In the same category

All Hell

IMG Auteur
Published : August 05th, 2014
683 words - Reading time : 1 - 2 minutes
( 21 votes, 3.7/5 ) , 3 commentaries
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
0
Send
3
comment
Our Newsletter...
Category : Editorials

T hat tractable beast, World Opinion, was apparently looking the other way when US video war-gamers blew up wedding parties and donkeys by remote control in Pakistan, Yemen, and Afghanistan, not to mention the now long ago shock-and-awe bombardment of poor innocent Iraq. It’s not paying much attention these days to the remorseless advance of ISIS (or ISL or the Islamic State) as it cuts a psychopathic swath through the Middle East marked by wholesale executions of civil servants, beheadings of “infidels,” and the occasional crucifixion of suspected enemies and traitors. UN Secretary Ban Ki Moon is so busy issuing condemnations of Israel that he has forgotten to ask Hamas the elementary question: What part of… quit firing rockets… don’t you understand?

Demonic forces are on the loose again now one hundred years after Europe blew itself apart for no good reason. (Why? Because some young Serbian nobody killed the heir to the Austrian throne on a back street in Sarajevo?) Maybe we are making a mistake to think that any sort of rationality applies now. Here in the depraved and disintegrating USA, we pretend that Afghanistan threatens our national interest from 7,000 miles away while denying that Russia has any business with its crumbling next-door neighbor (and former province), Ukraine — the crumbling of which was bought and paid for by the US Department of State and CIA.

The long sobering aftermath of World War Two is over now and World Opinion can once again assume the role of a rough beast slouching toward cataclysm. Starting from the premise that nothing is funnier than unhappiness, how funny is it that the US affects to manage the great demographic upheavals of the Middle East and Europe while it can’t even protect its own citizens from the still-florid looting and swindling operations of Wall Street — not to mention the wholesale renting of congressmen, cabinet secretaries, supreme court justices, and White House aides by US chartered corporations?

World Opinion is easily massaged by grandstanding around children who have been put in harm’s way deliberately by cynical adults. The UN was, shall we say, less than fastidious about Hamas stashing rockets and other war materials in their Gaza schools. In fact, they didn’t make peep — for years — and now they dare squawk that these arsenals are being targeted, even as Hamas continues its rocket attacks? Did these UN morons ever grok the possibility that they were being played? And, of course, not to change the subject too harshly but note also how children are being used to play the suspension of US immigration laws by cynical US political party hacks. Despite the dishonest pleadings of undocumentarians, what part of… illegal immigrant… remains unclear,?

Here is what I think is going to happen now. Israel will withdraw from Gaza. Hamas’s war-making ability has been deeply degraded for a while, but any further rocket attacks will be answered in kind. Perhaps the citizens of Gaza will rethink who they want to have as leaders. The action will shift back to the ISIS swath across Syria and Iraq. ISIS has become a juggernaut, seizing enough money and valuable assets like oil and gas fields to greatly expand its vicious operations. You can say this about ISIS: they are very plain about their objective: to reestablish a fundamentalist caliphate — that is, to return to the eleventh century. Personally, I think the Middle East is primed for exactly that outcome, since its brief adventure as a wealthy, modernized oil-producing region is reaching its natural limits. The very specter of that fate is enough to destabilize the fragile political arrangements there, and may actually hasten the arrival of those natural limits as the activities of ISIS shuts in the necessarily rational operation of the companies that run the oil wells, pipelines, transport terminals. Watch what it does to capital markets, without which oil production founders anywhere.

Speaking of capital markets, keep your eyes on the US indexes. Never has so much fragility-in-motion come so close to an implacable wall of consequence. All hell seems to be breaking loose.

Data and Statistics for these countries : Afghanistan | Iraq | Israel | Pakistan | Russia | Syria | Ukraine | Yemen | All
Gold and Silver Prices for these countries : Afghanistan | Iraq | Israel | Pakistan | Russia | Syria | Ukraine | Yemen | All
<< Previous article
Rate : Average note :3.7 (21 votes)
>> Next article
James Howard Kunstler has worked as a reporter and feature writer for a number of newspapers, and finally as a staff writer for Rolling Stone Magazine. In 1975, he dropped out to write books on a full-time basis. His nonfiction book, "The Long Emergency," describes the changes that American society faces in the 21st century. Discerning an imminent future of protracted socioeconomic crisis, Kunstler foresees the progressive dilapidation of subdivisions and strip malls, the depopulation of the American Southwest, and, amid a world at war over oil, military invasions of the West Coast; when the convulsion subsides, Americans will live in smaller places and eat locally grown food.
WebsiteSubscribe to his services
Comments closed
  All Favorites Best Rated  
"what part of… illegal immigrant… remains unclear,?"

I'll tell you what part remains unclear to me. The part that is unclear to me is why human beings in one part of the world would make other human beings not just unwelcome, but illegal. The stealing of other people's money, in order to give it to some other people that just arrived here in order to buy their vote, is what should be illegal. The entire redistribution of wealth welfare state is corrupt, immoral, and illegal.


