What
the "risk free" interest rate should be and what it actually is
The
risk-free interest rate (the interest rate where the risk of direct default
is close to zero) should reflect the economy-wide time preference, meaning
that it should reflect the general desire to save (postpone consumption)
relative to the general desire to consume. For example, a low interest rate
would ideally indicate that there was a relatively high level of savings and
that consumption was likely to be higher in the future than it is in the
present. As such, it would act as a valid signal for businessmen to embark on
long-term, capital-intensive projects in order to take advantage of both the
current low cost of credit and the expected future rise in consumption.
Unfortunately,
though, under the current system the interest rate has almost nothing to do
with the economy-wide time preference. As a result: investing mistakes are
made on a grand scale, the economy lurches between boom and bust in
oscillations of ever-increasing amplitude, and real economic progress is
slowed or stopped altogether. All of this was well understood and explained
by Ludwig von Mises a century ago, but most of today's economists are
completely in the dark.
Rather
than providing businessmen, entrepreneurs and other investors with useful
information regarding the overall level of savings, the risk-free interest
rate is now dominated by central bank policy and inflation expectations. To
be more specific, the short-term interest rate is set by the central bank and
the long-term interest rate is determined by the combination of central bank
manipulation and the market's inflation expectations. Consequently, the
interest rate signal will now routinely be the OPPOSITE of what it would be
in a genuinely free market. For example, under the current system it is
common for the central bank to force the interest rate down to a low level at
a time when there is also a relatively low level of savings, and for
inflation expectations to force the interest rate upward at a time when the
economy-wide savings level is relatively high.
We
never cease to be amazed by the fact that people who are smart enough to
understand why a committee should never be given the power to set the price
of eggs believe that a committee should be given the power to set the price
of credit.
When
will the Fed begin to hike the overnight interest rate?
It is
clear that the Fed's plan is to keep its interest rate target close to zero
until there is a significant improvement in the US employment situation. It's
not likely that there will be any improvement in the US employment situation
over the next 12 months, so does this mean that the Fed Funds rate will
remain near zero for at least another year?
Whether
it does or not will largely be determined by inflation expectations. As the
"Austrians" have always known and as the "Keynesians"
discovered to their amazement during the 1970s, a high rate of unemployment
will not prevent the prices of goods and services from rising in response to
rapid money-supply growth. Rising prices lead to rising inflation
expectations, and once inflation expectations exceed a certain level it will
become necessary for the Fed to hike its targeted interest rate regardless of
what the employment situation happens to be at the time. The reason is that
if the Fed refuses to boost the overnight interest rate in the face of rising
inflation expectations, then long-term interest rates -- including interest
rates on adjustable-rate home mortgages -- will begin to accelerate upward.
That
is, in the absence of a meaningful increase in employment the start of the
Fed's next rate-hiking campaign will be determined by inflation expectations.
The question, then, is: how will we know when inflation expectations have
exceeded the level at which a Fed rate hike will be deemed necessary? We
suspect that the 'tipping point' will be a decisive break below the support
line (the base of the multi-year topping formation) drawn on the following
monthly T-Bond chart.
Anticipation
of a Fed rate-hiking campaign could be an excuse for an intermediate-term
gold correction at some point, but there is almost no chance that the Fed
will become 'tight' enough to end gold's long-term upward trend. In our
opinion, an extension of gold's bull market to at least 2013-2014 is 'baked
into the cake' based on the money-supply growth that has already occurred.
Steve Saville
www.speculative-investor.com
|