In defending their long held short positions, the Comex
Banks have now issued enough new contracts to drive total open interest back
to levels not seen since 2011. Will they be successful in capping price or
are they about to get a religious experience? We're about to find out.
Let's start with the basics so that we're all on the same
page....
The Bullion Banks act as de facto "market
makers" on the Comex. In doing so, they have the ability to create new
futures contracts for trading across the board. In a sense, there are
three possible transactions:
- A Bank issues a new contract. A willing
Spec buyer (long) takes one side and the Bank (short) takes the other.
Net result = 1 new contract and total open interest increases by that
one contract.
- A Bank issues a new contract. A willing
Spec seller (short) takes one side and the Bank (long) takes the other.
Net result = 1 new contract and total open interest increases by that
one contract.
- A buyer and a seller meet ( the bid and
ask/offer) and they exchange an existing contract at the
current price. Net result = No change in total open interest as no new
futures contract has been created.
On The Comex, where The Banks seek to manage and control
the paper price, since time immemorial The Banks have been NET short and the
Specs have been NET long the paper contracts. The degree to which The Banks
are short and the Specs are long fluctuates daily and, once per week, the
CFTC surveys all of the market participants to get their summary positions.
This data is compiled and released every Friday as the "Commitment of
Traders" report.
OK...so far so good?
Now here's where the fraud begins. The Banks, acting in
their capacity as "market makers", have a virtually unlimited power
to create from thin air as many Comex paper derivative contracts as they'd
like. In doing so, The Banks take the risk of being short while the Specs, in
taking the other side of the trade, take the risk of being long. The
fraudulent game that The Banks play is in never being forced to deliver upon
of their paper obligations. The Specs simply seek gold "exposure"
so they buy the paper derivative contract and The Banks sell it to them. If
prices go up, the Specs make fiat and The Banks lose fiat. If prices go down,
The Banks make fiat and the Specs lose fiat.
Again, though, very little physical
gold is ever delivered. Thus, the only price "discovered" is the
price of the derivative itself, not the actual physical metal.
Having the unlimited ability to create new contract
supply gives The Banks the nearly unlimited ability to control price, too. How?
Think of it this way:
- You call up your broker at Merrill
Lynch and tell him to buy you 200 shares of Coca-Cola. A market order is
submitted and someone, somewhere sells their existing 200 shares of
Coca-Cola to you. The supply of Coca-Cola shares is finite on any given
day so price must find an equilibrium where buyers and sellers meet.
However, as we laid out at the beginning of this post,
that's NOT how it works on The Comex. Oh sure, most of the
volume each day is an exchange of existing contracts. However, volume is also
supplied by The Banks simply creating new contracts to sell
to buyers. Go back to the bullet point above. How fair and legal would it be
if your broker, instead of finding a seller of existing Coca-Cola shares,
decided instead to simply create some new shares out of the blue and sell
them to you? You'd have your long exposure to Coke and your broker would take
the risk of being short Coke.
Not only would this be patently illegal and fraudulent,
think of the impact this would have on the price of the Coca-Cola shares.
Since willing sellers wouldn't need to be found for new buyers, price
wouldn't need to rise in order to entice sellers to sell. Your broker would
simply take the risk of being short Coca-Cola, all with the hope and the plan
of seeing you eventually give up and sell your Coca-Cola shares back to them,
likely at a lower price and at a profit for your broker.
And, again, this is EXACTLY how The Comex operates.
Without having to supply any additional physical gold or
other collateral, The Banks simply create new gold derivative contracts
whenever demand for contracts exceeds available supply. This has the obvious
effect of dampening price moves as "price" isn't forced to find a
true equilibrium between buyers and sellers. And this has played out for all
to see here in 2016.
We've written about this before, most recently two weeks
ago: http://www.tfmetalsreport.com/blog/7576/fun-comex-open-interest However, open interest has expanded so dramatically in the two
weeks since, it seemed we had to write about this again today.
