Any American influence left in Iraq should focus on rebuilding the
credibility of national institutions.
– Editorial, The New York Times
Gosh, isn’t that what we spent eight years, 4,500 lives, and $1.7 trillion
doing? And how did that work out? The Iraq war is just like the US financial
system. The people in charge can’t imagine writing off their losses. Which,
from the policy standpoint, leaves the USA pounding sand down so many rat
holes that there may be no ground left to stand on anywhere. We’ll be lucky
if our national life doesn’t soon resemble The Revenge of the Mole People.
The arc of this story points to at least one likely conclusion: the dreadful
day that ISIS (shorthand for whatever they call themselves) overruns the US
Green Zone in Baghdad. Won’t that be a nauseating spectacle? Perhaps just in
time for the 2014 US elections. And what do you suppose the policy meeting
will be like in the White House war room the day after?
Will anyone argue that the USA just take a break from further operations
in the entire Middle East / North Africa region? My recommendation would be
to stand back, do nothing, and see what happens — since everything we’ve done
so far just leaves things and lives shattered. Let’s even say that ISIS ends
up consolidating power in Iraq, Syria, and some other places. The whole
region will get a very colorful demonstration of what it is like to live
under an 11th century style psychopathic despotism, and then the
people left after the orgy of beheading and crucifixion can decide if they
like it. The experience might be clarifying.
In any case, what we’re witnessing in the Middle East — apparently
unbeknownst to the newspapers and the cable news orgs — is what happens in a
case of extreme population overshoot: chaos, murder, economic collapse. The
human population in this desolate corner of the world has expanded on the
artificial nutriment of oil profits, which have allowed governments to keep
feeding their people, and maintaining an artificial middle class to work in
meaningless bureaucratic offices where, at best, they do nothing and, at
worst, hassle their fellow citizens for bribes and payoffs.
There is not a nation on earth that is preparing intelligently for the end
of oil — and by that I mean 1) the end of cheap, affordable oil, and
2) the permanent destabilization of existing oil supply lines. Both of these
conditions should be visible now in the evolving geopolitical dynamic, but
nobody is paying attention, for instance, in the hubbub over Ukraine. That
feckless, unfortunate, and tragic would-be nation, prompted by EU and US
puppeteers, just replied to the latest trade sanction salvo from Russia by
declaring it would block the delivery of Russian gas to Europe through
pipelines on its territory. I hope everybody west of Dnepropetrovsk is
getting ready to burn the furniture come November. But that just shows how
completely irrational the situation has become… and I stray from my point.
Which is that in the worst case that ISIS succeeds in establishing a
sprawling caliphate, they will never be able to govern it successfully, only
preside over an awesome episode of bloodletting and social collapse. This is
especially true in what is now called Saudi Arabia, with its sclerotic ruling
elite clinging to power. If and when the ISIS maniacs come rolling in on a
cavalcade of You-Tube beheading videos, what are the chances that the
technicians running the oil infrastructure there will stick around on the
job? And could ISIS run all that machinery themselves? I wouldn’t count on
it. And I wouldn’t count on global oil supply lines continuing to function in
the way the world requires them to. If you’re looking for the near-future
spark of World War Three, start there.
By the way, the US is no less idiotic than Ukraine. We’ve sold ourselves
the story that shale oil will insulate us from all the woes and conflicts
breaking out elsewhere in the world over the dissolving oil economy paradigm.
The shale oil story is false. By my reckoning we have about a year left of
the drive-to-Walmart-economy before the public broadly gets what trouble
we’re in. The amazing thing is that the public might get to that realization
even before its political leadership does. That dynamic leads straight to the
previously unthinkable (not for 150 years, anyway) breakup of the United
States.
