.
JEFFERSON - thanks for the quote, Mr Sutton, sir - I didn't have the full extent of the bastardization of American government and culture that Obama's allusion to Jefferson in this context of LIMITED must likewise announce.
CHANGE - ergo; the only institutional change being advocated here is the one that sets up and funds i into perpetuity an unelected proxy for the government 'for the people' chartered by the constitution. All can see too that to neo Fed it is mandates that are important in Healthcare Reform not the issue itself. But lacking direct violation of the constitution, it can still be twisted and mocked beyond its truer recovery or rather its ability to promote its own continuance through time.
....
Some comments:
1) Since the legal framework Obama mentions must by 'reduction of choice' simply bilk the debtors and milk the 'in debt', EXCLUSIVELY, thus Argentina's economic solution announces the most dangerous economic thought on the planet. This is already playing out in municipalities across America like a leak in a concrete damn. Which state will announce dole first?
2) Which states will pick the dole states up. Imagine, revolution without moral mandate. It lacks Frederick Douglas, because there is no underlying social injustice. It lack the founding fathers, because they paid their way. Where does this bad boy go? And if it doesn't, how do good people live in a land lopsided toward inequity regards their better purposes?
Restated, if Fed cabal & friends thought it had it tied up, that's but a sore mistake. Likely result, something new (perhaps wicked) doth surely this way comes.
Only question, are better people going to ride that bull to whatever prosperity (or reduction of pain) can be managed or will this be mobbed? It can't stay where it's going. The apologist's next move will simply be to eliminate the apology altogether, and on two grounds. 1) they will underestimate the enslaved. 2) the apology itself will no longer be sustainable in that framework legaleze of the winners. The necessary words themselves will have be legislated away.
This then is straight up tyranny, and that will ring a bell, stirring terrible feelings of repugnance toward all that is federal in the deepest hollers of this country. Even yankee doodle will not come to the aid of such a federalization. As all know, especially in the south, when push comes to shove, his dandy is its antithesis. That self removed and then other storied 'yells' will surely be heard again.
Yet the academe has been rendered defunct if I read the academic president's arrogance correctly. But we are not school boys.
3) The point is - If the constitution is trumped past its Aristotlian substantial purpose to announce the new tyranny, so can someone else. There are other, more direct, ways to announce a coup, people. There is in fact a flaw in the overseer's take over agenda. If it is to open season (as in post constitution) (as in post American), then who wants it - under post chartered law, who will call the ball? This Obama wasn't even a fucking cub scout!
What says the military now? They were all out west right before the civil war, everybody knows that. The solutions start at home. Does this United States qua union have a date with the expenditure cutting thinker from Oklahoma and fantastic, rib exposing pain? If so, the Greatest generation has one last lesson to teach. It's twofold. The first says the truth regards surviving a Depression is a cold truth. The second says (in the earned pride of the survivors) We Fuck the Third World here. What has to be the difference between hardship undertaken via policy in America and the third world? The answer, unlike the termite blather of Obama, has to be teleos toward future prosperity.
Rocky Mountain state, Virginia has spoken - what is your quality, sir?  Commented 4553 days ago |
