The Jeffersonian Secessionist Tradition

IMG Auteur
lewRockwell
From the Archives : Originally published July 05th, 2014
1174 words - Reading time : 2 - 4 minutes
( 16 votes, 2.7/5 ) , 2 commentaries
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
0
Send
2
comment
Our Newsletter...
Category : History of Gold

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.  It is its natural manure.”

–Letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Stephens Smith, Nov 13, 1787

Thomas Jefferson, the author of America’s July 4, 1776 Declaration of Secession from the British empire, was a lifelong advocate of both the voluntary union of the free, independent, and sovereign states, and of the right of secession.  “If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union or to change its republican form,” he said in his first inaugural address in 1801, “let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left to combat it.”

In a January 29, 1804 letter to Dr. Joseph priestly, who had ask Jefferson his opinion of the New England secession movement that was gaining momentum, he wrote:  “Whether we remain in one confederacy, or form into Atlantic and Mississippi confederacies, believe not very important to the happiness of either part.  Those of the western confederacy will be as much our children & descendants as those of the eastern . . . and did I now foresee a separation at some future day,, yet should feel the duty & the desire to promote the western interests as zealously as the eastern, doing all the good for both portions of our future family . . .”  Jefferson offered the same opinion to John C. Breckenridge on August 12 1803 when New Englanders were threatening secession after the Louisiana purchase.  If there were a “separation,” he wrote, “God bless them both & keep them in the union if it be for their good, but separate them, if it be better.”

Everyone understood that the union of the states was voluntary and that, as Virginia, Rhode Island, and New York stated in their constitutional ratification documents, each state had a right to withdraw from the union at some future date if that union became harmful to its interests.  So when New Englanders began plotting secession barely twenty years after the end of the American Revolution, their leader, Massachusetts Senator Timothy Pickering (who was also George Washington’s secretary of war and secretary of state) stated that “the principles of our Revolution point to the remedy – a separation.  That this can be accomplished without spilling one drop of blood, I have little doubt” (In Henry Adams, editor, Documents Relating to New-England Federalism, 1800-1815, p. 338).  The New England plot to secede from the union culminated in the Hartford Secession Convention of 1814, where they ultimately decided to remain in the union and to try to dominate it politically instead.  (They of course succeeded beyond their wildest dreams, beginning in April of 1865 up to the present day).

John Quincy Adams, the quintessential New England Yankee, echoed these Jeffersonian sentiments in an 1839 speech in which he said that if different states or groups of states came into irrepressible conflict, then that “will be the time for reverting to the precedents which occurred at the formation and adoption of the Constitution, to form again a more perfect union by dissolving that which could no longer bind, and to leave the separated parts to be reunited by the law of political gravitation . . .” (John Quincy Adams, The Jubilee of the Constitution, 1939, pp. 66-69).

There is a long history of American newspapers endorsing the Jeffersonian secessionist tradition.  The following are just a few examples.

The Bangor, Maine Daily Union once editorialized that the union of Maine with the other states “rests and depends for its continuance on the free consent and will of the sovereign people of each.  When that consent and will is withdrawn on either part, their Union is gone, and no power exterior to the withdrawing [state] can ever restore it.”  Moreover, a state can never be a true equal member of the American union if forced into it by military aggression, the Maine editorialists wrote.

“A war . . . is a thousand times worse evil than the loss of a State, or a dozen States” the Indianapolis Daily Journal once wrote.  “The very freedom claimed by every individual citizen, precludes the idea of compulsory association, as individuals, as communities, or as States,” wrote the Kenosha, Wisconsin Democrat.  “The very germ of liberty is the right of forming our own governments, enacting our own laws, and choosing or own political associates . . . .  The right of secession inheres to the people of every sovereign state.”

Using violence to force any state to remain in the union, once said the New York Journal of Commerce, would “change our government from a voluntary one, in which the people are sovereigns, to a despotism” where one part of the people are “slaves.”  The Washington (D.C.) Constitution concurred, calling a coerced union held together at gunpoint (like the Soviet Union, for instance) “the extreme of wickedness and the acme of folly.”

“The great principle embodied by Jefferson in the Declaration of American Independence, that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed,” the New York Daily Tribune once wrote, “is sound and just,” so that if any state wanted to secede peacefully from the union, it has “a clear moral right to do so.”

A union maintained by military force, Soviet style, would be “mad and Quixotic” as well as “tyrannical and unjust” and “worse than a mockery,” editorialized the Trenton (N.J.) True American.  Echoing Jefferson’s letter to John C. Breckenridge, the Cincinnati Daily Commercial once editorialized that “there is room for several flourishing nations on this continent; and the sun will shine brightly and the rivers run as clear” if one or more states were to peacefully secede.

