Chart usGOLD   Chart usSILVER  
 
Food for thought
Don't believe them, don't fear them, don't ask anything of them
Alexander Solzhenitsyn  
Search for :
LATEST NEWS  :
MINING STOCKS  :
Subscribe
Write Us
Add to Google
Search on Ebay :
PRECIOUS METALS (US $)
Gold 1369.370.67
Silver 21.710.01
Platinum 1432.00-4.00
Palladium 705.30-4.50
WORLD MARKETS
DOWJONES 15318132
NASDAQ 348230
NIKKEI 13007-26
ASX 4795-10
CAC 40 3861-3
DAX 823014
HUI 255-7
XAU 1030
CURRENCIES (€)
AUS $ 1.4171
CAN $ 1.3703
US $ 1.3394
GBP (£) 0.8569
Sw Fr 1.2325
YEN 127.8840
CURRENCIES ($)
AUS $ 1.0580
CAN $ 1.0231
Euro 0.7467
GBP (£) 0.6398
Sw Fr 0.9201
YEN 95.4710
RATIOS & INDEXES
Gold / Silver63.08
Gold / Oil13.91
Dowjones / Gold11.19
COMMODITIES
Copper 3.160.00
WTI Oil 98.480.04
Nat. Gas 3.910.01
Market Indices
Metal Prices
RSS
Precious Metals
Graph Generator
Statistics by Country
Statistics by Metals
Advertise on 24hGold
Projects on Google Earth
In the same category 
FOMC In Denial
Published : October 27th, 2012
409 words - Reading time : 1 - 1 minutes
( 2 votes, 4.5/5 ) , 1 commentary Print article
 
    Comments    
Tweet

 

 

 

 

The FOMC has crossed the Rubicon: our analysis suggests that the Federal Open Market Committee is deliberately ignoring data on both growth and inflation. At best, the FOMC’s intention might have been to not rock the markets two weeks before the election. At worst, the FOMC has given up on market transparency in an effort to actively manage the yield curve (short-term to long-term interest rates):

 

  • On growth, economic data, including the unemployment report, have clearly come in better than expected since the most recent FOMC meeting. FOMC practice dictates that progress in economic growth is acknowledged in the statement. Instead, the assessment of the economic environment is verbatim. Had the FOMC given credit to the improved reality, the market might have priced in earlier tightening. The FOMC chose to ignore reality, possibly afraid of an unwanted reaction in the bond market.

 

  • On inflation, the FOMC correctly points out that inflation has recently picked up “somewhat.” However, it may be misleading to blame the increase on higher energy prices, and then claim that “longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.” Not so, suggests an important inflation indicator monitored by the Fed and economists alike: 5-year forward, 5-year inflation expectations broke out when the Fed announced “QE3”, its third round of quantitative easing where the emphasis shifted from a focus on inflation to a focus on employment. This gauge of inflation measures the market’s expectation of annualized inflation over a five year period starting five years out, ignoring the near term as it may be influenced by short-term factors:

 


 

The chart shows that we have broken out of a 2 standard deviation band and that the breakout occurred at the time of the QE3 announcement. In our assessment, the market disagrees with the FOMC’s assertion that longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable. At best, the FOMC ignores this development because they also look at different metrics (keep in mind that the Fed’s quantitative easing programs manipulate the very rates we are trying to gauge here) or has a different notion of what it considers longer-term stable inflation expectations. At worst, however, the FOMC is afraid of admitting to the market that QE3 is perceived as inflationary.

 

In our assessment, inflation expectations have clearly become elevated. Ignoring reality by ignoring growth and inflation may not be helpful to the long-term credibility of the Fed. Fed credibility is important, as monetary policy becomes much more expensive when words alone don’t move markets anymore.

 

 

 

 

Tweet
Rate :Average note :4.5 (2 votes)View Top rated
Previous article by
Axel Merk
All articles by
Axel Merk
Next article by
Axel Merk
Receive by mail the latest articles by this author  
Latest comment posted for this article
I would say that fed credibility has been dead for some time. I hardly think that is much of a concern to them at this point. We don't publish the M-3 numbers anymore because it's too expensive? The fed credibility ship has sailed and been long gone si  Read more
granttc - 10/28/2012 at 10:50 PM GMT
Rating :  1  0
TOP ARTICLES
MOST READ
TOP RATED
MOST COMMENTED
Editor's picks
RSS feed24hGold Mobile
Gold Data CenterGold & Silver Converter
Gold coins on eBaySilver coins on eBay
Technical AnalysisFundamental Analysis

Axel Merk

Axel Merk is the President and CIO of Merk Investments, manager of the Merk Funds. An authority on currencies, he is a pioneer in the use of strategic currency investing to seek diversification. Axel Merk is a sought after speaker and author on topics ranging from the economy, gold and currencies to sustainable wealth and personal finance, as well as a regular guest and contributor to the business media around the world. Mr. Merk manages the Merk Hard and Asian Currency Funds and co-manages the Merk Absolute Return Currency Fund and the Merk Currency Enhanced U.S. Equity Fund. He holds a B.A. in Economics (magna cum laude) and a M.Sc. In Computer Science from Brown University.
Axel Merk ArchiveWebsiteSubscribe to his services
Most recent articles by Axel Merk
6/18/2013
6/11/2013
6/4/2013
5/22/2013
5/9/2013
All Articles
Comment this article
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
 
Sign in
User : Password : Login
Sign In Forgot password?
 
 
       
I would say that fed credibility has been dead for some time. I hardly think that is much of a concern to them at this point. We don't publish the M-3 numbers anymore because it's too expensive? The fed credibility ship has sailed and been long gone since 2006.
Rate :   1  0Rating :   1
Permalink
Receive 24hGold's Daily Market Briefing in your inbox. Go here to subscribe or unsubscribe.
Disclaimer