|
|
|
|
|
|
The FOMC has crossed the Rubicon: our
analysis suggests that the Federal Open Market Committee is deliberately
ignoring data on both growth and inflation. At best, the FOMC’s
intention might have been to not rock the markets two weeks before the
election. At worst, the FOMC has given up on market transparency in an effort
to actively manage the yield curve (short-term to long-term interest rates):
- On growth, economic data, including the
unemployment report, have clearly come in better than expected since the
most recent FOMC meeting. FOMC practice dictates that progress in
economic growth is acknowledged in the statement. Instead, the
assessment of the economic environment is verbatim. Had the FOMC given
credit to the improved reality, the market might have priced in earlier
tightening. The FOMC chose to ignore reality, possibly afraid of an
unwanted reaction in the bond market.
- On inflation, the FOMC correctly points out
that inflation has recently picked up “somewhat.” However,
it may be misleading to blame the increase on higher energy prices, and
then claim that “longer-term inflation expectations have remained
stable.” Not so, suggests an important inflation indicator
monitored by the Fed and economists alike: 5-year forward, 5-year
inflation expectations broke out when the Fed announced
“QE3”, its third round of quantitative easing where the
emphasis shifted from a focus on inflation to a focus on employment.
This gauge of inflation measures the market’s expectation of
annualized inflation over a five year period starting five years out,
ignoring the near term as it may be influenced by short-term factors:

The chart shows that we have broken out
of a 2 standard deviation band and that the breakout occurred at the time of
the QE3 announcement. In our assessment, the market disagrees with the
FOMC’s assertion that longer-term inflation expectations have remained
stable. At best, the FOMC ignores this development because they also look at
different metrics (keep in mind that the Fed’s quantitative easing programs
manipulate the very rates we are trying to gauge here) or has a different
notion of what it considers longer-term stable inflation expectations. At
worst, however, the FOMC is afraid of admitting to the market that QE3 is
perceived as inflationary.
In our assessment, inflation
expectations have clearly become elevated. Ignoring reality by ignoring
growth and inflation may not be helpful to the long-term credibility of the
Fed. Fed credibility is important, as monetary policy becomes much more
expensive when words alone don’t move markets anymore.
|
|
|
|
|