Again, what is happening here is an overt attempt to
contain and control price. If the total volume of available open interest on
the Comex was anchored or tethered to a fixed amount of collateral, then the
supply of derivative contracts would be relatively stable like the daily
supply of available Coca-Cola shares. Instead, The Banks simply create new
supply nearly every day and, in doing so, restrict and manage the daily
movements of "price". It looks like this:
DATE
|
PRICE
|
TOTAL OPEN INTEREST
|
TOTAL "COMMERCIAL"
GROSS SHORT POSITION
|
1/26/16
|
$1121
|
385,350
|
175,176 contracts or 545 metric tonnes
of paper gold
|
2/16/16
|
$1209
|
428,912
|
259,784 contracts or 808 mts of paper
gold
|
3/8/16
|
$1264
|
499,110
|
311,865 contracts or 971 mts of paper
gold
|
4/12/16
|
$1261
|
504,523
|
353,968 contracts or 1,101 mts of paper
gold
|
4/26/16
|
$1243
|
497,994
|
356,553 contracts or 1,109 mts of paper
gold
|
And now here's where it gets particularly egregious. Over
the past week, the price of "gold" has risen by $49 to Tuesday's
close of $1292. While that's still a significant move of nearly 4%, how
much higher would the price of gold had risen if the total open
interest, which has already been inflated by over 25% over the past 90 days,
wasn't allowed to rise farther still? And, as of yesterday (Tuesday)
it looks like this:
5/3/16
|
$1292
|
565,774
|
410,000 contracts at a minimum or 1,275
mts of paper gold
|
I'm going to stop here to let that sink in for a
while....
So, to control/manage price and to keep the rally
contained at just $170 or 15% in the past 100 days, The
Comex Banks have issued a whopping 180,424 new paper derivative contracts,
growing the total Comex open interest by 47%! Not only that,
but 180,424 new contracts is the paper equivalent of over 18,000,000 ounces
of "gold", created from whole cloth and sold to the Speculators,
all without additional capital or physical collateral requirements.
As noted above, the GROSS short position of The Comex
Banks has more than doubled from 545 metric tonnes to as much as 1,100 metric
tonnes today. This means that if The Banks were ever forced to make good on
these paper short obligations, they'd have to physically deliver more than
the entire stated holdings of Switzerland! Additionally, the entire Comex
vaulting system only purports to hold 7,300,000 ounces of gold. So when The
Banks are short 41,000,000 ounces of gold, aren't they fraudulently selling
something that they don't own? (And please don't give me that line of garbage
about producers hedging and selling forward. That scheme ended years ago.)
At the end of the day, you must understand the
implications. The Banks are doing everything in their power to manage
price...and why wouldn't they?!? When you're short 40,000,000 ounces of gold,
every $10 move "costs" you $400,000,000. A $100 up move from here
generates paper losses of $4,000,000,000 so they are fighting tooth-and-nail
to keep that from happening by doubling down and putting "bad money
after good" in the same way that a blackjack player thinks he will
eventually win a hand and get all of his lost money back.
The Banks hope that eventually they can spark a Spec
selloff. Once the Specs head for the exits, this Spec selling will be
utilized by The Banks. They'll take the other side of the trade and buy their
shorts back. The Banks will then "retire" those contracts and total
open interest will decline. The Banks will hope to engender enough Spec
selling to allow them to cover (buy back) up to 100,000 of their ill-gotten
shorts and drop total open interest back to the 450,000 level. The question
is: Will they be successful? While this has been a foolproof business plan
since 2013, it hasn't worked thus far in 2016 as Spec fiat has continually
flowed into the paper gold derivative market.
So watch price and open interest very closely in the days
and weeks ahead. The increasingly-desperate Banks are apt to openly raid
price in their efforts to spur some Spec selling. The upcoming jobs report of
this Friday being an obvious starting point.
In the end, however, I'll leave you with one, final
thought. Now that the Chinese have pricing power in gold, they quite
literally have the ability to completely screw and hammer the Comex and
London Banks. They can raise the Shanghai Fix and enable the immediate
arbitrage. They could use this tool to drain whatever gold is left and
utterly crush every big, western Bank.
But the time is nigh. If The Banks successfully rig the
price back down, squeeze out all the Spec longs and close back up 150,000
contracts of OI, The Chinese will miss their opportunity. So, will they take
it? Maybe. Maybe not. Maybe they're not yet ready. We'll just have to wait
and see.
Again, watch price and open interest very closely in the
days ahead. It's crunch time and things are going to get increasingly
volatile. Prepare accordingly.

|
Our Ask The Expert interviewer Craig Hemke began his
career in financial services in 1990 but retired in 2008 to focus on family
and entrepreneurial opportunities. Since 2010, he has been the editor and
publisher of the TF Metals Report found at TFMetalsReport.com, an online community for precious metal investors.
|
The author is not affiliated with, endorsed or sponsored
by Sprott Money Ltd. The views and opinions expressed in this material are
those of the author or guest speaker, are subject to change and may not
necessarily reflect the opinions of Sprott Money Ltd. Sprott Money does not
guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness and reliability of the
information or any results from its use.