Ron Paul vs. USA Today on Crimea; Reflections on "High Costs" of USA Today Proposal

IMG Auteur
Published : March 19th, 2014
836 words - Reading time : 2 - 3 minutes
( 7 votes, 5/5 ) , 2 commentaries
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
Our Newsletter...
Category : Opinions and Analysis

A pair of articles on USA Today, one by Ron Paul, the other the view of the editorial board of USA Today, proves that even when the facts are laid out, hypocrites remain hypocrites.

Ron Paul's View

Crimea Secedes. So What?

Residents of Crimea voted over the weekend on whether they would remain an autonomous region of Ukraine or join the Russian Federation. In so doing, they joined a number of countries and regions — including recently Scotland, Catalonia and Venice — that are seeking to secede from what they view as unresponsive or oppressive governments.

These latter three are proceeding without much notice, while the overwhelming Crimea vote to secede from Ukraine has incensed U.S. and European Union officials, and has led NATO closer to conflict with Russia than since the height of the Cold War.

What's the big deal? Opponents of the Crimea vote like to point to the illegality of the referendum. But self-determination is a centerpiece of international law. Article I of the United Nations Charter points out clearly that the purpose of the U.N. is to "develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples."

Why does the U.S. care which flag will be hoisted on a small piece of land thousands of miles away?

Critics point to the Russian "occupation" of Crimea as evidence that no fair vote could have taken place. Where were these people when an election held in an Iraq occupied by U.S. troops was called a "triumph of democracy"?

Perhaps the U.S. officials who supported the unconstitutional overthrow of Ukraine's government should refocus their energies on learning our own Constitution, which does not allow the U.S. government to overthrow governments overseas or send a billion dollars to bail out Ukraine and its international creditors. ...
USA Today Editorial Board View

Show Putin the High Cost of Conquest
When President Vladimir Putin addresses Russia's parliament Tuesday, he will almost certainly announce, just two weeks after a remarkably bloodless invasion and just two days after Sunday's secession vote, that Crimea is rejoining Russia.

Most Russians and Crimeans, bursting with patriotic pride, will cheer, egged on by Putin's propaganda machine, which had crushed dissenting voices. The mild sanctions imposed by the Obama administration and Europe, to protest Russia's seizure of Crimea from Ukraine, will be dismissed or ignored.

So far, the Obama administration, with no military option, has responded appropriately: rallying allies, preparing an escalating series of economic sanctions and pressing Putin diplomatically. But threats need teeth to be credible, and Putin will relent only if he believes that his actions will have devastating consequences.

The immediate step, freezing assets of a few officials close to Putin, is a minor warning shot. The firepower can by multiplied many times by imposing embargoes, cutting Russia off from the international banking system or other measures — if Europe is willing to bear the cost. ...
Reflections on "High Costs"

Notice how the USA Today editorial board want to show Putin the "high cost" when in actuality it would be Europe that must be willing to bear the cost, not the US. Russia can and would shut off natural gas delivery to Europe if the USA Today got its way.

And speaking of "high cost of conquest" the USA today ought to mention we wasted trillions of dollars in Iraq and Afghanistan  with virtually nothing to show for it but a mountain of debt and well-warranted global hatred of US war-mongering.

The US learned nothing from Vietnam, nothing from Iraq, and nothing from Afghanistan.

Warmongers like McCain think the solution to this mess is sanctions coupled with sending missiles to the Czech Republic. 

History Lesson

The USA Today also ignores history. Crimea was given to the Ukraine by Nikita Khrushchev in 1954. Was that gift constitutional? Putin makes a very reasonable claim that it wasn't.

As long as we are discussing history, inquiring minds just may be interested in European Border Changes Over Last 1000 Years.

Link if video does not play: European Border Changes over Last 1000 Years

US Hypocrisy

The US is quite willing to have a vote, provided the vote is going the way the US wants.

And speaking of votes, where were the US hypocrites when technocrat after technocrat leader was installed in Italy and Greece undoubtedly against the constitution of those countries, without a vote.

The US bombed into submission Iraq and Afghanistan halfway around the globe but protests when Russia protects its clear military interests on its own border, a border that was given away (most likely unconstitutionally).

Now we protest the vote was not fair and was against Ukraine's constitution. Please spare me the sap.

I am tired of US warmongers and hypocrites who think "might makes right" but only when it is the US leading the aggression.

1000 years of history as well as an ounce of common sense says this is not our battle. We should stay out of it.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
Data and Statistics for these countries : Afghanistan | Czech Republic | Greece | Iraq | Italy | Russia | Ukraine | Vietnam | All
Gold and Silver Prices for these countries : Afghanistan | Czech Republic | Greece | Iraq | Italy | Russia | Ukraine | Vietnam | All
<< Previous article
Rate : Average note :5 (7 votes)
>> Next article
IMG Auteur
Mish 13 abonnés
Mike Shedlock / Mish is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. He writes a global economics blog which has commentary 5-7 times a week. He also writes for the Daily Reckoning, Whiskey & Gunpowder, and has over 80 magazine and book cover credits. Visit
WebsiteSubscribe to his services
Comments closed
  All Favorites Best Rated  
I couldn't agree more. I am sick and tired of the hypocrisy, and US government meddling in and bullying countries all around the world. And to top it off, our prime- minister here in Canada is a spineless suck-up to the POTUS and the rest of the corrupt Western European governments. I haven't heard yet, but likely he will parrot the exact same thing: "We do not recognize the referendum in the Ukraine as legitimate" crap that his crony corporatist counterparts in US and Europe have said. Speak for yourself, Harper! How they can make these statements with a straight face, or look anyone in the eye, or sleep at night, is beyond me. And yet, the government of the Ukraine was taken over undemocratically, and they don't make a peep. in fact, they support it and there is evidence they likely instigated it!

Back to our esteemed Prime Minister, he recently was in Israel, getting the royal treatment while turning a blind eye to all the human rights violations of the Israeli government, and the hypocrisy there that says they can have nukes and bomb the Palestinians and take their land, and sanction Iran, and the rest of the world should support them, because they are gods chosen ones according to some old book. The Jews were treated horribly in the past, it sickens me and I feel for them, but does that justify their government bullying others? Please note that whenever I refer to these despotic countries, I am only accusing the governments of those countries. I hold all citizens in equal regard, American, European, Jew, Muslim, etc...I believe the average person in each of these countries or religions, is just trying to live a decent life, and does not mean harm to anyone. And I do not feel that they are directly responsible for their government's actions, especially when governments have so much power. However, I do feel that we as citizens, have a right and responsibility to speak up and speak out when we do not agree with our governments, especially when they are so obviously trampling our freedoms and the freedoms of others. After all, the governments are supposed to represent and respond to the will of the people. When we are afraid to speak out, we have lost all our freedom, and it is feeling very close to that now.
Rate :   4  0Rating :   4
Your forgetting that it's not only Harper who has deiced to suck up to the US. Every stinking prime minister we've had has done the same thing, no matter what party they belonged to. There seems to be some unwritten law in Ottawa that we have to back the blunders our neighbors to the south commit.
Rate :   2  2Rating :   0
Latest comment posted for this article
Your forgetting that it's not only Harper who has deiced to suck up to the US. Every stinking prime minister we've had has done the same thing, no matter what party they belonged to. There seems to be some unwritten law in Ottawa that we have to back the  Read more
Hart - 3/24/2014 at 1:52 AM GMT
Rating :  2  2
Top articles
World PM Newsflow