All of these Northern state editorials were published in the first three months of 1861 and are published in Howard Cecil Perkins, editor, Northern Editorials on Secession (Gloucester, Mass.: 1964).  They illustrate how the truths penned by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence – that the states were considered to be free, independent, and sovereign in the same sense that England and France were; that the union was voluntary; that using invasion, bloodshed, and mass murder to force a state into the union would be an abomination and a universal moral outrage; and that a free society is required to revere freedom of association – were still alive and well until April of 1865 when the Lincoln regime invented and adopted the novel new theory that: 1) the states were never sovereign; 2) the union was not voluntary; and 3) the federal government had the “right” to prove that propositions 1 and 2 are right by means murdering hundreds of thousands of fellow citizens by waging total war on the entire civilian population of the Southern states, bombing and burning its cities and towns into a smoldering ruin, and calling it all “the glory of the coming of the Lord.”

Happy Fourth of July!

The Best of Thomas DiLorenzo

Data and Statistics for these countries : France | All
Gold and Silver Prices for these countries : France | All
<< Previous article
Rate : Average note :2.7 (16 votes)
>> Next article
Thomas DiLorenzo is professor of economics at Loyola College, Maryland, and a senior fellow at the Ludwig von Mises Institute. He is the author or co-author of ten books, on subjects such as antitrust, group-interest politics, and interventionism generally
Comment this article
>Follow all commentairies
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
Log in or Sign up
  All Favorites Best Rated  

Your article supports the notion that the south had every justification to leave the union because of the unfair tariff war triggered by the North that choked off southern exports of cotton to England.

Few realize how wrong Lincoln was to force the South to remain in the union and introduce fiat greenbacks. Where was the supreme court during all these unconstitutional edicts? Lincoln was an unconstitutional tyrant that should have been impeached and jailed and the tariffs that started all this conflict should have been cancelled.

Few realize the power of the globalists even at that time to foment conflict and control us behind the scenes using their hidden agent Lincoln - who was far from a hero and more of a traitorous disaster.

Rate :   1  1Rating :   0
EmailPermalink
sure tommy. but the people of the south were slaves and white trash mostly. white trash because the plantation-crats and there few buddies had all the good stuff wrapped up and un-available to the majority of the population. and we all know about the slaves. so ,unlike in new england where town meetings were popular and many citizens were working hard to abolish the abombination of slavery; the south was run by a band of aligned punks who honestly thought that they too enjoyed the divine right of kings, because they had the money and the power. so if it comes right down to it and your going to fight for freedom, for gods sakes fight for Freedom.
Rate :   1  1Rating :   0
EmailPermalink
Latest comment posted for this article
Your article supports the notion that the south had every justification to leave the union because of the unfair tariff war triggered by the North that choked off southern exports of cotton to England. Few realize how wrong Lincoln was to force the Sou  Read more
sam_site - 7/28/2016 at 9:44 AM GMT
Rating :  1  1
Top articles
Latest Comments
Silver Price Forecast 2019/2018: Silver Bull Market Is Almost Here
14 JulS W.
How can you sell at $60 if you've sold it all $30 What is your stop price $ It will not surprise me to see it go to $10 or $11 because...
The End of Quantitative Easing and Gold
09 JulRocco
Once the fed is done with the tightening cycle, what will happen from there? Will they just keep the fed rate at around 2.9% or will they keep rais...
Silver Price Forecast 2019/2018: Silver Bull Market Is Almost Here
09 JulRocco
100% for a safe profit investment. If it goes above $60 for sure i'm going out and selling ALL my silver to http://nycbullion.com ... I would even ...
Why Is Healthcare So Complex and Over-Priced in America?
03 JulRocco
Insurance companies keep raising the amount of the discount they receive from hospital bills and etc. Therefore hospitals and doctors keep raising ...
Silver Price Forecast 2019/2018: Silver Bull Market Is Almost Here
05 Julprljr
Good ??'s I was wondering the same things.
Silver Price Forecast 2019/2018: Silver Bull Market Is Almost Here
04 JulS W.
If the market ? goes bearish or bullish you have to ask yourself the question "why did I buy silver in the first place?" Do you have a stop? What i...
Silver Price Forecast 2019/2018: Silver Bull Market Is Almost Here
02 JulRocco
Great article, I think/hope silver will continue the bull!! I've invested in too much silver for it to start being a bearish market!
Why Is Healthcare So Complex and Over-Priced in America?
02 Julprljr
The AMA makes sure that their members always profit from their customers. Why do doctors need a union? Go back to before the AMA was created t...
Most commented articlesFavoritesMore...
World PM Newsflow
ALL
GOLD
SILVER
PGM & DIAMONDS
OIL & GAS
OTHER METALS