I share this fellow's view of immigrants. Well, I agree with everything Grover Norquist says here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eeM92f0PBA
Rate :   1  1Rating :   0
EmailPermalink
Let me help you with the concept so you'll understand. Let's say you have a Legal Border that you call Your House. A man comes to Your House, crosses over through Your Front Door and takes Your Wife. Currently there are laws on the books that indicate Your Legal Border. In this case; law enforcement would ARREST and PROSECUTE the man that "illegally" crossed Your Border and took Your Wife.

There is a New Wave Interpretation that the Existing Border Laws should be Ignored. I see, by reading your statement: "The part that is unclear to me is why human beings in one part of the world would make other human beings not just unwelcome, but illegal" that YOU are one of those people who desires the elimination of Your Legal Border. Be careful what you wish for ! !
"that YOU are one of those people who desires the elimination of Your Legal Border. Be careful what you wish for ! !"

It's probably because I am more than just sympathetic to anarcho-capitalists. In other words, I believe I am one. However, I believe Ron Paul gave the best/most correct answer a person could give when he was asked if he was actually an anarcho-capitalist. He said, "I believe that's the ultimate goal, but I don't think we're ready for that."

I suppose I should try and put on my minarchist hat when thinking about Gov't borders. But I find that pretty hard to do because I think of people as being people. In other words, in my mind there is no such thing as a "immigrants"... in the sense where ...I would think of them as "illegal people". Some folks might think of other people as being "illegal", because these other people that they haven't met or gotten to know yet, weren't born within their nationalistic and patriotic gov't border. I don't think that way. I think of all of as individuals. And I don't buy into "for the motherland! - we're the greatest nation on earth!" nationalism/patriotism. Nations aren't great. The people, the individuals are.

There are other individuals from other land areas that speak languages and have cultures that I might not be intimately familiar with. But why would these people be "illegal" if all they want to do is work and live? I'll tell you what I am for, I'm for ending ALL government redistribution of wealth programs, whether the program is for redistributing to individual "citizens", individual "immigrants", or "corporations". I really am for levelling the playing field and having "Equal Opportunity", for employment and the pursuit of happiness.

Did you watch the video that put up a link to? I take you don't agree with Grover Norquist when he says, "Look, this country was built with immigrants. This all about people deciding to voluntarily come here because it's a free and open society. When people don't want to come, that's the time to worry."

"There is a New Wave Interpretation that the Existing Border Laws should be Ignored." Right now I'm finding it difficult for me to address this. I've also heard there's people that believe we should just ignore, do away with, or forget, The Constitution. I wonder to what degree that has already happened? Executive Order 6102 issued by Franklin D Roosevelt making the constitutional money that was in use and in circulation at the time "illegal". Was that really Constitutional? The Supreme Court upholding the ACA(Obamacare) as Constitutional because it's a "tax". The ACA was not represented as a new tax when it was in legislation! And no taxation without representation! How about Richard M. Nixon on August 15, 1971 when he, issued an Executive Order if I'm not mistaken, "temporarily" suspending the convertibility of the dollar into gold with our international trading partners. Was this "temporary" measure Constitutional?

How about Article 1 Section 10 of the Constitution where it says, "No State shall... make anything but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts;"? So, are the States paying their debts only in gold and silver? If not, why not? It's what the Constitution says! There has been no "amendment" to the Constitution regarding our monetary system as it's laid out and stated in Article 1 Section 10, that I'm aware of.

My point is, I'm all for what Ron Paul says when he says, "We need to go back to the Constitution!". Because I think he's also right when he says that he doesn't think we're ready for anarcho-capitalism. And if that were to happen, I don't believe that we would be treating our borders or immigrants, the way we currently are. Remember, going back to The Constitution would mean no handouts from the Government, no special favors or special privilege from the Government or it's politicians! The Government is supposed to uphold the property rights of individuals. There is no such thing as redistribution of wealth rights and when there is redistribution of wealth, then the gov't is not upholding individual property rights! No citizen or immigrant should be getting any kind of handout, favor, or privilege from the Gov't. That should all be decided and done in the private sector and private charities. If we had such a thing, I believe there is a very good chance your view of our "borders" and "immigrants" might be significantly different than it is now with our current unconstitutional environment.
Rate :   1  0Rating :   1
EmailPermalink
Latest comment posted for this article
"that YOU are one of those people who desires the elimination of Your Legal Border. Be careful what you wish for ! !" It's probably because I am more than just sympathetic to anarcho-capitalists. In other words, I believe I am one. However, I believe Ro  Read more
OneTinSoldier66 - 8/6/2014 at 8:26 PM GMT
Rating :  1  0
Top articles
World PM Newsflow
ALL
GOLD
SILVER
PGM & DIAMONDS
OIL & GAS
OTHER METALS