Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary

Sampling

techniques

 Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or

handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as

limiting the broad meaning of sampling.

 Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

 Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the

Public Report.

 In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

 Conventional b-horizon

 Thresholds used to determine the relevance of results are discussed in detail within the announcement.

Drilling  Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast,  Drilling data quoted in the announcement refers to reverse-circulation

techniques auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard drilling conducted by BMA Gold Ltd in 2005 and is directly quoted

tube, depth of Diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core from:

is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). Environmental & Licensing Professionals Pty Ltd ('ELP'), 2008: Twin Hills Operations Pty Ltd, EPM 12012, Partial Relinquishment Report for 75 Sub-Bocks. QDEX Company Report No. 52303

Drill sample

recovery

 Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.

 Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.

 Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of

fine/coarse material.

 Not known.

Logging  Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically  Not known.

logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.

 Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.

 The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary

Sub-sampling

techniques and sample preparation

 If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.

 If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.

 For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.

 Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.

 Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second- half sampling.

 Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.

 Soil samples were dried, pulverised and screened to

duplicates were employed.

 Techniques not known for BMA Gold Ltd 2005 RC drilling.

Quality of assay  The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory  Aqua regia dissolution was used to extract the assayed element from data and procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. the pulverised sample. This is considered a partial leach method. laboratory tests  For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the  No geophysical data has been used to prepare this report.

parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make  Internal laboratory standards and blanks were used to control the and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, quality of soil assays. Acceptable levels of accuracy and precision etc. were established.

 Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks,  Laboratory techniques and quality control procedures not known for

duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of BMA Gold Ltd 2005 RC drilling.

accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.

Verification of

sampling and assaying

 The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.

 The use of twinned holes.

 Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

 Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

 Assay results were received from the laboratory in digital form and stored directly on the company file server. No adjustments have been made to the reported assay data.

 Not known for BMA Gold Ltd 2005 RC drilling.

Location of data  Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-  All soil samples were located using a hand-held GPS receiver with an

points hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral accuracy of 4m. The grid system used in the field was MGA94, Zone

Resource estimation. 55S. Grid systems used in the figures and tables presented are

 Specification of the grid system used. stated in the captions.

 Quality and adequacy of topographic control.  Not known for BMA Gold Ltd 2005 RC drilling.

Data spacing and

distribution

 Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

 Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral

Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications

applied.

 Whether sample compositing has been applied.

 Soil samples were spaced 100m apart on east-west lines. Sample lines were spaced 200m apart in a north-south direction.

 No Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves are reported in this release.

 Not known for BMA Gold Ltd 2005 RC drilling.

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary

Orientation of  Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of  Not applicable as the type of possible mineralisation at the Big Red

data in relation to possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the prospect is yet unknown.

geological deposit type.  Not known for BMA Gold Ltd 2005 RC drilling.

structure  If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

Sample security

 The measures taken to ensure sample security.

 Samples are stored at a secure location near Zamia's central QLD field office. Zamia employs long-standing relationships with local couriers and laboratories that have a proven history of safe and secure sample handling.

Audits or reviews  The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.  Zamia employs industry standard soil sampling and sample handling procedures.

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary

Mineral

tenement and land tenure

status

 Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint

ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.

 The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

 EPM 17703 - Disney and EPM 15145 - Mazeppa Extended, are held (100%) by Zamia Resources Pty Ltd which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Zamia Metals Ltd.

 No known issues impeding on the security of the Zamia's tenure or ability to operate in the area exist.

Exploration  Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.  The Big Red prospect was discovered by BMA GOLD Ltd in done by other 2004. The history it's discovery and previous exploration is parties summarised within the announcement.



Geology

 Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.

 Big Red is assumed to contain vein-type, low-sulphidation epithermal style gold mineralisation. It is hosted within early Carboniferous granites and volcanics of the Drummond Basin, Sequence 1.

Drill hole  A summary of all information material to the understanding of the  Drilling data quoted in the announcement refers to reverse-

Information exploration results including a tabulation of the following circulation drilling conducted by BMA Gold Ltd in 2005 and is

information for all Material drill holes: directly quoted from:

o easting and northing of the drill hole collar  Environmental & Licensing Professionals Pty Ltd ('ELP'), 2008:

o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea Twin Hills Operations Pty Ltd, EPM 12012, Partial

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary

level in metres) of the drill hole collar Relinquishment Report for 75 Sub-Bocks. QDEX Company

o dip and azimuth of the hole Report No. 52303

o down hole length and interception depth  To gain access to the cited company reports, browse to:

o hole length. o http://www.dnrm.qld.gov.au/map

 If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the ping-data/qdex-reports

information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract

from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.

Data

aggregation methods

 In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high

grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.

 Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.

 The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.

 Soil sampling data was provided as classifies maps. Thresholds chosen to classify soil data are given within the figures and discussed in detail within the announcement body.

 All drilling results were reported as provided in the source data.

No truncations of high or low assay results was undertaken

 No metal equivalent values were reported in this release.

Relationship  These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of  Not known for BMA Gold Ltd 2005 RC drilling. All reported between Exploration Results. intercepts and are assumed to represent down-hole lengths. mineralisation  If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole

widths and angle is known, its nature should be reported.

intercept  If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported,

lengths there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true width not known').

Diagrams

 Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being

reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.

 Refer to figures 1-3 in the report body.

 Maps and sections for BMA Gold Ltd 2005 RC drilling are not available in the public source data.

Balanced  Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not  All available soil assay results have been shown in Figures 1-3.

reporting practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades  All publicly available results for BMA Gold Ltd 2005 RC drilling

and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting have been given in Table 2.

of Exploration Results.

Other

substantive exploration data

 Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of treatment; metallurgical test

results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock

characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.

 To the best knowledge of the author, all available data relevant to the Big Red prospect has been presented/summarised and discussed in the announcement.

 In regards to the assessment of anomalous gold-in-soil values, reference was given to:

 Craver, R.N., and Chenoweth, L.M., 2003: Yandan Gold Deposit, Drummond Basin, QLD. CRC LEME. Available at:

http://crcleme.org.au/RegExpOre/Yandan.pdf

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary

 Other information both on the nearby Twin Hills 309 Mine, the Lone Sister gold deposit and the regional and local geology exist. This information is (1) too large in volume to be meaningfully

summarised in the scope of this release or this table and (2) fully

available to the public in the form of company exploration progress reports though the QDEX report system:

o http://www.dnrm.qld.gov.au/mapping-data/qdex-reports

Further work  The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral  Planned work has been detailed in the release.

extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).

 Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.